User:RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive40

Rfa edit

I am very impressed by your statement that "I prefer inclusionists than deletionists in RFA anytime because they are more careful with the delete button." (& I would be just as impressed if you hadn;t happenned to mention me favorable in connection with this.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)

yes, I', trying to think of a way to support while still saying he is not quite stable enough. DGG ( talk ) 17:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, RenamedUser jaskldjslak901. You have new messages at Blanchardb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Macaulay edit

Thanks for braving a cricket article to do the review! I've responded. Mainly with "don't knows" I'm afraid. --Sarastro1 (talk) 21:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Aaliyah edit

Hello! SS Music is a unreliable source ?--ΛΛLIYΛH (talk) 21:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Changing my Username. edit

Dear Secret,

Please let me know how can i change my username or have a parallel username to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pearllysun%7Cpearllysun.

Regards Pearll's sun

History of Miami edit

On my talk page you asked about a book. This is a really common book. Contact me through my web page: www.grovebook.com GroveGuy (talk) 01:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sunset Boulevard (film) edit

Thanks for letting me know you were considering FAR. I appreciate that you did. Looking at the article, it has changed considerably in some areas since it was promoted to FA. A review would be a good idea for that reason alone. My Wikipedia time is very limited at the moment and basically I pop in and out as time permits. I can't commit to something like this because I could end getting half way through it and then not be available to continue. I'll keep an eye out for any review, and will participate if I'm able to. Thanks again. Rossrs (talk) 07:10, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback edit

Hello, RenamedUser jaskldjslak901. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Thing That Should Not Be 2.
Message added 23:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~Nerdy Science Dude 23:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

FYI edit

See Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship#Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cliffmore. –xeno^talk 20:08, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback edit

Hello, RenamedUser jaskldjslak901. You have new messages at The Thing That Should Not Be's talk page.
Message added 18:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ANI edit

Hi,
On ANI you comment "It is deemed by the community that his edits are disruptive." Isn't this putting the cart before the horse? Do you find my edits disruptive? If so why? Rich Farmbrough, 23:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC).

Because it was deemed by the community that your edits were disruptive, I myself have no comment on your edits. Secret ^account 00:00, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

OK thanks. The reason I queried is that !votes are generally to gauge community consensus - so gauging the community consensus to make the !vote is rather pre-empting the decision. many thanks for your response. Rich Farmbrough, 01:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC).

FAC for 2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl edit

Hi. Thanks for your comments on my Featured Article Candidacy for 2010 PapaJohns.com Bowl. I believe I have addressed your concerns; could you review and let me know if your concerns have been satisfied? –Grondemar 15:54, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi edit

Hi. Thanks for your concern. I have been really, really ill for quite some time, but I'm better. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 04:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Email edit

I just sent you an email. Probably seems slightly random since we haven't had much interaction before, but hopefully it'll make more sense when you read it. Alzarian16 (talk) 17:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alansohn 2 edit

Hi, it appears you have !voted twice at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Alansohn 2, once in the support section and once in the neutral section. Can you please strike one out? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

It was removed during a round of editing for "formatting" concerns. Thanks Secret ^account 00:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh okay, thanks. Eagles 24/7 (C) 00:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

not here edit

Heh. I didn't even notice that. Thanks. :) Corvus cornix_talk 21:49, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced US sport BLPs edit

As requested:

Thanks for any help you can provide.The-Pope (talk) 02:09, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

You beat me to it. Just posted at WP:AN => 400 Basketball uBLPs. 100 American football uBLPs. For other subjects see BLP by WikiProject.Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 08:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Reference in external links edit

I know from experience references in external links just don't cut it. Articles such as Víctor Marté will be re-tagged as a UBLP in time. Your best to create a reference section with the link, even if it's a bare link. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 08:47, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Request for input edit

Hi. I would appreciate your input on http://admintools.wikia.com/wiki/Admin_Tools_Wiki:Requests_for_rights/Heymid - thanks! — $Jeff G. ツ$ 14:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation edit

		The WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation
		Awarded to Secret, for participation in the 2010 WikiCup. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

It's raining thanks spam! edit

Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:30, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Rewriting edit

You've expressed your willingness to rewrite. What do you want to do at this point? Uncle G (talk) 15:17, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

1Malaysia edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Monkeyassault (talk) 03:01, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

re:Welcome Back edit

It's been quite some time, Jaranda. Glad to see Wikipedia is still as productive as ever! —Deckiller (t-c-l) 01:22, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Sadly, I probably won't be working on sports articles anytime soon. I did want to make a push to revitalize the Patriots article, since it was my first FA contribution, but time is such a huge issue nowadays. I might try to give the Square-Enix project a boost, but I'll probably stick to general copy-editing, reviewing, and admin duties for now. My writing skills are a bit rusty, and copy-editing will certainly help. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 01:40, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Judaism at AN3 edit

I disagree slightly with your comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Greyshark09 and User:Lisa reported by User:Malik Shabazz (Result: both G and L cautioned), but thank you for taking the time to look. Your suggestion would have been reasonable, but I think we can get away without blocking in this case. Also, I am not sure why you put "warning" in scare quotes - the edit summary was jargon, but there was discussion at both user talk pages.

