User:TenzinTashi5/sandbox/types

@Bladesmulti: I added my Enneagram_of_Personality assessments to your caricature descriptions. I believe wikipedia has a Type 5 abundance. These types express themselves in body speach and mind, I belive there is behavioral genetics going on here with this modern model of sins and virtues. TenzinTashi5 (talk) 23:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

• 
  Original picture removed; Image:Fozzierowlf.jpg Those are buddies. Buddies work together. Any combination in the Sequence Type 5824175 most often or Type 369 or adjacent numbers
• 
  Original picture removed; File:Animal (Muppet).jpg There is the frustrated type who shows his teeth
• 
  Original picture removed; File:Beaker (Muppet)-en.jpg There is the new begginer who does'n get a thing
• 
  There is the is the frustrated type who bites
• 
  Original picture removed; Dr. Bunsen Honeydew File:Dr. Bunsen Honeydew.jpg There is the Doctor with his PHDY, who knows everything and he will tell you all ~Type 5
• 
  Original picture removed; File:Fozzie Bear.jpg There is the nice guy who will do his best, like Jonathan
• 
  Then there are the Austalians who don't know how the rest of the world works
• 
  Original picture removed; File:MissPiggy.jpg And there is Mr Pig who tries to hit everybody in the head with most convincing arguments Yes Type7
• 
  Then there are the original editors they see everything upside down, and confuse everybody, like 74 ~Type 5
• 
  And here is Doctor Dolittle.
• 
  Original picture removed; File:ScooterMuppet.jpg There is the young genius - as he thinks of himself, in reality a Nerd or a Geek (very hard to convince them about anything.) ~Type 5 or 1
• 
  There are the OLD wikipedians who knows best (and they usually do)
• 
  Original picture removed; File:Statler and Waldorf.jpg There is the OLD wikipedian who knows best (and they usually do)
• 
  The editor who has multiple a accounts
• 
  and there are the editors who allways get their way by printing WP:This and WP:That ( often not quite true but it sounds good.) ~Type 1
• 
  There are the editors who are draged to the ANI and spend a lot of time defending themselves somehow there. (any in Type denial)
• 
  There are the completely Angelic editors, polite and loving like Sagaciousphil‎ and Yngvadottir (if is not busy) - (Very rare)
• 
  And there are the picture cleaners who inconsiderately remove pictures and don't replace them with others, like XX
• 
  And there are the editor who left or got banned by the banners
• 
  There is the orphan editor who is alone and nobody cares for him or her
• 
  Original picture removed; File:SamTheEagle.jpg And There Is The Eagle, who is ...a pompous as. They may know things or may not, but because they believe that they are better, smarter, or more important than other people, it really doesn't matter. They can be spotted at Christmas time. Although they have contact with a lot of editors, never get a Christmas greeting. Or a Happy New Year greating. One could mention probably names here but we leave this link Red. ~Type 5
• 
  And here is the one that gave up.
• 
  Here we are

File:Marcel Duchamp Mona Lisa LHOOQ.jpg

L.H.O.O.Q. (1919), one of Marcel Duchamp's readymades.