User talk:Ավետիսյան91/Archive/2018

Simply Technologies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Simply Technologies, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Currently, none of the cited sources can be considered in depth coverage in a reliable source, as they are either company listings, software listings, sites run by Simply Technologies, or sites that publish user-created content. The closest the article currently gets to citing in-depth coverage in a reliable source is the coverage at iTel, but that article is only about one of Simply Technologies' products, not about the company itself (and is arguably both too short and too reliant on quotes from people affiliated with the company).

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:24, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Linkspam

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Non-bank financial institution. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Waddle.com.au does not seem to be a suitable source. Zazpot (talk) 09:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to QuickBooks. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Waddle.com.au does not seem to be a suitable source. Zazpot (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Thomas Whalan. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. rentaspace.com.au does not seem to be a suitable source. Zazpot (talk) 09:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi dear Zazpot. Thanks for the letter. I will pay attention later. --Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained removal of content

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stadium of Light, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 09:46, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Zazpot, I've removed the BROKEN link. Please check the link (404 - SAFC). Thanks.--Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ավետիսյան91: deleting dead links is not the best way to handle them (unless they were inappropriate in the first place, in which case say so). A better way to handle dead links is described here. Either way, please leave an appropriate edit summary to make your intentions clear. Zazpot (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at David Luiz, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 09:55, 18 October 2018 (UTC); revised 17:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Dear Zazpot, Can you please show my edit on David Luiz article? (Revision history). Thanks. --Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

@Ավետիսյան91: thank you for your reply. Your edit to David Luiz contained no edit summary, and removed referenced material, which is why I warned you about it. But on closer inspection, your edit also reverted some nasty vandalism contained in the middle of the edit. As such, I have struck out my warning above. Please accept my apologies for my error, and please do use edit summaries to minimise the risk that I or other editors will make this sort of mistake about your edits in future. Thank you, Zazpot (talk) 17:27, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Ավետիսյան91, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to TAFE NSW have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Hello Diannaa, Thank you for your help. I will pay attention later. Regards--Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 19:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)