노유찬

June 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Lee Sun-hee (singer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:10, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Lee Sun-hee (singer). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:58, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Images

Stop changing image sizes, they are too big as you have been already told, what dont you understand? Snowflake91 (talk) 11:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

First of all, 300px is not that big and it is not only allowed size in wikipedia, but also in encouraged range of size. If you consider the amount of article, 300px is not way too big size for the article.

Second, I think you can change their size on your own if you think that is too big. Why do you keep undoing revisions? Please stop changing pictures that represent them better than before.

Lastly, This is not fact like above two, only my thoughts. If it is problem of your monitor, try to think in terms of viewers using Ipad, Galaxytap, Moblie devices, not computer. This is way too small in those devices. Thank you. Have a nice day. --노유찬 (talk) 12:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop changing image sizes, as you/ve been asked before. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

You again messed images at featured article (Mariah Carey), one more edit like this and this is going to WP:ANI and you'll get blocked. Snowflake91 (talk) 16:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

If you mean to do that, I have no authority to stop that, so be it. But before you do that, you can tell me how and why do you think those edits messed articles. Even two or three, I don't remember but, people thanked for the edits in Mariah Carey. If your explanations are not enough, then I can go to WP:AN and we can see whether the edits that just have replaced the images and not the size. --노유찬 (talk) 18:05, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Because there is a consensus about image sizes and policies, those articles have FA status for a reason, you are being disruptive and was reverted by THREE people and you are still doing this instead of starting a discussion first so you will obviously get blocked now since this is classic edit warring, I have already filled a report. Snowflake91 (talk) 18:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I get that there is a consensus about image sizes. And until the moment I got it, I just set it as default. But whether you just don't get the it, or ignore the fact and being subjective, you may thought that the revisions I have made are the same. But as they aren't, this case is not on the so-called 'The three-revert rule' policy because each case is counted as one separately. I can guarantee that all the image sizes are default, or even smaller than that, and now you reported me because of image size issues. There are no image size issues here, as I understood and accepted your advise. Even though there were several conspicuous differences that I just got back the size to the default between the revisions I have made, you just kept reverting them. If you insist doing that, so be it, but we'll see what happens. --노유찬 (talk) 18:37, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Cha Eun-woo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Music Bank

Park Bo-gum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Music Bank

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Image spam

Hello, I have reverted your edits to Lee Tae-min. Please stop spamming articles with a mass of images, it isn’t necessary and this has been mentioned in multiple edit summaries. A few images throughout articles can be useful, but not in the manor you’ve been adding them. Alexanderlee (talk) 15:46, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Snowflake91 (talk) 17:27, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry for that. I just edited following the guidelines. And I think there is a huge misunderstanding for you. Editing is not a privilege, it is a service. Consider it as an act of help, and abandon your elitism. -- 노유찬 (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Freddie Mercury. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop re-sizing images, you've been asked twice already - FlightTime (open channel) 22:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Tae-min. - FlightTime (open channel) 22:50, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ƏXPLICIT 23:49, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cha Eun-woo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Music Bank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ƏXPLICIT 00:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your persistent abusive edits while logged out, like you have done with 58.79.236.68 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 2001:4430:6833:885a::14f0:5b6 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), among others, shows that you are not here to work constructively or to respect consensus. This behavior is not tolerated. ƏXPLICIT 00:51, 21 July 2019 (UTC)