 | This is a user sandbox of Sjherath. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Climate Change 1. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Ecology - Article is unbiased and does not sway towards a particular position. Sources are provided to support claims
2. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Although majority of the content found in this article is cited appropriately, not every fact is referenced with a proper citation. This could be due to some information being considered as general knowledge and therefore does not need a citation. Source number 32 was found to be inappropriately sourced.
Ecology
1. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
"the circles of sustainability approach treats ecology as more than the environment 'out there'. It is not treated as separate from humans." This provided statement is not provided with a reference at all. And not enough citations are found in this article that support claims made.
2. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Is there any close paraphrasing or plagiarism in the article? Yes, links provided work and go to reliable sources. Close paraphrasing or plagiarism was not detected.
Effects of Climate Change on Plant Biodiversity 1. Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? - The information identified comes from peer reviewed articles. Sources are neutral as most sources comes from environmental departments and universities, and bias was not seen. Sjherath (talk) 20:21, 3 May 2017 (UTC)