VICVONWIKVIT

edit

I have realized of being able of reading psychophysically active molecules and the mind of their developers | Victor Vittori

I am used to link systematically molecular structures, laboratory results, clinical results, people's experiences, side effects. Writing pharmacology implies a responsibility because the pages are read by people who rely on what they read. The data provided by pharmaceutical companies and by so called reputable sources are often incomplete or misleading or even falsified. It is mandatory to compare such data with structural chemical evidences and with clinical results. There is no way to write pharmacology properly without doing any kind of research! Otherwise the job just repeats common beliefs leading to potential adverse impacts on millions of patients. Some products are considered safe whereas they are patently toxic, some are safer than thought, some are systematically prescribed following indications inciting to abuse. At this point it would be advisable not to write at all… Please write concisely only what is strictly necessary, if you have no direct mastery of the chemicals you are describing. Please do not assume anything. Please do not trust. I admit I know nothing, except of what I can see or identically replicate countless times; it is the reason why I prefer to experience, watch, jot, link, digest, sort, categorize, catalog, instead of writing; I am classifying by both structure and significant biochemical action some hundreds of molecules and hacking some tenths; it is a complex yet private work though. | Victor Vittori