\wowzeryest\
|
June 2015
editHello, I'm Winkelvi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to John Forbes Nash, Jr. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 00:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Larry Sanger. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Larry Sanger, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:John Forbes Nash, Jr.. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:11, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cryptography. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:12, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Octuple-precision floating-point format. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:16, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Octuple-precision floating-point format for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Octuple-precision floating-point format is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octuple-precision floating-point format until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:20, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:\wowzeryest\/possible slope formula
editUser:\wowzeryest\/possible slope formula, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:\wowzeryest\/possible slope formula and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:\wowzeryest\/possible slope formula during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:41, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:\wowzeryest\/Functions Library
editUser:\wowzeryest\/Functions Library, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:\wowzeryest\/Functions Library and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:\wowzeryest\/Functions Library during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:44, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:\wowzeryest\/Trigonometric Functions Usage
editUser:\wowzeryest\/Trigonometric Functions Usage, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:\wowzeryest\/Trigonometric Functions Usage and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:\wowzeryest\/Trigonometric Functions Usage during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 01:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please don't delete my pages, I accidentally screwed up
editI forgot to put {{User sandbox}} <!-- EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> {{user page}} At the top of all of my sandbox pages. I'm so sorry. Also I forgot to put my sandbox in the sandbox section. Anyhow, thank you for your awesome concructive criticism. I can a respect a person with constructive criticism, so thank you highlighting the error of my sandbox articles, I have already fixed me all.
June 2015
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with User:\wowzeryest\/possible slope formula. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with User:\wowzeryest\/Functions Library. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:54, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Your recent edits
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:05, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
editYou may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at User:\wowzeryest\/Trigonometric Functions Usage. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:08, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Jacks Base Compression Algorithim
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Jacks Base Compression Algorithim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Everymorning (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jacks Base Compression Algorithim
editThe article Jacks Base Compression Algorithim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This subject appears to fail the general notability guideline. It is unsourced, and no sources were found in a good-faith online search.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. VQuakr (talk) 03:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2016
editHello, I'm JohnBlackburne. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 18446744073709551616 (number), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 02:34, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the translation, but please do not use or translate code you cannot understand. Please edit this to simplify the code and remove errors. Thanks, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)