Wikipedia

User:The ed17/Archives/26

< User:The ed17‎ | Archives

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter edit

 

Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to   Sasata (submissions), our round one winner (1010 points), and to   Hunter Kahn (submissions) and   TonyTheTiger (submissions), who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70).   Staxringold (submissions) claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points),   Geschichte (submissions) claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points),   Jujutacular (submissions) claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and   Candlewicke (submissions) claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Mendip hills edit

Page numbers aren't mandatory for citations. The only citation-related FA requirement is that they be consistent. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 18:41, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open! edit

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:31, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010 edit

More to come edit

I added Pierpont Bacon to the article ideas list for the Bacon Challenge 2011. Feel free to sign up and adopt it. :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:17, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Update edit

Thanks. I was waiting more for the bot to wake up (prev update was 16 min late). I incremented queue count and reset time. Materialscientist (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I was getting to that. :P I didn't know that the previous update had been late; I simply assumed that the bot had died. I'm used to DYKadminbot, which would periodically die with seemingly no reason. Thanks, —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Shubinator promised to write a manual on that bot for us this weekend :-) The bot should be stable, but I suppose toolserver problems can crash any bot running there. Materialscientist (talk) 00:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, I'll have to keep an eye out for that. Yeah, without makeshift coding, the new bot should be stable; I'll keep that in mind for next time. :) Regards, —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
My internet connection was the culprit. Hopefully they'll approve my toolserver account soon. Shubinator (talk) 02:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Ah, I see. No problem in any case; it didn't take too long (I <3 those "give" and "tag" links, it makes crediting so easy :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010) edit

  The Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XLVIII (February 2010)
From the coordinators

March, as you know, is an election month for our project, when we pick the coordinators for the next six months. We are seeking motivated individuals willing to devote some of their time and energy to the project so it continues to grow and prosper.

Also, I am making a personal appeal to each of you, the members of this project, to come out and vote for the candidates that run. These users will be responsible for managing the assessment process, answering questions, and making sure that the project's other needs are met. We have approximately 1,000 users who identify as being a part of our project, yet on average only about one-tenth of that number participate in elections. Moreover, as we typically hold referendums on major issues affecting the project along with these election, those who do not vote miss the opportunity to give their opinion on matters affecting the project as a whole. Remember, one vote always makes a difference. For the coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 23:47, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. Admiralty Islands campaign
  2. Alexander Pentland
  3. Anthony Roll
  4. Battle of Winterthur (1799)
  5. Cedric Howell
  6. HMS Calliope (1884)
  7. The Disasters of War

New featured lists:

  1. List of battlecruisers of Germany
  2. List of National Treasures of Japan (castles)

New featured pictures:

  1. Australian military encampment, 1918
  2. Injured Arriving by Boat at Balaklava
  3. USS New Jersey, 1918

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of Taejon
  2. Bombardment of Papeete
  3. First Battle of Maryang San
  4. Henry George Chauvel
  5. List of Knight's Cross with Oak Leaves recipients: 1942
  6. Michael J. Daly
  7. Nguyen Van Nhung
  8. No. 1 Wing RAAF
  9. Oswald Watt
  10. Red Tail Project
  11. Siege of Godesberg (1583)
  12. SMS Goeben
  13. Yermolayev Yer-2
Project news
  • A discussion has begun concerning our military history manual of style's guideline recommending preemptive disambiguation on the naming of military units. As the outcome of the discussion will likely effect a number of pages within our scope we are seeking input from the community on whether the guideline should be changed.
  • Late last year, several largely inactive task forces were merged. However, the mergers of the Australia and New Zealand task forces did not take place as there was no consensus for a new name. To resolve this, a discussion has begun and all editors are encouraged to participate.
Contest department
Awards and honours
Editorial: Reliable sources in military history

Across Wikipedia, guidelines have been set up so that editors can vet sources for themselves. Links to some of these and a guide for checking if a source is reliable can be found in an excellent Signpost dispatch written by Ealdgyth (talk · contribs). However, for the majority of military history-related topics, we strive for more than just a basic reliable source. Specifically, we aim for peer-reviewed articles and books over, for example, most websites.[N 1] Contemporary news articles or accounts can and should be mixed in (if possible) to give a picture of the general view point of the time—were they calm, afraid, unsure of what was going on?

