My sole objective in providing content to Wikipedia articles on the companies I've worked for is to make the entries as authentic, accurate, and credible a ready reference as possible. Now, having been a Corporate Archivist at three major firms (Aetna Life & Casualty, IBM, and McKinsey & Co.) since 1990, I completely understand how the question of my objectivity in this regard is a legitimate concern for Wikipedians. I can only say that the proof is in the pudding - I am conversant with relevant Wikipedia policies on first party content creation (CoI, NPOV, V, NOR, etc.). Working with page editors, I have developed an editing process that vets my proposed edits on talk pages first, in order to solicit reader input, before promoting the content to the production page. I trust that a review of my editing track record will demonstrate that my ability to participate on these pages in an objective fashion should no longer be an active concern. But I will, of course, continue to count on Wikipedians to keep me honest. :-)