Navajo.pete

The article Merilyn Gold has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:46, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Navajo pete

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Navajo pete, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Gromlakh (talk) 22:54, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Repost of Sydnee Capri

A tag has been placed on Sydnee Capri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Sydnee Capri is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Sydnee Capri saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of porn stars

Hello. I notice that you have created several articles for porn stars that do not appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines to notability. Before you create another porn star article, please review the Wikipedia:Notability (people) guideline, especially the section titled "Pornographic actors". Also please consult the Wikipedia:Reliable sources guideline. For example, the Chelsea Romero does not claim notability by citing reputable media sources or credible award nominations. The article can be deleted in its current form. • Gene93k (talk) 20:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sydnee Capri

I have nominated Sydnee Capri, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydnee Capri (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?

no:Mal:Slettnom • Gene93k (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chelsea Romero

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chelsea Romero, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable pornographic actress. See WP:PORNBIO.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chelsea Romero

I have nominated Chelsea Romero, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Romero. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Chelsea Romero

I have nominated Chelsea Romero, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chelsea Romero. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Morbidthoughts (talk) 08:43, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Sid Deuce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sid Deuce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sid Deuce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:49, 17 July 2011 (UTC)