Another major tenet is neutrality. If an editor rewrote the article Dieppe Raid using only the official Canadian history,[N 2] we would have a problem; while it does contain a thorough and in-depth overview, a point-of-view can still be read. For one, it gives an undue amount of focus to Canada's input in the planning of the landing, and it would probably give an undue focus to their troops if a majority of the landing forces hadn't been Canadian. Granted, this is a book written to document that country's role in the Second World War, so you would hope it focuses on them, but this same reason makes it unusable as the primary basis for an article.

In this case, you would like to utilize a few recent, peer-reviewed books and journals, the official British, Canadian and German histories, possibly a few books written by historians from the aforementioned countries, and newspapers from that time period.[N 3] Obviously this is ideal, but you need to represent all three sides in this (the United States would be a fourth, but they played only a minor role in the planning and invading). This neutrality aspect applies especially for battles and to a lesser degree biographies, but it can be utilized in virtually every article in our scope. For example, it could be beneficial to obtain Japanese accounts of B-29 Superfortress bombing raids or non-Puerto Rican peer-reviewed sources for that insular area's role in the Second World War. —Ed (talk • majestic titan)

Notes
  1. ^ It should be noted that certain sites like Combined Fleet or Navweaps, which are authored by recognized or published experts in the field, are not "most websites."
  2. ^ Stacey, Colonel C.P. Six Years of War: The Army in Canada, Britain and the Pacific. 1, Official History of the Canadian Army in the Second World War. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1955.
  3. ^ For example, some of the Canadian newspaper articles written about the raid are listed on their War Museum's website here, while a London Gazette supplement written after the war can be seen on their website. Anyone with access to the archives of The New York Times can view the stories printed by that paper on the raid by searching their archives, and the Google News archive lists many newspapers, some of which were scanned by Google and are available at no charge; most of the non-free material requires a subscription to ProQuest.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010) edit

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator nom edit

Hello Ed! My sincere thanks for the suggestion and the implied confidence, but I have to decline. I realize that the coordinators' rile is both important and not related to disputes etc, but I do not feel that I will be up to the task. For one my work schedule for the months ahead is unclear and I probably won't be able to be regularly around. For the other, WP for me is a place where I can divert myself from real-life tediousness by writing articles, and administrative work just isn't my cup of tea. Best regards, Constantine ✍ 12:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


Battle of the Malacca Strait edit

I believe you misinterpreted the relative speed figures you hid in subject article. The two ship formations engaged nearly head-on at full speed (similar to autos approaching each other on a two-lane highway). The source of the information has been provided as an in-line reference citation. In the absence of objection, I suggest restoration of the hidden text.Thewellman (talk) 20:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. I don't remember what I was thinking there, it seems obvious. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
You know there were other battles at Malacca Strait? Perhaps a See also might be relevant here. See Battle of Pulo Aura. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
That's interesting, I did not. Perhaps a hatnote would be better in this case? —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Hurva for FA edit

Many thanks for your assistance. It seems I've got my work cut out! Chesdovi (talk) 21:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, I'll look back at the FAC asap. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Question edit

Hey,

I was considering running for Coordinator for the Military History WikiProject, but I am not sure. I was very busy in the "real world" during the last elections and did not think I was prepared to devote the time to the WikiProject that it truly deserves. I'm back now and I have started getting involved again. I've always respected your opinion, especially after we served together as coordinators in Tranche VII. I would really appreciate your advice on this. Thanks and Have a Great day! Lord Oliver The Olive Branch 22:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

It's your choice, but I would be sure that you have the time this tranche. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback edit

 
Hello, The ed17. You have new messages at Hohum's talk page.
Message added 18:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Hohum @) 18:44, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

York University edit

Thank you for your quick action to semi-protect the York University article from further vandalism.(Hyperionsteel (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC))

Thanks edit

Thank you so much, for giving a second opinion on the Battle of Agincourt. Have A Great Day! Lord Oliver The Olive Branch 22:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Image discussion for Australian light destroyer project edit

With the recent edits to Australian light destroyer project, in relation to the image File:DDL Kokoda 01.jpg, I think its time all involved took a pause and used discussion to come to a consensus on the way forward. I think your input would be useful: could you please comment at Talk:Australian light destroyer project#Model image: in? out? shake it all about?

