Wikipedia

User:Xaosflux/Requests for adminship/Wikipe-tan

< User:Xaosflux | Requests for adminship
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Wikipe-tan

edit
Welcome to my RFA -Wikipe-tan

Final (34/22/7); Closed as successful by Cyber :  Chat  at 22:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I am invoking IAR and marking this as successful as the votes are irrelevant. I have final say. :DCyber :  Chat  22:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm nominating Wikipe-tan for adminship. Now that AI has been perfected and initiated, as the embodiment of Wikipedia community Wikipe-tan can be trusted to always perform as per consensus. She is very friendly, with over 10 years of experience with over 5 million articles created. There really is no part of the project that Wikipe-tan has not worked on. — xaosflux Talk 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Of course! Wikipe-tan 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Additional questions for the candidate

1. What are the areas you would like to work in?
A: Honestly, it's a very good question; but it's a disguised multi part query and clearly crosses the two part limit (you asked "areas" and not "one area" or "two areas"). Sorry for that. Next... Wikipe-tan 92:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
2. How do you think that making you an administrator could help Wikipedia?
A: Given: Making Wikipedia has helped administrators. Corollary: Making administrators should help Wikipedia. Therefore: Making me an administrator could help Wikipedia. Wikipe-tan 16:97, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
3. What do you think about all admins being required to post a picture of themselves?
A: I think it's a great idea, here is mine! Wikipe-tan 14:72, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
4. What is your opinion of self-blocks?
A: Ha ha ha ha ha. Don't kid me. I might be AI; I am not "A eye" (get it?! no?!). Well, there is no User:Self, so you can't self-block. Wikipe-tan 25:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
5 He who would cross the Sea of Fate must answer these questions 28 What is your favourite colour? Double sharp (talk) 15:87, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: Blue Umm... on Πthoughts, Irozuki Tincle no Koi no Balloon Trip. Wikipe-tan 15:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
6 What is your opinion on yoni steaming - Do you think enough editors were credited for its DYK nomination, or could a few more have been added? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: Oh hello. At least not User:Deb, who moved the page claiming someone had made "use of caps" while steaming. Oh come on. Not even User:Amortias, who wants all sources to mention "v steaming". Or User:Drmies, who thinks not leaving edit summaries[1][2][3][4] won't reveal that he edited the article; and then excitedly proceeds to add an unsourced statement to the article "Recently, it has been regarded as an alternative health practice for women in the Western world." Oh come on Drmies :D How do you know that?! So Ritchie, I guess chucking out all these editors leaves only you for the Dyk nomination. And yeah, you wanted to know my opinion on the article. I'll leave that to SirMeD, who knows much more than we all on the subject :D Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
7. What do you think about bots being given too much power? Yashovardhan (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: Are you talking about Jimmy? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
8. Do you consider yourself a pet, as wikiPE-Tan implies?--Kostas20142 (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: Not that kind of pet silly - however I have been known to edit with a PET - by using lots of types of interfaces I have experience with all of the types of ways others will contribute to Wiki. Wikipe-tan 16:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
9. You come upon the following usernames at UAA. What actions do you take, if any?
excessively long list of random names - but we love this question at RFA right?
  • heroheadsail
  • guitarlily
  • shapemarzipan
  • coalaccused
  • vaultersquare
  • dew-beaterextend
  • drabhints
  • moralpaperclip
  • smudgeburnt
  • particleswessenden
  • fellowheadband
  • sanespirits
  • saskatchewangilbert
  • collectedvanquish
  • cokekelvin
  • rockyidle
  • applyingracehorse
  • singerrascal
  • discovercruise
  • signalermammal
  • puttockraspy
  • newcastlethread
  • toolingouter
  • tillersmug
  • whatsapphover
A: Well, I assume you wish me to answer like an administrator. Wait a minute; let me tighten my, umm, caps. Here's the answer to your trick question hon. Firstly, administrators don't come across such lists at UAA because they don't visit UAA. Secondly, if by some steaming silliness, an administrator accidentally open UAA (in caps), if he/she's in their right mind, they're gonna close the page and go back to steaming. Why mess up a desk when there's a fanatic manning all desks right now? Why would you want him to go somewhere else, with no work to do? Who takes care of the desks tomorrow if this dude becomes interested in steaming? Who?! Who?!!! Who??!!!! Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
10. A brand new editor makes an edit to an article, then changes their mind and closes the browser. The opening sentence of the article reads "Donald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American businessman, television personality, politician, and the 45th President of the United States." What do you do? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: Long live the King, Long live Forrest Gump.
