User:Unitanode/Evidence of chicanery at Generation Jones

In the third deletion nomination for Generation Jones, the result of the discussion was Keep, with 13 keep recommendations, and 4 delete recommendations. However, at least 5 of the keeps seem like either SPAs, or perhaps even out-and-out sockpuppets. Additionally, the final keep was simply a user who said, "Keep because I'm an inclusionist and I like it." Below is some of the evidence I've gathered on the matter.

Contributions of selected users who recommended "Keep" edit

Contributions of selected IPs who recommended "Keep" edit

Suspicious IPs who have contributed to the GJ article edit

Suspicious users who have contributed to the GJ article edit

Wikilink spamming of this article edit

List of mainspace articles that link to Generation Jones article. Many are without merit. (I have removed several links to the article that were without merit. Some have been restored by Treading Water, while others have not.)