Thanks in advance. -- saberwyn 09:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Belt armor
Sortie
Nine Stories (Salinger)
Abemama
Tank
Winston Churchill
Barbette
Calibre
United Nations
Canadian Bar Association
United States
Tanapag Harbor
Joseph Stalin
Bureau of Navigation
Beam (nautical)
Zhukov
Canada
Oberhof, Germany
Sigulda
Cleanup
World War I
Home front during World War II
Participants in World War II
Merge
Chemical warfare
Effects of World War II
Battle of Okinawa
Add Sources
German pocket battleship Admiral Scheer
Military awards of World War II
German K class cruiser
Wikify
HMS Queen Mary
Slovenia
Soviet partisans
Expand
Pacific War
Aircraft carrier
Technology during World War II

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:49, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Kiss of death edit

From the monkey YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:56, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey Ivy, watch where you are putting those lips, k thanks. :-) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 04:05, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Finding images edit

Hi Ed :) Do you know of any US military-related websites (since their works are PD) where I might be able to find images for Advanced Light Strike Vehicle and AN/PSQ-20?

Sorry I didn't stand for the elections, btw. I was a little busy for the last few days and totally forgot about it until it was too late. But it looks like things are ok over there; not as bad as you said it would be :P ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 14:01, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

http://www.defenseimagery.mil/index.htm is your best bet, but the http://www.armytimes.com/ – if they have a story relating to one of those – may have a US government-credited image as well. No problem on the election, more new editors showed up than I thought would. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 15:02, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks... No luck though, didn't find anything. ≈ Chamal talk ¤ 11:41, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

For you edit

 

Whack!

Although Brad said you needed a trout, this seemed more appropriate (not that you are a newbie as the guideline suggests its use). See Talk:Lexington class battlecruiser#Oh no an error! -MBK004 03:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, just what I wanted for Saint Patty's Day! :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 04:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened! edit

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Ed, just thought I'd let you know that my sandboxing of Haruna is almost complete, at which point I'll take it live before an eventual GAN/ACR. Cam (Chat) 16:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
You mean Kongo class? ;) I'll go through Whitley and and add as much info and citations as I can ASAP. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:07, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
It's been transferred to the article at this point, and is awaiting a GAN, which I've contacted Parsec about. Could you check the DYK hook @ the template talk? Cam (Chat) 05:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Done, but something on the secondary armament before it hits the MP would be nice :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
I'll have the time to add substantial stuff on that after Wednesday. I have a large-scale Philosophy presentation (as well as a major chem lab) due that day, but after that I'm on spring break. Cam (Chat) 03:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
No problem. I'll get to Kongo as soon as I can, but you picked a bad time to finish it (yes, I'm blaming you ;) – I have a ton of stuff to do or due on next Tuesday: an exam, a paper, and a project. Yippie, this weekend will be busy. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Iowa class battleship edit

Hope you guys still need my help. :)

Along with this came the associated weights in supporting these new strains: the structure of the ship had to be reinforced, and the power plant had to be made more powerful to avoid a drop in speed.

What does this mean? —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 00:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

I think it was something akin to Hogging and sagging, but I'll double-check tomorrow. Thanks :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Haha, "hogging and sagging"...you people have kooky names for things. :P Almost as kooky as the word "kooky." —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 03:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
You're kooky. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
No, you. I would add a {{cn}} to that, but that joke's been overused like an old skinny cow run so dry that she can't hardly pee no more.
So I demand a third-party reference to your claims. As for my claims, I have your face, your mother, and what she said. —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 21:16, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
And hey, could you please move Age of innocence to Age of Innocence? The second one is a redirect to the first, but the first one isn't capitalized correctly (that's very important to a no-life like myself). In short, they should switch places. Thanks in advance! —La Pianista ♫ ♪ 21:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Will do tomorrow, sleepy time now. A lot of debating the health care reform today, all on Facebook. :/ —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 05:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Done! —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 17:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

ITN edit

The Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act of 2010 has passed the House but not the Senate--so we would be responsible to direct people (in bold) to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the primary legislation which has passed both. Consider using one of the other two suggested blurbs until that happens (later this week).   — C M B J   06:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Done, thanks muchly —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:24, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Cheers.   — C M B J   06:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

USS President edit

USS President (1800) will soon go to FAC. I need someone like you (who knows what they're doing) to look it over. When you have time of course. TIA. --Brad (talk) 00:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Brad, of course I'll look it over, probably this weekend. School is hectic at the moment. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 16:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Re:Its official edit

 
Hello, The ed17. You have new messages at TomStar81's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TomStar81 (Talk) 05:52, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:39, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Byzantine-Sassanid War of 602–628 edit

Hi ed. You left some comments here and have not yet supported or opposed, but the article is now at the time limit and ought to be closed. I'm holding off until you and Auntieruth either support or oppose since there are already two support votes. If you and Ruth support that will provide consensus to promote. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


Random Picture of the Day edit

 
Our current logo.

