User:Strillonator/sandbox

Notes regarding information privacy

• In the way classification was categorized in the article, I thought Sexuality/Sexual Preference/Gender Identification might have been equally relevant.
• Cable TV section:  “IP TV” not linked
• Medical section:  HIPAA and HITECH ACT could be linked
• Safe Harbor Program section:  “Historically, …… 95/46/EU” needs citation and links.  The section is also difficult to understand.
• “Policy appliances”… who wrote this?? Sounds like translations into English from another language.
• Commercial linking to Commerce an incorrect link.
• Laws: no USA laws listed.
• Authorities: no USA authorities listed.
• The whole article seems poorly written and difficult to read.

Notes regarding Data Re-Identification (Tiffany)

• When describing the process of de-identification, an example could be useful;
• “Others do not think…” would be interesting to indicate who the “others” are;
• Wow – this is much better written and cited, compared to Information Privacy.
• Probably needs more developing, more info and citing.
• First couple sentences in the Netflix paragraph need citing? In general, I think needs more development, and there are links that don’t appear to work.

Notes regarding Week 3 Citation training

• I made 2 edits on the page Information Privacy wiki page
• I insert a Notes w/ Reference section in my Sandbox