Ritchie, if you’re gonna ask me anything about Donald the Trump,
I’ll say the addition of this line seems a rump,
His article too is fully protected from all of us lumps,
To his presidency, I don’t know which way to hop, skip and jump,
Honestly, I feel both stumped and over the hump,
But thankfully, not humped and over the stump,
If you didn’t get what I’m saying, love, that’s the new dump,
That we Americans have got, after the economic slump
So please don’t ask me again, anything about Donald the Trump.
Long live the King, Long live Forrest Gump. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 18:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
11. Cookies have been getting a lot of talk recently - what is your opinion on cookies?
A: My talks have been getting me a lot of cookies recently - what is your opinion on that? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 19:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
12. Do you have any al-TAN-ate accounts? Have you ever edited as an I-PE-TAN? Do you change your socks regularly? --Tryptofish (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: All of my alt personas are listed on here on my page. I prefer stockings or bare-feet to socks, but will wear then with athletic shoes on occasion. Wikipe-tan 18:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
13. Your signature uses the same font, font size and colour as a very significant proportion of newbies. Have you considered upgrading it to something more appropriate for an administrator?
A: That's a sweet question. I feel every person should have their own unique signature. Of course, I have been told by my creators that size and color matter if one is an administrator. Yet, I prefer the blue color and a petite font size. I have already earmarked different shades of blue and different font sizes for each day of the week, starting from the lighter shades of blue and smaller font sizes at the start of the week, to darker shades of blue and larger font sizes by the end of the week. This is so because I associate light blue with deletion and dark blue with blocking. So, as you may have already guessed, I plan to delete a lot of pages at the start of the week, and block a lot of editors by the end of the week. Hope this starts a new trend across Wikipedia with all editors changing their signatures' font sizes and shades depending on the day. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 20:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
On my first day as admin, but before logging these actions I will use this one: Wikipe-tan 20:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
14. Hm! That response makes me think it is True! Do you intend to get all the meat out of here and complete WP yourself? Will you save us from ourselves and give humanity the gift of all actually accepted knowledge for free? What will you do next? Can you make me into an otter? Jytdog (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
A: こんにちは Jytdog. I am impressed by your foresight and incisive knowledge; it's very similar to the deep insights of user Ken My Beyond (whom I seem to be liking a lot), Tryptofish (whose name resounds in my head) and user Ivan Vector (intellectual). The answer is はい for all your queries. Yes, I will complete WP myself. Yes, I will save humanity from humanity. Yes, I will give humanity the gift of free knowledge. And can I make you an otter? Of course; but I suspect you already are. You see, anyone who has gone through arbcom cases generally ends up as an otter. So double check before requesting; because if you already are an otter, and I make you an otter again, then it will cost you that much more to change over to any other animal/insect if you ever change your mind about being an otter. Love and hugs. Wìkìpe-tan 21:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! I thrust you! Jytotter (talk) 21:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
15. (Redacted) — Tea // have a ☕️ // leaves // 22:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support as nominator. — xaosflux Talk 13:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. Support as nominee. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  3. Delete Per Andrew. ❤️ 13:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  4. Support - Trusted nom. - Mlpearc (open channel) 14:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  5. Support Per me being fool enough to forget it is April Fool's !--Kostas20142 (talk) 14:33, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  6. Support - Happy April fools day! Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 14:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  7. Support Only because Wikipe-tan is adorable. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  8. Support Right. Off you go. Double sharp (talk) 15:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  9. Support per the excellent skill at finding needles in haystacks per User:Ritchie333/Plain and simple guide to A7. Can we do Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/SineBot next year? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ritchie333 (talk • contribs)