Hello, The ed17/Archives! Just reminding you that you are listed as a member of the Random Picture of the Day! It would be great if you could add a picture or too! Put the template on your user page with {{User:Presidentman/potd/template}}, and encourage other users to add pictures. You can also put our userbox on your userpage using: {{User:Presidentman/Ubx/RPOTD}}. Hopefully you'll help out! - Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 21:48, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

{{quote box}} edit

Ed, the problem has been discussed - it is not a problem with the template itself, but rather a problem with the wikimedia software that occurs when a div-based template is indented. in my estimation, reverting the change breaks far more templates (since {{quote box2}} and {{quote box3}} are now redirected through here). could you please restore the merged version? if there is a particular place you are having trouble with this template, let me know. I'm happy to fix it. --Ludwigs2 23:14, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I see haha. I just thought that the old format would do fine until the fix was deployed. :) My apologies. I'm not having a problem with it, I just really don't like the look of the new version. The source needs a dash at minimum, and I would prefer the spacing between lines and right-aligned source...but that may be only me. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 23:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
no, it's not just you. there seems to be some disagreement about the aesthetics for the thing, which is why I opened that thread. maybe I should make up a few test cases for examples of different looks, and we can all play with them and decide on the proper thing. the only problematic issue is the dash is that (currently) the various versions of the template and redirects have different looks - most of the Quote Box2 and Quote Box3 had manually added dashes, whereas the original Quote Box had an automatic dash - any way if goes we're going to have to AWB some changes in to get consistency. Once we decide on the correct format, we can do that.
I'm off for a bit, but this evening I'll make some test examples; the merged template has options for arbitrary CSS, so we can play with different looks. --Ludwigs2 01:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I've replied there. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 19:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Involved ACR closure edit

Ed, in the future I'd like to ask you to refrain from closing ACRs in which you are involved. Yes, this ACR has sat for a month, but there are plenty of uninvolved coordinators who could have closed it instead of one who had commented such as you did at the review. As a general rule, if I leave more than a one-line comment at a review, I will not be the one to close it. In fact, if you have noticed, I am not even closing ACRs for WP:OMT articles (even if I did not comment at all). While I do not see a problem with this closure, having an involved coordinator close a review is something we should strive to avoid at all possible. -MBK004 02:34, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't view it as "involved" given that I only commented on MOS issues with the refs, but I won't close if I comment next time. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 19:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
I can see your point there, but you can certainly see where I am coming from, can't you? -MBK004 21:33, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I can. Sorry for not making that clear in the first post. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 05:47, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Help please... edit

I have just noticed a recent infusion of largely unformatted text with extremely poor referencing (including personal interviews) by a newbie to Jesse B. Oldendorf which also removed most of the formatting of the article. While my first instinct is to just revert it all on MOS grounds, would you mind taking a look at this and see if it can be salvaged or not. -MBK004 04:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Looks like Parsec got to it, sorry :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 19:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
You can still help, the newbie is still at it: Special:Contributions/Ussrangercv4, an extreme formatting mess using references that are not readily available and could be SPSs (including cruise books, which we have not allowed because the crew themselves published them). -MBK004 02:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
It doesn't look like he has added any content now. I think a cruise book would be fine in a "Further reading" section, right? I don't see a problem with the other books. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
He's using {{cite book}}, which is helpful. :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Upper Peninsula of Michigan edit

"(Undid revision 352136939 by Asher196 (talk) - this isn't controversial, and it's probably based on a U.S. gov't map; I've seen a similar one before.) (rollback | undo)"

Whatever happened to verifiable? "probably based on"? Asher196 (talk) 21:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Actually there was a question on the talk page as to the accuracy of the map. When I found that I could not verify the info, I removed the map. Asher196 (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
Yup, I have a lot of egg on my face. Replied on the talk page. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Lexington class edit

I have the book you wanted: US Cruisers. Friedman isn't talking class names very clearly but is most often talking about the design numbers. Answer this on the article's talk page and tell me what it is you want from the book. --Brad (talk) 22:35, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Replying there now. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:49, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

RE:It's Official edit

Hey, Ed, you mentioned something about FB debates involving healthcare reform. What's the group name? I'll join and have some fun w/ it. Cam (Chat) 05:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey Cam, sorry, I just checked my email after seeing this post. I was having like three different debates on various status' of mine, but they've now run their course. Sorry man. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 22:03, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

