Creating list of "To do" for my adoption practical so that I may keep track and mark when done. Then I will submit when completed.
List taken directly from the "Practical" that Jackson Peebles created for educational purposes. I made this list because the other one is used for all the adoptees and I can't make edits to it.
Done:* Create one (or more, of course) non-stub page from scratch. You may use the article creation wizard or do it by hand. However, there must not be substantial errors in this page, and it must be a real page. This means that it has to be notable, wikified, referenced, etc. It can be start-class, but it must not merit any maintenance tags.
Added
Joe "Tiger" Patrick II to the article list page as instructed
Not done:* Bring one article up to GA or FA status (you must be the main cause of this). WORKING ON SAFETYVILLE ARTICLE FOR THIS
Not done:* Untag five pages. This doesn't mean that you just untag them. You have to actually fix the problem. You may think you're being sneaky and take a bunch of pages that simply need grammatical copyedits, but I consider this to be very valuable work and do count it. Other options include adding references (much needed), turning lists to prose, etc. - the possibilities are really quite boundless.
- [1] I worked on this all day yesterday. I was able to remove 2 or 3 different tags (context, and notability is all I remember) plus created a lead, sections, and drove to the safety center to take pictures to add pictures. I also added quite a few refs (which helped to establish notability) I made over 40 edits here.
- [2] linked to and then removed orphan tag [3]
- [4] linked one page to the other and removed orphan tag from the appropriate article.
- [5] untag article after expanding text and adding more cite refs
Not done:* Participate in three Requests for Comment and two Requests for Adminship. This participation may not simply consist of "support per nom" or "support per (insert user's) criterion" for RfAs, and the RfCs must be well-thought-out and show consideration of both views.
Not done:* Revert fifteen instances vandalism. You may use semi-automated tools, including Twinkle and STiki.
Not done:* Fix twenty-five pages using AutoWikiBrowser (this can include any number of items).
Not done:* Welcome and/or warn and/or correctly report twenty-five users. You may only welcome users with at least two edits (to conserve server resources, per community consensus but not policy) and the welcomes must be appropriate (for instances, vandals should be greeted with the vandalism welcome and constructive editors should be greeted with the constructive editor welcome - all others can be generic, but page links are appreciated). Warnings can be any number of things but may not take place before the user has been greeted and must assume good faith unless there is substantial evidence otherwise. Remember not to bite newcomers and not to tag experienced users (unless you explicitly reject these notions).
Not done:* Alternatives: If you think of an idea that is not listed above but seems reasonable, let me know. Odds are high that I will like it and accept it. This includes starting a project, bot creation (that'd be awesome), running a grant, creating useful templates, or any number of other items.