Wikipedia second chance edits (2-15) edit
No plagiarism detected this time around. Article is very well cited, but I did add 3 citations last time I edited it. Also, checking for plagiarism V.I.A copy and paste in Google seems to be rather ineffective because it is hard to tell who is plagiarizing who (99.95% of the time it is non-wikipedians plagiarizing Wikipedia). I checked the sources that were online-based and everything held up. I'm going to pick a less-developed article next time.
Wikipedia 2nd article (3-1-16) edit
-Added 2 sentences, a hyperlink, and a citation under "grazing"
-Entire section under "Integrated Method" plagiarized. Fixed + citation+hyperlink
-Added citation and sentence at end of "species introduction"
-Despite recommendation to expand the "worldview of article", I felt that issue was addressed substantially. I added a sentence anyway though
-No evidence of plagiarism throughout rest of article
Wikipedia 3rd article (3-31-16) edit
-Edited Imperata cylindrica (cogon grass)-Invasive species
-I added a citation for the second paragraph at the beginning
-Added small paragraph under "weed problems" with hyperlink and citation
-Added 2 sentences under 4th paragraph at "weed problems" with citation
-Added sentence in middle of same paragraph with citation and 2 hyperlinks
-Added another short paragraph under "weed control" and citation
-No plagiarism detected besides in the introduction (corrected)
Wikipedia 4th article (4-26-16) edit
- edited Alternanthera philoxeroides (alligator grass)
-Added source and hyperlink for first sentence of first paragraph
-Added sentence, source, and hyperlink at end of first paragraph
-Added paragraph with heading and citation under the first paragraph. This paragraph was combined with another paragraph on its description. The original paragraph I felt was subpar. It also did not have a citation.
- Added headings for the other paragraphs
-Added 2 sentences, citation, and 4 hyperlinks under "control"