This is a list of all GA reviews I have completed, or am in the process of completing.
|
;Quck fail criteria:
- # Has [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]
- # Is written [[WP:NPOV|neutrally]]
- # No valid cleanup tags
- # Is relatively stable with no edit wars
- # Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint
- [[File:Symbol support vote.svg|15px]]
- [[File:Symbol oppose vote.svg|15px]]
- Review
- Hold
- *I am placing this article on hold for seven days to allow you to fix the problems listed. If the work is completed before then, I will pass the article before the seven days are up. If no attempts are made to correct the problems, I will fail the article in seven days. If you are not finished within the seven days, I have no problem in extending the hold period to allow you to finish, as long as I see work is being carried out on the article.
- *To make it easier for me to see how much work has been done, please either strike each comment when the problem has been fixed or post a note underneath each item saying it is completed.
- *Feel free request to clarification on anything; you can leave comments on my talk page or here, as I have this page watchlisted.
- :~~~~
- The article [[]] you nominated as a [[Wikipedia:Good article nominations|good article]] has been placed on hold.[[Image:Symbol wait.svg|20px]] I haven't failed it because it's basically a good article, but there are some problems that need to be addressed. See [[Talk:/GA1]] for things needing to be addressed. ~~~~
- Pass
- This article is now a [[WP:GA|good article]]. Please consider helping [[WP:GAN]] by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at [[Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles]], and you can ask for the help of a [[WP:GAN/M|GAN mentor]] if you wish. Congratulations, ~~~~
|