Vandal box edit



Weegeerunner's corner on my own private TP edit

Speedy deletion nomination of Impressive (presentation program) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Impressive (presentation program) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Weegeerunner (talk) 17:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Your request was speedily declined by User:Hut 8.5 : "A7 does not apply to software" --Miraclexix (talk) 22:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Impressive (presentation program) .. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate .. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 21:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I got amazed how many revert-decisions and other decisions you did this day, at minute intervals, which partly, because of their very nature, did not last long. Your request for speedy deletion did not last long as well - a futile act. Every thing is fine, thank you. --Miraclexix (talk) 21:29, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Miraclexix. Weegeerunner (talk) 23:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Man - you can not be an advocate in battling your own private cases ... you have the power but not my anger or my despair. One can edit ones own talk page, by not altering its meaning: I am bold: WP:BRD Your biased claims are not worth being kept:WP:EQ I somehow had a gut feeling you may act the way of an revert-war, see: WP:3RR You are not here with higher edit/admin rights in wikipedia to lecture me:WP:EQ And you are currently not fighting vandalism: WP:DR Please abstain from WP:EW Maybe you have a point - but no undeserved bounty for you by blocking today: please see WP:DBF & WP:UHB --Miraclexix (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
As per WP:OWNTALK, Iaritmioawp advised me, "users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages." You are apparently unfamiliar with this behavioral guideline. If you continue disrupting my own talk page affairs I will contact an administrator and let him/her deal with your revert war. Everything is fine, thank you! --Miraclexix (talk) 00:51, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
Editor_assistance/Requests
  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
The original ANI-notice was read and subsequently deleted by me! Anonymous (IP) republishing was not neccessary! Please do not TROLL my talkpage!   A special thank you for your help in our battle against vandalism. Thank you so much for your efforts to improve this encyclopedia, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Please consider creating an account for yourself!

--Miraclexix (talk) 07:17, 16 April 2015 (UTC) Are you familiar with wp:bear? .. 87.11.141.146 (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

@Pseudonymous IP from Lazio, Rome:   A special thank you for your intimidating message on my talk page! Thank you so much for your efforts in our battle against vandalism, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Please create an account for yourself!

--Miraclexix (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Weegeerunner (talk) 03:33, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Eventually:   [1] --Miraclexix (talk) 09:53, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Please Stop edit

(..) Please stop turning people against me who are driving me away from the wiki, I beg you. Weegeerunner (talk) 01:40, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

  Dearest friend!
I like you and will try to help you with your problems if you request :) I realy do understand you and your problems! Again, I forgive you your behavior hole heartedly, as far as I am concerned you really really do not need any guilt conscience. I will go on and thank you again for your important work (you got your barnstar from me already).
I did not think of you a long, long time. Now that you hit my TP again, and am hogged by you again, what can I do now to help you?
A wise word, maybe: If someone furthermore and constantly feels the urge to concern him/herself with me as if I was against him/her, but in reality am just an unrelated co-editor in wikipedia, he or she might as well eventually need more professional help than my kind words, my understanding and my forgiveness can ever do good.
Be it as it may, if I can help you any further or you want more understanding, help and wisdom, please do not heasitate to contact me on my private talk page, at least this will document your basic understanding for what certain things are set up in wikipedia and for what not, as you had been noticed by admins for climbing the Reichstag dressed as a Spider-man already. I hope that helps. --Miraclexix (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
  Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly.

--Miraclexix (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Helpful links edit

When a vandal vandal fighter is feeling particularly jolly but still wishes to exert his powers in a cruel and unusual punishment, a WikiTrout may be used. --Miraclexix (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)