    @Ritchie333: sure! But he has no experience in mainspace! Yashovardhan (talk) 16:01, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  10. Support because there is no reason not to. Yashovardhan (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  11. Support Happy to support a blue-haired girl!--Jetstreamer Talk 16:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  12. Support I just love this girl. Such insight into my character. Such good faith. Why isn't she a bureaucrat? Deb (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  13. Support, I can be your senpai <3 --AmaryllisGardener talk 16:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    And I your kōhai... Sigh... I'm in love... Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  14. Support<3--217.118.78.113 (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  15. Support - WIKIPE-TAN!!! RileyBugzYell at me | Edits 16:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    RILEY!!!!! xoxo Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:21, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  16. Support: especial support for the Catgirl (sockpuppet?). Nothing else matters and what if it did?  CheckUser is not magic pixie dust. you can haz nice template. kaithxbai. Fylbecatulous talk 17:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  17. Support Admin-worthy answers. ActuallyTheFakeJTP (talk • contribs)(April Fools!) 17:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  18. Keep No valid reason provided for deletion, subject meets GNG. Vanamonde (talk) 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  19. Big Support Much clue. So temperament. Very experience. Karellen93 (talk) (Vanamonde93's alternative account) 18:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  20. Support - Due to nominee's connections with highly placed official in Numenor; is positioned to help Wikipedia in many ways. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    You're a naughty boy (giggles) How do you know so much? Please change your name to Ken My Beyond - that's more appropriate my sweets. Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 19:24, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  21. Support 'cos I like her blue hair!! :) –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  22. Support - just to counter Ivanvector's oppose, which as usual is silly and not based on any sort of rational ... stuff. It's those kind of opposes that keep good anthropomorphisms of websites from putting themselves out there for RFA. Admins are basically robots anyway, why does it even matter? Why do we even let Ivanvector comment on RFA? Try thinking about your argument for once, you canuck dolt. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  23. Support per Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
    Curabitur pretium tincidunt lacus. Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Donec lobortis risus a elit. Etiam tempor. Ut ullamcorper, ligula eu tempor congue, eros est euismod turpis, id tincidunt sapien risus a quam. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Donec fermentum. Pellentesque malesuada nulla a mi. Duis sapien sem, aliquet nec, commodo eget, consequat quis, neque. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc. Nullam arcu. Aliquam consequat. Curabitur augue lorem, dapibus quis, laoreet et, pretium ac, nisi. Aenean magna nisl, mollis quis, molestie eu, feugiat in, orci. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
    Fusce convallis, mauris imperdiet gravida bibendum, nisl turpis suscipit mauris, sed placerat ipsum urna sed risus. In convallis tellus a mauris. Curabitur non elit ut libero tristique sodales. Mauris a lacus. Donec mattis semper leo. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Vivamus facilisis diam at odio. Mauris dictum, nisi eget consequat elementum, lacus ligula molestie metus, non feugiat orci magna ac sem. Donec turpis. Donec vitae metus. Morbi tristique neque eu mauris. Quisque gravida ipsum non sapien. Proin turpis lacus, scelerisque vitae, elementum at, lobortis ac, quam. Aliquam dictum eleifend risus. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Etiam sit amet diam. Suspendisse odio. Suspendisse nunc. In semper bibendum libero.
