 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
- "What if person A had 10% of his/her edits as article creation/expansion and more as minor (but not just spelling stuff) but didn't work on FACs, but perhaps rather more obsure articles...Oh well, guess that just another Oppose. What if person B almost always makes formating edits/spelling and vandal patrol, but out of his of large articles (say 1%) edits included 3 to a FAC that was promoted...that makes a lot of sense...right..." --Voice-of-All
Any Featured Article or *FA is a new standard that Tawker will be using as a standard for voting at Requests for Adminship. It states that Any featured articles that the candidate has helped to write are simply a bonus to their contributions.
Rationale edit
- Supporting a candidate simply because they have a single featured article under their belt gives support to users who may not necessarily deserve it, and denies support to candidates who may deserve adminship.
- While knowledge of article writing is essential to being an admin, one must consider that writing featured article is not the only way to contribute to Wikipedia.
- Voting on the basis of whether or not a candidate has a featured article discriminates against users who prefer to contribute by expanding more obscure articles that have little chance of being featured.