A tour of Wikipedia, using navigation-boxes (navboxes) and annotations from me. Read the yellow, skim and sample the blue.
Maps edit
These are the grand overview-style entry-points, to the worldviews and philosophies that drive Wikipedia. They're not the origin of all we do, but they are the map, such as it is.
Archetypes edit
These archetypes (and more) all exist, and have to work together. It's great when they balance, and often aggravating/unhealthy (for the project, and the editors) when they don't.
(Images from the meta:Research:Editor Lifecycles study)
Reading edit
Numerous ways to navigate the encyclopedia have been inherited and construed.
Help edit
And many guides to the many Help systems have been written. (Or see Wikipedia:Editor's index to Wikipedia to be overwhelmed by them all-in-one-page.)
(v · t · e)
(v · t · e)
P, G, and S edit
And then there are the manuals themselves. The Policies Guidelines & Styleguides are a glorious mixture of: technical recommendation, summarized precedent of older discussions, nuanced philosophical perspective, and practical how-to. [We used to have the phrase "descriptive, not prescriptive" somewhere in there,1234 but it was too zen, and was excised a few years ago. ╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ So it goes.]
| Content | |
|---|---|
| Formatting | |
| Images | |
| Layout | |
| Lists | |
| Legal | |
| Arts | |
| Music | |
| Regional | |
| Religion | |
| Science | |
| Sports | |
| Related | |
| Search | |
| Main namespace | |
|---|---|
| Other namespaces | |
| All namespaces | |
| Navboxes with templates |
|
| Inline images | |
| Help pages | |
| Related topics | |
| Search | |
Backstage edit
There are hundreds of projects engaged in cleaning and building specific-aspects, including:
And so many more; including the overwhelming:
If you're not [confused / inspired / worried / surprised / outraged / overwhelmed / hopeful] then you're not paying attention!
Essays edit
And with the essays, we loop back to philosophy. The essays are (almost) all nuggets of truth, but expressed in wildly different writer's voices. They variously offer: commonsense clarifications, fabulous epiphanies, metaphorical or satirical exaggerations, crude oversimplifications, besmirchments of opposing perspectives, and insights to laugh along with.
(It's rarely simple!
- Remain neutral.
- Try to work/smile/love/laugh/work alongside the other humans.
- Ignore nothing, detail is everything, but try not to get lost.)
See also, Exformation (4 min, YouTube) as brilliantly explained by Ze Frank. Our discussions (throughout Wikipedia, and throughout life) are overflowing with exformation. It's a useful thing to understand (wikt:exformation). The newcomers don't have any, and the regulars have too much!