FAR checkback edit

Hi Ed! A user has left some responses and a couple of questions in reply to your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Biman Bangladesh Airlines/archive1. Would you mind checking back to see if your concerns have been resolved, or if not, what further action is needed? Thanks in advance! Dana boomer (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Dana, long time no see! Congrats on your appointment as a FAR delegate. I've replied there; thanks for the poke! —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations! edit

 
Coordinator of the
Military history Project,
March 2010—October 2010

Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks Tom. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:12, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Congrats on another elected term as a coordinator Ed! Cam (Chat) 02:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Cam! I'm planning to get to Kongo this Wednesday or Thursday; I've got work and a deadly combination of papers and exams due on both Monday and Tuesday. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 03:26, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Congrats Ed, and thank you for your support at the election, very much appreciated. See you around the Milhist pages! Ranger Steve (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations to you as well. I'm glad you decided to stand for to be a coordinator! —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 20:24, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you edit

  The WikiProject Barnstar
In gratitude of your service as a coordinator for the Military history Project from September 2009 to March 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Non-consensual move edit

Ed17, I noted that you were the closing admin on the previous move discussion regarding Independence Day (film). It has been moved again to Independence Day (1996 film), without any discussion, and the origianl page was changesd, so only admins can revert the move. Could you please restore the page to Independence Day (film), and if possible, move protect it? Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Note that the talk page is still at Talk:Independence Day (film)! Sheesh! - BilCat (talk) 23:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Done after a ton of reverts. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 01:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Independence_Day_(film)#Request_move.2C_part_2 <-- FYI —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks much! - BilCat (talk) 05:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

yamato FAC edit

Ed, I've got a problem. A huge problem.

Brad has opposed the article's FAC on the grounds that it relies too much on combinedfleet for its referencing. I know this is short notice, but I need you to pour through every resource you have on Yamato and determine if any of the cf references can be replaced by other references. Cam (Chat) 04:26, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

If you have The Battleship Yamato, I need stuff from it added ASAP. Cam (Chat) 04:28, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Meh, the libraries I have access to aren't huge, they just happen to have the books I need. It'll be really nice next year. I will have access to Carleton University Library (3 million+ holdings), the University of Ottawa library (5 million+ holdings), plus the National Archives of Canada (20 million+ books, 1000 TerraBytes of Digital Records). With close to 30,000,000 books on hand, it will be nice, to say the least... Cam (Chat) 03:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:Type N3-S ships edit

Speedy and xfd can overlap. This clearly fits G8 as it's a template with a redlinked parent. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:17, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

That wasn't my argument, see the TFD. Yes, I know it fits G8, but there's also IAR. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 18:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Mendip Hills FAR edit

Hi again Ed! Thank you for the congrats above - my apologies for not responding sooner. It's great to see you commenting on the FAR page - we need more reviewers over there, so bring your friends :) As for another "poke" - you commented on the Mendip Hills FAR (located here). It has since moved to the FARC section, so your opinion on whether it should retain it's FA status is welcome! Also, have the primary source concerns on the Biman article been taken care of, or just the issues you listed specifically? Thanks again, Dana boomer (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Dana, I'm walking out the door right now, but I'll get to this tonight. Thanks! —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I've commented —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 00:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for commenting on Mendip Hills. They've done a bit more work, if you want to take another look. The main reason I stopped by, though, was to see if your primary source concerns had been resolved on the Biman article. If not, could you be a bit more detailed with the issues you see? The article is currently getting a nice prose tune-up, and looks to be headed for keep, so it would be good to make sure any further concerns you have are resolved soon. Dana boomer (talk) 00:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
My apologies, I must be under the influence or something. :-) I've added a full slate of major concerns; I hope that the article is not promoted without these being fixed. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Yamato FAC edit

Your grammatical syntax is causing some confusion in the FAC. Therefore, it is my duty to do this:

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Enjoy. Cam (Chat) 05:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I can taste the salt from the scales even! :-) Sorry dude, and thanks for cleaning up my mess. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you edit

Thank you very much for your support on the coordinator elections. I look forward to working with you for the next six months, at least. – Joe N 13:59, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your support as well. Thanks for all you've done at ACR. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 21:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010 edit

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter edit

 

We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly.   Hunter Kahn (submissions) leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B.   TonyTheTiger (submissions) currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/Archives/26&oldid=1088220025"