Октябрь123

December 2023

Hello, I'm Chaotic Enby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ataru Nakamura have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ChaotıċEnby(t · c) 20:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Maylingoed. An edit you recently made to Damon Andrews seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (My contributions to Wikipedia📜) 23:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Ingrith Johnson Deyrup-Olsen, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (My contributions to Wikipedia📜) 23:54, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 00:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Октябрь123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Six months without touching Wikipedia at all to request unblock so here I am. I understand what I did wrong, I kept adding letters to articles one by one and disruptively moved words around. While my intention was not to harm Wikipedia a lot it was right to block me because I was not being productive at all, being disruptive and other people had to clean up after my work. Originally I heard about Steven Pruitt (the 5 million edit guy) during Christmas from my friend and wanted to also get a bunch of edits in the spur of the moment. Because it's kinda cool. But now I realize that that was the wrong way to contribute, and that it is pointless to try to gain many edits without actually contributing anything valuable. It is more about quality than quantity, so this summer I promise to be very productive. I watched some basic guidance videos a few weeks back while working out so please allow me a chance in proving myself. Октябрь123 (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Six months without touching Wikipedia at all to request unblock so here I am. I understand what I did wrong, I kept adding letters to articles one by one and disruptively moved words around. While my intention was not to harm Wikipedia a lot it was right to block me because I was not being productive at all, being disruptive and other people had to clean up after my work. Originally I heard about Steven Pruitt (the 5 million edit guy) during Christmas from my friend and wanted to also get a bunch of edits in the spur of the moment. Because it's kinda cool. But now I realize that that was the wrong way to contribute, and that it is pointless to try to gain many edits without actually contributing anything valuable. It is more about quality than quantity, so this summer I promise to be very productive. I watched some basic guidance videos a few weeks back while working out so please allow me a chance in proving myself. [[User:Октябрь123|Октябрь123]] ([[User talk:Октябрь123#top|talk]]) 00:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Six months without touching Wikipedia at all to request unblock so here I am. I understand what I did wrong, I kept adding letters to articles one by one and disruptively moved words around. While my intention was not to harm Wikipedia a lot it was right to block me because I was not being productive at all, being disruptive and other people had to clean up after my work. Originally I heard about Steven Pruitt (the 5 million edit guy) during Christmas from my friend and wanted to also get a bunch of edits in the spur of the moment. Because it's kinda cool. But now I realize that that was the wrong way to contribute, and that it is pointless to try to gain many edits without actually contributing anything valuable. It is more about quality than quantity, so this summer I promise to be very productive. I watched some basic guidance videos a few weeks back while working out so please allow me a chance in proving myself. [[User:Октябрь123|Октябрь123]] ([[User talk:Октябрь123#top|talk]]) 00:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Six months without touching Wikipedia at all to request unblock so here I am. I understand what I did wrong, I kept adding letters to articles one by one and disruptively moved words around. While my intention was not to harm Wikipedia a lot it was right to block me because I was not being productive at all, being disruptive and other people had to clean up after my work. Originally I heard about Steven Pruitt (the 5 million edit guy) during Christmas from my friend and wanted to also get a bunch of edits in the spur of the moment. Because it's kinda cool. But now I realize that that was the wrong way to contribute, and that it is pointless to try to gain many edits without actually contributing anything valuable. It is more about quality than quantity, so this summer I promise to be very productive. I watched some basic guidance videos a few weeks back while working out so please allow me a chance in proving myself. [[User:Октябрь123|Октябрь123]] ([[User talk:Октябрь123#top|talk]]) 00:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Please provide a specific, non-trivial edit that you plan to make if unblocked. It doesn't have to be a multi-paragraph affair but needs to be non-trivial. --Yamla (talk) 10:12, 18 June 2024 (UTC) - I am persian, so in the long run I will likely work on stuff relating to that? As a .io player though, since the main guidance videos I watched were about how to create articles, after a (hopeful) unban the first step for me would be making a page for Matheus Valadares (guy who made some of the popular .io games). Then, as I noticed slither.io and agar.io are already good articles, I plan to make diep.io and maybe hole.io into good articles. A specific edit example is fixing the 5th references for Paul Kane's article, the guy who runs the .io domains. Sorry for ramblin' on.

@Yamla: Apologize for ping, I couldn’t figure out how to reply so pinged just in case it doesn’t notify you. Октябрь123