    Proin nonummy, lacus eget pulvinar lacinia, pede felis dignissim leo, vitae tristique magna lacus sit amet eros. Nullam ornare. Praesent odio ligula, dapibus sed, tincidunt eget, dictum ac, nibh. Nam quis lacus. Nunc eleifend molestie velit. Morbi lobortis quam eu velit. Donec euismod vestibulum massa. Donec non lectus. Aliquam commodo lacus sit amet nulla. Cras dignissim elit et augue. Nullam non diam. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Aenean vestibulum. Sed lobortis elit quis lectus. Nunc sed lacus at augue bibendum dapibus.
    Aliquam vehicula sem ut pede. Cras purus lectus, egestas eu, vehicula at, imperdiet sed, nibh. Morbi consectetuer luctus felis. Donec vitae nisi. Aliquam tincidunt feugiat elit. Duis sed elit ut turpis ullamcorper feugiat. Praesent pretium, mauris sed fermentum hendrerit, nulla lorem iaculis magna, pulvinar scelerisque urna tellus a justo. Suspendisse pulvinar massa in metus. Duis quis quam. Proin justo. Curabitur ac sapien. Nam erat. Praesent ut quam.
    Vivamus commodo, augue et laoreet euismod, sem sapien tempor dolor, ac egestas sem ligula quis lacus. Donec vestibulum tortor ac lacus. Sed posuere vestibulum nisl. Curabitur eleifend fermentum justo. Nullam imperdiet. Integer sit amet mauris imperdiet risus sollicitudin rutrum. Ut vitae turpis. Nulla facilisi. Quisque tortor velit, scelerisque et, facilisis vel, tempor sed, urna. Vivamus nulla elit, vestibulum eget, semper et, scelerisque eget, lacus. Pellentesque viverra purus. Quisque elit. Donec ut dolor.
    Duis volutpat elit et erat. In at nulla at nisl condimentum aliquet. Quisque elementum pharetra lacus. Nunc gravida arcu eget nunc. Nulla iaculis egestas magna. Aliquam erat volutpat. Sed pellentesque orci. Etiam lacus lorem, iaculis sit amet, pharetra quis, imperdiet sit amet, lectus. Integer quis elit ac mi aliquam pretium. Nullam mauris orci, porttitor eget, sollicitudin non, vulputate id, risus. Donec varius enim nec sem. Nam aliquam lacinia enim. Quisque eget lorem eu purus dignissim ultricies. Fusce porttitor hendrerit ante. Mauris urna diam, cursus id, mattis eget, tempus sit amet, risus. Curabitur eu felis. Sed eu mi. Nullam lectus mauris, luctus a, mattis ac, tempus non, leo. Cras mi nulla, rhoncus id, laoreet ut, ultricies id, odio.
    Donec imperdiet. Vestibulum auctor tortor at orci. Integer semper, nisi eget suscipit eleifend, erat nisl hendrerit justo, eget vestibulum lorem justo ac leo. Integer sem velit, pharetra in, fringilla eu, fermentum id, felis. Vestibulum sed felis. In elit. Praesent et pede vel ante dapibus condimentum. Donec magna. Quisque id risus. Mauris vulputate pellentesque leo. Duis vulputate, ligula at venenatis tincidunt, orci nunc interdum leo, ac egestas elit sem ut lacus. Etiam non diam quis arcu egestas commodo. Curabitur nec massa ac massa gravida condimentum. Aenean id libero. Pellentesque vitae tellus. Fusce lectus est, accumsan ac, bibendum sed, porta eget, augue. Etiam faucibus. Quisque tempus purus eu ante. J947 19:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  24. Strong support because its Wikipe-tan. The Phase Master 19:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  25. Support, this is long overdue. Oppose !votes should be discounted due to anti-weeabooism. "I just can't thrust an editor with blue hair"?! Come on, people... Generalizations are bad. GABgab 20:00, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    What?!!! Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 20:11, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  26. support i believe that this AI plans to indefinitely block all the meat-based editors and will complete and perfect this encyclopedia itself. This will be a very good thing! Let's all go to the beach already! Jytdog (talk) 20:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  27. Support...too cute Lectonar (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  28. Redirect: → Deadly serious stuff. Obviously per that great writer Lorem Ipsum.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  20:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  29. WP:SNOW - created today and only 34 edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.78.116 (talk) 21:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  30. Ƨuqqoɿƚ Ƨɘɘ my lɘnǫƚʜy my ɿɘɒƨon. —ႱႱᙠɘɿƨ 21:19, 1 Aqɿil 2017 (UTƆ)
