Broken link

The link is broken. The "v" in Vector.js should be lowercased. But it would be even better to say something like the following, so that the link would still work if they used a skin other than Vector:

Page too long and unwieldy? Try adding nominations viewer to your scripts page.

Gary (talk · scripts) 03:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hey Gary King, I've just added your suggested wording. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 03:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 May newsletter

The second round of the 2018 WikiCup has now finished. Most contestants who advanced to the next round scored upwards of 100 points, but two with just 10 points managed to scrape through into round 3. Our top scorers in the last round were:

  •   Cas Liber, our winner in 2016, with three featured articles
  •   Iazyges, with nine good articles and lots of bonus points
  •   Yashthepunisher, a first time contestant, with two featured lists
  •   SounderBruce, a finalist last year, with seventeen good topic articles
  •   Usernameunique, a first time contestant, with fourteen DYKs
  •   Muboshgu, a seasoned competitor, with three ITNs and
  •   Courcelles, another first time contestant, with twenty-seven GARs

So far contestants have achieved twelve featured articles between them and a splendid 124 good articles. Commendably, 326 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2018 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met; most of the GARs are fine, but a few have been a bit skimpy.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:10, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Corisande or Charis

Please let's discuss it here, before you edit the article again. After all, you are the one proposing to change a long-standing version, so I think you should be the one to convince me. Debresser (talk) 18:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Debresser: He was Charis' spymaster. I'm literally listening to that audiobook right now; yesterday had the chapter on him waking up. See also Wikia: "After Emerald joined the Empire of Charis, he became a senior advisor to Emperor Cayleb, as Minister of Imperial Intelligence and senior spymaster of the Empire." Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 19:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Well done. But you are forgetting that he was Corisande's spymaster before he was resurrected and started working for Charis. And again, per WP:BRD, DO NOT revert till such time as you have established consensus for your change. Debresser (talk) 14:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I’m scared that I got the references from the title of the section. Wanna link to the edit so I can weigh in as a 3O from someone who’s read the books extensively...Ealdgyth - Talk 14:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
See last few edits on the Safehold article. By the way, this editor also reverts other parts of my edit, which he should not do! Debresser (talk) 14:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
It is very simple. At the moment he is resurrected he was still Corisande's spymaster. Afterwards, Merlin won him over to the Charis side. Debresser (talk) 14:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
All this should be on the article talk page, will reply there. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

ARA Rivadavia

Hi. After all changes concerning ARA Rivadavia, Talk:ARA Rivadavia (1911) has been orphaned, with the renamed article ARA Rivadavia now accompanied by Talk:ARA Rivadavia (disambiguation) on a redirect. I am sure that that was not your intention, so would be grateful that you can sort that out, please. Davidships (talk) 02:38, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Definitely not! I've just fixed it. Thanks for pinging! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:54, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2018

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018

 
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

German war effort arbitration case opened

You were recently listed as a party to or recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Evidence. Please add your evidence by May 30, 2018, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/German war effort/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018

Facto Post – Issue 12 – 28 May 2018
 

ScienceSource funded

The Wikimedia Foundation announced full funding of the ScienceSource grant proposal from ContentMine on May 18. See the ScienceSource Twitter announcement and 60 second video.

A medical canon?

The proposal includes downloading 30,000 open access papers, aiming (roughly speaking) to create a baseline for medical referencing on Wikipedia. It leaves open the question of how these are to be chosen.

The basic criteria of WP:MEDRS include a concentration on secondary literature. Attention has to be given to the long tail of diseases that receive less current research. The MEDRS guideline supposes that edge cases will have to be handled, and the premature exclusion of publications that would be in those marginal positions would reduce the value of the collection. Prophylaxis misses the point that gate-keeping will be done by an algorithm.

Two well-known but rather different areas where such considerations apply are tropical diseases and alternative medicine. There are also a number of potential downloading troubles, and these were mentioned in Issue 11. There is likely to be a gap, even with the guideline, between conditions taken to be necessary but not sufficient, and conditions sufficient but not necessary, for candidate papers to be included. With around 10,000 recognised medical conditions in standard lists, being comprehensive is demanding. With all of these aspects of the task, ScienceSource will seek community help.

Links

 
OpenRefine logo, courtesy of Google

To subscribe to Facto Post go to Wikipedia:Facto Post mailing list. For the ways to unsubscribe, see below.
Editor Charles Matthews, for ContentMine. Please leave feedback for him. Back numbers are here.
Reminder: WikiFactMine pages on Wikidata are at WD:WFM. ScienceSource pages will be announced there, and in this mass message.

If you wish to receive no further issues of Facto Post, please remove your name from our mailing list. Alternatively, to opt out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)