This place is bizarre with how they treat people. Being blocked for wanting to clean up the many distortions on the Rachel Corrie page by people who are so grossly biased against her and just from the little bit on one person's userpage makes that pretty clear. A picture of her after she was killed states it as simply being "injured". And it is too important for these two people to include a picture of her burning the American flag. No reason for that to be there other than to paint her negatively. I'm not sure how a picture of her burning the American flag has to do with her being killed because she wanted to try to stop the Israeli government from tearing down civilian homes. Also, looking over what is considered vandalism or not. Disagreeing with how someone wrote something and it being factual does not make it vandalism just because you do not agree with it.
I also think it's incredibly unethical for people to be abusing Wikipedia this way by painting people in such a negative bias. And I do not know how to bring up how people are butchering her page or to have them blocked for vandalism so that makes it seem as though they are in the right because they can have people blocked.
Since people are incapable of using Wikipedia as a place to find information regarding Rachel Corrie, maybe these could help. http://www.counterpunch.org/karkar03152007.html