User:Mohkum Shabbir/sandbox1

Battle of Jalula
Part of the Muslim conquest of Sassanid empire
Date April 637. Location Jalula Iraq. Result Rashidun victory Territorial changes Territory east of Zagros mountain annexed by Rashidun Caliphate.
Belligerents
Sassanid Empire (Sassanid army)	Rashidun Caliphate (Rashidun army)
Commanders and leaders
Mihran Khurrazad	Hashim ibn Uthba Qa'qa ibn Amr
Strength
+12,000	12,000
Casualties and losses
Unknown but heavy	Unknown

Battle of Jalula was fought between Sassanid Empire and Rashidun Caliphate soon after conquest of Ctesiphon.

After withdrawal from Ctesiphon, the Persian armies gathered at Jalaula, north-east of Ctesiphon. Jalaula was a place of strategically importance from where routes led to Iraq, Khurasan and Azerbaijan. In April 637 Muslim invaded Jalula and after victory at battle of Jalula, out side Jalula fort, laid siege to the city which lasted for seven months.

Prelude

After the capturing Ctesiphon, several detachments were immediately sent west to capture Qarqeesia and Heet, forts at the border of Byzantine empire. Strong Persian garrisons north-east of Ctesiphon at Jalula and north of Tigris at Tikrit and Mosul, were threat to Muslim invaders. The greatest threat of all was the Persian concentration at strategic fort of Jalula. The Persian forces at Jalaula were commanded by General Mihran. His deputy was General Khurrazad a brother of General Rostam Farrokhzād, who commanded Persian forced at Battle of Qadisiyyah. Jalula was a town of great strategic importance, a bottle-neck to Northern Iraq. To have Jalula under the rule meant to have the gate to Northern Iraq. Persians therefore expected an attack on Jalula. Defense of Jalula was also very important for the strength of Empire and maintain order in the far flung frontiers of the Persian Empire. As instructed by the Caliph Umar, Saad ibn Abi Waqqas, Muslim commander in chief on Persian front, reported all the strategic situation to Umar. Who decided to deal with Jalula first, his plan was first to clear his rear before any decisive action further north against Tikrit and Mosul. Umar appointed Hashim ibn Uthba to the expedition of Jalula. Some time in April 637, Hashim marched at the head of 12,000 troops from Ctesiphon and made contact with Persians out side Jalula fort.

Battlefield

Battle Disposition

.

At Jalula, both the flanks of Persians and Muslims rested upon natural obstacles. Diyala River on east and broken ground on the west. Broken ground was unsuitable for cavalry and even the movement of infantry en mass was difficult and would have exposed them to Persian Fire-Power.

Opposing plans

Mihran, the Persian commander at Jalula, was a veteran general who had fought Muslims in Qadisiya and knew well of the Muslim's tactics. He dug entrenchments and placed Caltrops in front of them, to slow down Muslim advance. The Persian troops intended to weir Muslims down by letting them launch a frontal attack thus exposing themselves to Persian Archers and siege engines led Artillery. The caltrops also hindered the speed of Muslim cavalry and infantry. Mihran deployed his army in classical defensive formation with the intention of launching the attack when Muslims have suffered enough and the nucleus of their power has been destroyed. Hashim, the Muslim commander, on reaching the battlefield, analyzed that the Persians cannot be attacked from the flanks due to those natural barriers and approaching them from the front would be costly. He decided to lure the Persians out of defenses of entrenchments and caltrops. Hashim planned to launched a frontal attack and made a feint retreat under Persian fire and once the Persians are away from trench his cavalry will capture the bridge on the trench, cutting off Persian's escape route.

Battle

The battle begun with Muslim's frontal attack, after engaging for some time Muslims feint a retreat and fall back in an organized manner. Mihran, sensing the time is on hand to launch an offensive for him, ordered the entrenchments to be bridged. Once the Persian army had attained the battle formation he ordered a general attack. Up till now the battle had progressed as both the commanders had planned. Once Mihran engaged his troops in an open battlefield, Hashim decided to carry out his maneuver. He dispatched a strong cavalry regiment under one of his most illustrious cavalry commanders; Qaqa ibn Amr, to capture the bridge over the entrenchments. The bridge was not heavily guarded as virtually all the Persian troops available were used to assault Muslim main body. Qaqa maneuvered around Persian right flank quickly captured the bridge at their rear. The news of a strong Muslim cavalry detachment in their rear was a serious setback to Persian morale. Hashim launched a frontal attack with Muslim infantry while Qaqa stuck at Persian rear with his cavalry. Persian troops were trapped between Muslim army and the natural barriers on the battlefield. Nevertheless thousands of them managed to escape and reached the Jalula fortress.

• 
  The Muslim's Feint retreat
• 
  Persian Offensive
• 
  General Engagement
• 
  Qaqa's Outflanking Maneuver]].

Aftermath

Persian suffered heavy casualties and the battle ended in complete Muslim victory. After the battle Hashim laid siege to Jalula. Persian emperor Yazdegerd III was in no position to set a relief force to Jalula and the fortress surrendered to Muslims seven months later on the terms of annual payment of Jizya (tribute). After capturing Jalula Muslims captured Tikrit and Mosul, completing their conquest of Iraq. After conquest of Iraq (region west of Zagros mountains) Umar decided to consolidate the conquered territory. He apparently for the time being, did not wanted further conquest. He was almost on defensive until the consistent Persian raids in Iraq made him to launch a whole scale invasion of the Persian empire.

In Warfare

The maneuver that Qaqa pulled on the Persian resemble to some extent the Tǚlǚghma Maneuver of the Mongols. The way it was intended to occupy the rear of the Persian army to create psychological disorder is just like Battle of Gupta when Genghis Khan delivered a similar maneuver. This battle is also similar to Battle of Heliopolis in which Amr ibn al-Aas lure the Byzantines out of their fortifications showing a weaker front and using cavalry to outflank them. Battle of Nihawand was no exception as Nouman ibn Muqarrin did almost the same. Again the outflanking maneuver would be carried by Qaqa.
The tactics with which Arab fought is modernly known as Hammer and Anvil Tactics. In this an entity (most of the time Infantry in Muslim case) acting as an anvil would lure the enemy into certain area where another entity (Cavalry for Muslims) would act as a hammer and deliver the knock out punch. Almost all the Battles fought by Arab follow this general principle.

See also

• Islamic conquest of Persia
• Muslim conquests
• Sassanid Empire
• Rashidun Caliphate