User:Voorts/sandbox/Comparative constitutional law

Comparative constitutional law is an interdisciplinary field of legal studies, a method of constitutional interpretation, and a tool used in drafting constitutions by constituent assemblies. Comparative constitutional law has its roots in ancient Greek and Roman political philosophy, and emerged as an academic area of inquiry in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, particularly among scholars in the United States. As a field of study, comparative constitutional law focuses on a wide range of topics, including constitutional design and structure, individual and group rights, standards of judicial review, and the categorization of constitutions.

Lawyers and jurists have also used comparative constitutional approaches in legal practice and decision-making. Several high courts have used comparative approaches, including the high courts of the United States, South Africa, India, and Israel.

History edit

roots of the field

development of comparative constitutional studies as a formal method and area of inquiry

Mark Tushnet

Vicki C. Jackson

Methodologies edit

different approaches to comparative constitutional law

Functionalism edit

tk

Quantitative approaches edit

tk

Areas of inquiry edit

intro

Federalism edit

tk

Judicial review edit

strong vs. weak form

Categorization edit

liberalism vs. illiberalism

Constitutional amendment edit

tk

Proportionality edit

tk

Antidiscrimination law edit

tk

Rights edit

tk

Use in judicial interpretation edit

intro.

United States edit

Lawrence v. Texas

Roper v. Simmons

South Africa edit

south africa constitutional court's use of comparative law

Use in constitutional formation edit

comparative approaches in drafting constitutions

See also edit

Notes edit

References edit

External links edit

tk