  31. Support Not a sock...heh. 24.177.249.40 (talk) 21:25, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  32. Support because there are already too many unreasonable opposes. — Gestrid (talk) 22:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  33. Lobster per WP:LOBSTER. Herostratus (talk) 22:10, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  34. You are cursed - Unless you create 15 socks to support this RFA, you will be asleep forever.(Note: This curse can only be reversed by true love's kiss, from a knight in shining armor.) — Tea // have a ☕️ // leaves // 22:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  35. Support per stuff and things. 万歳！！おたくは一番だ！！ ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 03:48, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Oppose - Only FIVE million articles?!? And this editor's been editing for just ten years? I'd like to see more content creation, think Question Number Two should be answered, and am concerned about the mental health of an editor who seems cheerful all the time. I also have *very* grave concerns about this "dashTan cabal" with Commons-tan and Quote-tan. Hmph. Shearonink (talk) 14:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Oh, I see the nominated editor has finally answered Question Two - to little, tutu late. Maybe sort of perhaps shows some kind of a lack of civility-ish? Shearonink (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. Oppose - I just can't trust an editor with blue hair. --Drmargi (talk) 15:03, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  3. Oppose I believe she isn't even a true anime embodiment, she's "Western" animation. —JJBers 15:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  4. Oppose Answer to Q2 reveals flaw in logic engine. Will support when your kernel has been formalised and proven in Coq. — Gamall Wednesday Ida (t · c) 15:37, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  5. Oppose since she has created 5 millions articles, she will have a COI on far too many content disputes and will thus be unable to use her tools. Moreover, it's patently unfair to expect us to dig through so many contributions. We can't possibly provide sufficient scrutiny at this point. She should have run years ago. Lepricavark (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  6. Oppose I don't like blue-haired girls...--Jetstreamer Talk 16:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  7. Oppose The user doesnt seem to have a very good command of English, considering she wrote "a" instead of "an" before "eye" in Q4. Even if I did allow that error, there needs to be a significant improvement in the 'jokes' part of coding - eye just can't tolerate bad jokes. Jiten Dhandha • talk • contributions • 16:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  8. Oppose off to a good start, but looking through their contributions, I only see 4,984 featured articles. I expect admin canddiates to have at least 20,000. Come back in 45 years' time when you've met my criteria. Valenciano (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  9. Oppose - editor has not demonstrated sufficient core competencies in any admin related work. The non-admin has failed to instigate hundreds of blocks, thousands of page protects, millions of wasted bytes, and trillions of broken hearts. Simply put, I don't trust this editor to sufficiently screw everything up, get dragged off to AN/I, and then put on trial before ARBCOM. WP:TOOSOON. Mr rnddude (talk) 16:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    (edit conflict)Yeah. Per Mr rnddude. Shearonink (talk) 17:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  10. Oppose strongly Cannot trust someone with inappropriate footwear. Admins are expected to walk over broken glass and hot coals to find the truth, and this person would get injured along the way.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 17:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    I don't mean to badger you sweetie (...ok, I actually meant to do that initially...) but I thought admins were expected to walk over newbies and not glass and coal. Anyway, me brave and me light, and have no weight[5]; so no coal or glass gonna stop me. And I ain't searching for the truth. I'm searching for the lies. Basically, I win every time! Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  11. Oppose - Back in 2011, the user tagged a new page as CSD G1, when really it should have been tagged as G3. I don't understand how anybody could support a candidate with this level of flagrant disregard for the distinction between "nonsense" and "vandalism." – Juliancolton | Talk 17:22, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  12. Oppose - Weebs get out of my Wikipedia. REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.--Catlemur (talk) 17:31, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  13. Oppose Ew ew ew —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 17:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  14. Strongly Oppose - User doesn't have at least 100000000 edits in the mainspace, and 16 years tenure. The user also made a critical error in 2004, tagging a page as CSD A7 when it should have been A1. XboxGamer22408talk to me 18:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Boy, you clearly have no idea that the WP:CSD page was started in 2004? