Slave Codes are the subset of laws regarding slavery and enslaved people, specifically in the Americas. Most slave codes were concerned the rights and duties of free people in regards to enslaved people. Slave codes left a great deal unsaid, with much of the actual practice of slavery being a matter of traditions rather than formal law.
The primary colonial powers all had slightly different slave codes. The French, after 1685, had the Code Noir specifically for this purpose[1]. The Spanish had some laws regarding slavery in Las Siete Partidas, although it was not comprehensive.[1] The English colonies largely had their own local slave codes, mostly based on the codes of either Barbados or Virginia.[2] After gaining independence, most states in the United States kept the slave codes they had before independence, although they began to diverge after that point.
In addition to the these national and state- or colony-level slave codes, there were city ordinances and other local restrictions regarding slaves.
Typical Slave Codes
editThere are many similarities between the various slave codes. The most common elements are:
- Movement Restrictions: Most regions required any slaves away from their plantations or outside of the cities they resided in to have a pass signed by their master (list of codes here). Many cities in the slave-states required slave-tags, small copper badges that enslaved people wore, to show that slaves were allow to go move about.[3]
- Marriage Restrictions: Most places restricted the marriage rights of enslaved people, ostensibly to prevent them from trying to change masters by marrying into a family on another plantation.[1]
- Prohibitions on Gathering: Slave codes usually prevented large groups of enslaved people away from their plantations outside of very specific circumstances.[4]
- Slave Patrols: In the slave-dependent portions of North America, varying degrees of legal authority backed patrols by plantation owners and other free whites to ensure that enslaved people were not free to move about at night, and to generally enforce the restrictions on slaves.[5]
- Trade and Commerce by Slaves: Initially, most places gave enslaved people some land to work personally and allowed them to operate their own markets. As slavery became more profitable, slave codes restricting the rights of enslaved people to buy, sell, and produce goods were restricted.[6] In some places, slave tags were required to be borne by enslaved people to prove that they were allowed to participate in certain types of work.[7]
Slave Codes of the English Colonies and the United States
editThere was no central English slave code, with each colony forming its own code. After winning their independence, the individual states ratified new constitutions, but their laws were generally a continuation of the laws those regions maintained prior to that point, their slave codes remaining unchanged.
The first comprehensive English slave code was from Barbados in 1661. Modifications of the Barbadian slave codes were put in place in Jamaica in 1664, and were then greatly modified in 1684. The Barbadian codes were copied by and South Carolina in 1691[2]. The South Carolina slave code served as the model for other colonies in North America.[4] In 1770, Georgia adopted the South Carolina slave code, and Florida adopted the Georgia code.
Virginia's slave codes were made in parallel to those in Barbados, with individual laws starting in 1667 and a comprehensive slave code passed in 1705.[8] The slave codes of the tobacco colonies (Delaware, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia) were modeled on the Virginia code.[4]
The northern colonies developed their own slave codes at later dates, with New York passing a comprehensive code in 1702.[9]
Slavery was restricted throughout the British Empire by the Slave Trade Act of 1807, which prevented trading slaves, but did not actually end slavery. In 1833, the Slavery Abolition Act ended slavery throughout the British Empire.
In the United States, there was a division between slave states and free states, roughly along the "Mason-Dixon Line", a division formalized in the Missouri Compromise (refer to Mason-Dixon line page for reference). At the start of the Civil War, there were 34 states in the United States, 15 of which were slave states, all of which had slave codes. The 19 free states did not have slave codes, although they still had laws regarding slavery and en-slaved people, covering such concerns as how to handle slaves from slave-states, whether they were runaways or with their owners.
Slavery was not banned nationwide in the United States until the Thirteenth Amendment was ratified on December 6, 1865. Earlier national laws greatly regulating slavery in the United States were the Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves on 1 January 1808 which made it a felony to import slaves from abroad, and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which required runaway enslaved people found in free states to be returned to their owners in the South.
