Галактион
Your recent edits
editHello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Please read WP:Talk. Vsmith (talk) 02:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Please explain the purpose of your recent edits at Talk:Alkali metal - I'm afraid they might simply be deleted as SPAM. Mix of calculus and chemistry symbols will simply not be appreciated in a chemical article. Materialscientist (talk) 07:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- The purpose of my recent edits at Talk:Alkali metal is a description of some chemical properties of the mentioned metals. Галактион (talk) 07:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer my question - why mixing calculus and chemistry? Materialscientist (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is "mixing calculus" new name for mathematical logic? Галактион (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, mathematical logic signs are widely used in calculus, that is how I and most others know them, but chemists do not use them in describing reactions. It is important on WP to write in a language which is accepted and understood by many. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- If "mathematical logic signs are widely used in calculus", then "mathematical logic signs" may be used in chemical calculus by those chemists who know or learn them. Галактион (talk) 09:11, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, mathematical logic signs are widely used in calculus, that is how I and most others know them, but chemists do not use them in describing reactions. It is important on WP to write in a language which is accepted and understood by many. Materialscientist (talk) 08:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Is "mixing calculus" new name for mathematical logic? Галактион (talk) 08:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer my question - why mixing calculus and chemistry? Materialscientist (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- The purpose of my recent edits at Talk:Alkali metal is a description of some chemical properties of the mentioned metals. Галактион (talk) 07:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
<indent>Sure they may, but it up to the chemical community whether or not to use them. Most chemists study those symbols in the first 2 years of university, but somehow they don't use them in chemistry. Please think about it. It is perfectly fine to use symbols for yourself, I used japanese hiragana signs to record my math lectures (very efficient). However, I never tried to ask anyone to follow my habits. Materialscientist (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- I admit that at least one chemist doesn't use "mathematical logic signs" in his or her chemical calculus. That is why I describe some chemical properties of the alkali metals in Talk:Alkali metal. Галактион (talk) 09:26, 22 November 2009 (UTC)