User:Senra/Sandbox/experimental


Summary of this case to-date edit

The above summary is my own personal interpretation of the responses --Senra (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Updates:

  • three new statements --Senra (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
  • three more statements --Senra (talk) 16:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
  • Fixed incorrect summary (Zhang) and added missing diff (SandyGeorgia) --Senra (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
  • No more updates to this chart will be made after today due this --Senra (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Note: As previously stated, this is my own personal interpretation and given my own view stated above, naturally may be biased although I have tried to remain dispassionate. If anyone feels I have misrepresented them, please contact me, as others have already done. I will then modify the table accordingly --Senra (talk) 14:14, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

* Admin? column is Yes if editor is an admin or No if not an admin

  • Admin issue column may be Yes meaning admin issue was mentioned in the editors statement or blank meaning editor did not state anything on admin issue
  • Civility column Yes meaning editor stated civility was an issue or blank civility was not stated in the statement
  • Note that the combined response of Admin issue and civility recorded above may be two blanks, two yeses or one blank and one yes
  • Case? may be Yes arbs should take the case, No arbs should not take the case or Neutral meaning editor was not clear whether a case should be taken or not
  • diffs are not intended to be clicked on without looking at the editors response to guide context. Instead, use the diffs column to determine if the editor used diffs as part of their response