Concern regarding Draft:Battle of nishapur (1200)

edit

  Hello, طاها صایم. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of nishapur (1200), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghurid conquest of Khorasan (August 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, طاها صایم! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
hello mr kulie tastic i wonder why my topic was not accpected, i have written a topic about conquest of khorasan by ghurids because there was not a topic about that which is so important for those who wants to know about ghurids conquests as i see i have written every words by sources and i have mentioned them. طاها صایم (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). You have a single reference which is not enough to show notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
OK i understand, I can add more sourecs, but i do not know how many sourecs are enough may i know if add more sourecs my topic would be published? طاها صایم (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
There is no fixed amount of sources or a guarantee of being accepted other than as set out by the guideline Wikipedia:Notability. The section Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline is the expanded version of my sentence above. A lot of people say 3 sources is enough, but it depends on the quality of the source and how much information they have in them. If you can find 3+ sources (in total including your existing one) that are more than passing mentions then add them and resubmit. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 13:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
hello sir i hope you be well, sir i added more sourecs and as i said before ghurid campaign in khorasan is so imortant, ghurid campaign in india is available in Wikipedia but ghurid campiagn in khorasan isn't available while it is part of ghurid empire history, that is the reson why i have written this topic, at the end may i ask you will be my topic published in Wikipedia or not. طاها صایم (talk) 08:20, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi, there are currently a lot of drafts waiting for review see Category:Pending AfC submissions. They are not reviewed in any particular order, some reviewers check new submissions, some the oldest, some at random and others work on topic areas. Unfortunately there are not enough volunteer reviewers to keep the backlog and wait times as short as we should like. I can see you have added a number of new sources and resubmitted so it will be reviewed at some point, it's just a case of waiting. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
thank you a lot sir طاها صایم (talk) 08:48, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Balkh (1198) (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 14:35, 28 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Balkh (1198) (August 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

  Hello طاها صایم! Your additions to Draft:Battle of Balkh (1198) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghurid conquest of Khorasan (August 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2024 (UTC)Reply