On a happier note, does this mean that you are thinking about standing for adminship? Let me know if you do? - 2/0 (cont.) 04:15, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Follow Me, Boys! edit

I don't see the copyvio at Follow Me, Boys!; please direct me to the salient points. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 04:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

this version was a copyvio Secret ^account 17:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

plot from there Secret ^account 18:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Harmony Cove edit

Hi please unlock this and paste the following into it:

Harmony Cove (62°19′S 59°12′W / 62.317°S 59.200°W / -62.317; -59.200) is a cove entered between Harmony Point and The Toe on the west side of Nelson Island, in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica. It was named by American sealers in about 1820 after the sealing vessel sealing vessels headquartered at Harmony Cove during the 1820-21 season.

This article incorporates public domain material from "RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive40". Geographic Names Information System. United States Geological Survey. {{SouthShetlands-geo-stub}} Category:Geography of Antarctica

I'm not longer an adminstrator, ask someone else. Sorry. Secret ^account 19:32, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Jo-Jo Morrissey DYK nomination edit

Hello! Your submission of Jo-Jo Morrissey at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 28bytes (talk) 00:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Jo-Jo Morrissey edit

On 18 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jo-Jo Morrissey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that prior to the 1933 Cincinnati Reds season, a newspaper reported that Jo-Jo Morrissey "developed amazingly", yet he finished fifth in the league in errors and batted .230? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 12:02, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco is now a FAC edit

Hi, since you reviewed Pedro II of Brazil when it was a FAC I thought you might be interested in taking a look at José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco. The article is about a 19th century Brazilian statesman and it is strongly related to Pedro II's article. Thus, you'll notice that the subject is similar and quite easy to follow. I'd like to see your opinion about it and whether you support or oppose its nomination as a FAC. Here is the page: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco/archive1. Thank you very much, --Lecen (talk) 23:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm very busy with classwork, will review when given the time (there's another article I want to review as well as it falls inside my expertise) Secret ^account 00:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

FAR edit

Hi Secret - Could you please revisit your comments at the The Notorious B.I.G. FAR (review page at Wikipedia:Featured article review/The Notorious B.I.G./archive1)? Gimme has responded to your comments, and so any further comments or a keep/oppose declaration would be appreciated. Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 14:17, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your ArbCom guide edit

Please append the {{Template:ACE2010}} template to the top of your election guide (User:Secret/2010 ArbCom Elections) so that people can navigate the guides and election pages more easily. Thanks, Sven Manguard _Talk 05:37, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you! edit

Thank you for your support at my RfA last week. I'll do everything I can to live up to your expectations and if you ever need help from a janitor please feel free to drop me a line! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 22:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Rfc: Nyttend edit

A proposed closing statement has been posted here. Please could you confirm whether you support or oppose this summary. Thanks. Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Grace Sherwood FAR edit

Hi Secret - If you could revisit your comments at the Grace Sherwood FAR (review page located at WP:Featured article review/Grace Sherwood/archive1) it would be much appreciated. After the push to get it to FARC early, there has been no activity on the FAR page since the day it was moved. Thanks, Dana boomer (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Fat Man edit

Hi Secret, if you have the time, could you please clarify your opinion on The Fat Man Who Never Came Back's block, now that he has commented on the block. Cheers, - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 09:43, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you edit

Thank you very much for your support and your kind words in your voter guide, as well as your other thoughtful observations. They are very much appreciated. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Guide feedback edit

Heya, if you haven't seen it, you might enjoy the discussions going on at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Feedback#Voter guides. :) --El on ka 04:25, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Laptopmaker's RfA edit

I see you closed it per WP:NOTNOW; good call. I assume you'll be leaving him a note on his talk page to explain why? He doesn't seem very aware of policy. He might think it was an error and re-add himself; which he is allowed to do. So it's better to tell him to avoid the old Hokey Cokey. — Fly by Night (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

I warned him, was doing last minute paper and wiking at the same time. Secret ^account 19:40, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Award edit

The Cherry Impact Event

I give this award to Secret for his prescience at having a guide most in line with the mind of the community at the 2010 Arbitration Committee Elections. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

wikicup ideas.... edit

I am looking at ways of promoting the improvement of core encyclopedia content over trivia with the wikicup next year (see Wikipedia_talk:WikiCup/Scoring#Okay_-_bombs_away) (and I always prefer carrots to sticks). The wikicup rewards audited content such as DYKs, GAs and FAs. I have proposed bonus multipliers for subjects related to core content. The trick is trying to come up with a category that can be checked quickly (yes/no) to see if the article qualifies...and one that can't be gamed. I thought you may be intrigued at the proposal and comment on the categories proposed thus far (given previous interest in WP:ACID etc.) Casliber (talk · contribs) 11:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of African Americans in Davenport, Iowa for deletion edit

The article African Americans in Davenport, Iowa is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/African Americans in Davenport, Iowa (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Hotel St. Pierre edit

Hi, for your consideration. The text on the deleted article Hotel St. Pierre has received permission via OTRS (ticket nr. 2010122810014614). Awaiting your reply. -- Kind regards, Taketa (talk) 23:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

I'm no longer an adminstrator, sorry. Secret ^account 15:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Restored. 7 00:55, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States edit

Hello, RenamedUser jaskldjslak901/Archive40! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! edit

Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 20:54, 6 January 2011 (UTC)