French Slave Codes
editThe French colonies were the only portion of the Americas to have an effective slave code applied from the center of the empire. King Louis XIV applied the Code Noir in 1685, and it was adopted by Saint-Domingue in 1687 and the West Indies in 1687, Guyana in 1704, Reunion in 1723, and Louisiana in 1724. It was never applied in Canada, which had very few slaves. The Code Noir was developed in part to combat the spread of Protestantism and thus focuses more on religious restrictions than other slave codes. The Code was updated in 1724.[1]
New Orleans developed slave codes under Spain, France, and the United States, due Louisiana changing hands several times, resulting in a very complex set of slave codes. The needs of the locals usually held in favor of any outside laws.[1]
France abolished slavery after the revolution, first by freeing second-generation slaves in 1794.[10]
Spanish Slave Codes
editIn practice, the slave codes of the Spanish and Portuguese colonies were local laws, similar to those in other regions. There was an avenue for manumission for slaves, but it wasn't used notably more often than the avenues for manumission in other regions.
There was an overarching slave-code, Las Siete Partidas, which granted many specific rights to the slaves in these regions, but there is almost no record of it actually being used to benefit the slaves in the Americas. Las Siete Partidas was compiled in the thirteenth century, long before the colonization of the new world, and its treatment of slavery was based on the Roman tradition. Frank Tannenbaum, an influential sociologist who wrote on the treatment of slaves in the Americas treated the laws in Las Siete Partidas as an accurate reflection of treatment, but later scholarship has moved away from this viewpoint, arguing that it did not reflect actual practices.[11]
An attempt to unify the Spanish slave codes, the Codigo Negro, was cancelled without ever going into effect because it was too unpopular with the slave-owners in the Americas.[12]
The Laws of the Indies were an ongoing body of laws, modified throughout the history of the Spanish colonies, that incorporated many slave laws in the later versions.[1]
Specific Slave Codes
editSee also
edit- Anti-literacy laws in the United States
- Atlantic slave trade
- Conscription
- Convict leasing
- Coolie
- Debt bondage
- Forced labor
- Human trafficking
- Indentured servants
- International Year to Commemorate the Struggle against Slavery and its Abolition
- Slave narrative
- Slave rebellion
- Slave Trade Acts
- Slave trade
- Slavery at common law in the British Empire
- Slavery in Africa
- Slavery in Canada
- Slavery in the colonial United States
- Slavery in the United States
- Unfree labour
- Wage slavery
References
edit- ^ a b c d e f Ingersoll, Thomas N. (1995). "Slave Codes and Judicial Practice in New Orleans, 1718-1807". Law and History Review. 13 (1): 23–62. doi:10.2307/743955.
- ^ a b Rugemer, Edward B. (2013). "The Development of Mastery and Race in the Comprehensive Slave Codes of the Greater Caribbean during the Seventeenth Century". The William and Mary Quarterly. 70 (3): 430. doi:10.5309/willmaryquar.70.3.0429.
- ^ Harlan., Greene, (2004). Slave badges and the slave-hire system in charleston, south carolina, 1783-1865. Mcfarland. ISBN 0786440902. OCLC 226166849.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Christian, Charles M.; Bennet, Sari (1998). Black Saga: The African American Experience. Basic Civitas Books.
- ^ E., Hadden, Sally (2001). Slave patrols : law and violence in Virginia and the Carolinas. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674004701. OCLC 44860794.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Berlin, Ira (1991). The slaves' economy : independent production by slaves in the Americas. Morgan, Phillip D. London: Cass. p. 7. ISBN 0714634360. OCLC 255388170.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) - ^ Harlan., Greene,. Slave badges and the slave-hire system in Charleston, South Carolina, 1783-1865. Hutchins, Harry S., 1945-, Hutchins, Brian E. Jefferson, N.C. ISBN 0786417293. OCLC 53459029.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Greene, Jack P.; Morgan, Edmund S. (1976). "American Slavery, American Freedom: The Ordeal of Colonial Virginia". Political Science Quarterly. 91 (4): 742. doi:10.2307/2148833. ISSN 0032-3195.
- ^ Olson, Edwin (1944). "The Slave Code in Colonial New York". The Journal of Negro History. 29 (2): 147–165. doi:10.2307/2715308.
- ^ ..., Gaspar, David Barry. Geggus, David Patrick, 1949- (1997). A turbulent time : the French Revolution and the Greater Caribbean. Indiana University Press. p. 60. ISBN 0253332478. OCLC 468033260.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Díaz, María Elena (2004). "Beyond Tannenbaum". Law and History Review. 22 (2): 371–376. doi:10.2307/4141650.
- ^ 1941-2018,, Berlin, Ira,. Many thousands gone : the first two centuries of slavery in North America. Rogers D. Spotswood Collection. Cambridge, Massachusetts. p. 221. ISBN 0674810929. OCLC 38966102.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)