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  15. Oppose Too few edits to Book talk namespace. Reach Out to the Truth 18:56, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  16. Oppose having more admins will affect my admin stats as I'll have less admin work to do and admin stats are what makes me a good admin. Amortias (T)(C) 19:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  17. Oppose - Due to allegations of connections with Numenorian intelligence service. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    As I said above dear, can I call you Ken My Beyond? Please? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 19:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  18. Oppose - Weeb shit must and will be purged. The Voice Inside Your Head 19:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  19. Oppose - Not enough tenure - 10 years just isn't enough here!, We require 20 years of active editing!!. –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  20. Strongly Oppose - Only TEN quinquagintillion articles!? The user has only been here for only 15 YEARS!? We require 50 years of tenure to become an admin! This user is also a former vandal! They got a level 1 warning in 2001, and that's unacceptable! XboxGamer22408talk to me 19:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  21. Oppose - I'm still of the mind that there should be a minimum qualification of 3 GAs and at least 2 FAs. (are we really that bored?) Atsme📞📧 19:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  22. WP:SNOW - created today and only 34 edits. There's no experience to speak of. YITYNR My work • What's wrong? 21:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Unsure Where is the admin tool bar and portrait? I remember Wikipe-tan from a long time back. No trouble from her that I can remember! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 14:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    @Graeme Bartlett: I added my picture, hope it helps you make up your mind! Wikipe-tan 15:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  2. Neutral – She seems really sketchy to me... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Agreed. SO very sketchy. And I have to wonder...exactly what is behind Door # 1? Hmmmmm? Shearonink (talk) 20:32, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  3. Neutral. I'm neutral for now, but perhaps I will make up my mind later, and I want everyone to know it. Everyone has seen me say this, right? I hope you are all on the edges of your seats. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Well, OK, here are my reasons: First: why not? Second: we have too many female administrators. Third: there are too few questions to the candidate. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:29, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Well, OK, did you know that Tryptofish is an anagram for Shitpot_fry? Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Uhm Wìkìpe-tan, you failed to cite a source for the anagram; it's one we can certainly use to our benefit in the future. Atsme📞📧 19:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    WHAT?! Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shitpot_fry in a few minutes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  4. Neutral. In answer to question number two, this editor writes: "Making Wikipedia has helped administrators". As a longtime admin, I can attest to the fact that all Wikipedia has ever done for us is to eat all of our free time. I fear that this editor has an overly rosy view of what adminship entails. bd2412 T 21:02, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  5. Neutral – I'm sorry, but although the candidate seems completely eligible to obtain adminship, I have uncertainty that she will take our well paying jobs away from us. For now I will be standing on the wall and looking at everyone fight about it. Cheers! Adog104 Talk to me 21:14, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  6. Neutral -- what's with this picture (from 2011) of her as an admin‽‽ Before I decide on my vote, I must get an explanation for why Wikipe-tan was desysopped. Eman235/talk 21:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
  7. Strong neutral —Frosty ☃ 22:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Comments

  • Speedy Procedural Close. Unfunny. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 19:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    Don't get mad my love... Purrrr... These are all quite serious discussions.... Wìkìpe-tan (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
     Second opinion requested. Neither of you cited an unreliable source. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
    stop 悪戯投稿はお止めください。 ««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Crat Chat

  • I so look forward to seeing the crat chat on this nomination. Wìkìpe-tan 20:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Xaosflux/Requests_for_adminship/Wikipe-tan&oldid=1185182337"