Your submission at Articles for creation: Aurit Zamir (November 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Styyx was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi
I have added 5 very realiable references
Can you please publish this page?`` פונטיין (talk) 12:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, פונטיין! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 19:14, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Aurit Zamir has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aurit Zamir. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Aurit Zamir

edit

  Hello, פונטיין. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aurit Zamir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yair Lev for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yair Lev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yair Lev until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mccapra (talk) 06:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Yair Lev

edit

  Hello, פונטיין. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yair Lev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Yair Lev

edit
 

Hello, פונטיין. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yair Lev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit
 

Hello פונטיין. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Sam Spiegel Film and Television School, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:פונטיין. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=פונטיין|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:32, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, פונטיין. Thank you for your work on Mor Eldar. User:EytanMelech, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

the amount of content i see available on her online is just barely enough to have me consider not doing an AfD on this, but this article needs to seriously be cleaned up in order to comply with WP standards. The fact that there is an unconnected Hebrew article is enough to make me not automatically nominate this article for AfD.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|EytanMelech}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

EytanMelech (talk) 12:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)Reply