Lethe's inappropriate behavior violating Wiki rules (v1) edit
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to his list: Apparently Lethe wrote: He was formerly known as "Jack Sarfatt", and changed his surname to "Sarfatti" in 1974. (His earlier publications are written under the name Jack Sarfatt, and later publications under the name Jack Sarfatti.)
The above is false. My real name was "Sarfatti". My father's name is Hyman Sarfatti. My two brother's names are Michael and David Sarfatti. The "i" was omitted by error on my 1939 birth certificate and my father had it CORRECTED in 1974. My real name was RESTORED!
Lethe is in violation of US Federal Law edit
Friendly advice: Back off Lethe and your cronies, Sarfatti really seems to mean it this time. You could wind up in court over this. The issue is your anonymity. If you reveal your true ID you are within the law.
On Mar 26, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to a public list:
"Annoying someone via the Internet is now a federal crime.
It's no joke. Last Thursday, President Bush signed into law a prohibition on posting annoying Web messages or sending annoying e-mail messages without disclosing your true identity.
In other words, it's OK to flame someone on a mailing list or in a blog as long as you do it under your real name."
http://news.com.com/Create+an+e-annoyance,+go+to+jail/2010-1028_3-6022491.html
I am now seriously considering about filing a federal complaint about this anonymous Lethe character who is in obvious violation of the above Federal Law. Would DOJ then demand Wikipedia to reveal Lethe's true identity? This would be an interesting test case of the law like the Google issue. However, if Wiki does remove the offensive slurs, lies and insinuations I will not do so. Lethe and his Gang should be prevented from this kind of harassment of me and others. They are a Gang of Cyber-Terrorists plain and simple. The issue here is Lethe hiding his true ID.
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:48 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Hey Michael and David will you please confirm my real name to these people? Thanks. Some of my political enemies are trying to steal my name from me! Can you believe that? I am also sending this to our cousin Victoria so she can testify.
Lefty Lethe completely spins the facts to make it appear that my real family name was "Sarfatt" which is not true. Do I need to scan in my father's papers to prove this?
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to his list: Apparently Lethe wrote on Wikipedia: He was formerly known as "Jack Sarfatt", and changed his surname to "Sarfatti" in 1974. (His earlier publications are written under the name Jack Sarfatt, and later publications under the name Jack Sarfatti.)
The above is false. My real name was "Sarfatti". My father's name is Hyman Sarfatti. My two brother's names are Michael and David Sarfatti. The "i" was omitted by error on my 1939 birth certificate and my father had it CORRECTED in 1974. My real name was RESTORED! I DID NOT CHANGE MY SURNAME. MY SURNAME WAS RESTORED TO WHAT IT REALLY IS! THAT'S A BIG DIFFERENCE. THIS LETHE IS USING HIS ANONYMITY TO HARASS ME AND IS CAUSING ME PAIN AND SUFFERING.
Lethe's violation of US Federal Law? edit
On Mar 26, 2006, at 5:12 PM, Jack Sarfatti copied to his open list:
Waldyr
Although you removed the insults in your comments you put in another insult in your new introduction that my Islamo-fascist political enemies are citing in the not so thinly disguised anti-Semitic Jew-Hating Wiki hate-crime smear article on me. That's where the fire in the belly of this "Lethe" is coming from. They quote your
"A graduate seminar taught by University of Campinas, Brazil mathematics professor Waldyr Rodrigues which looked for inconsistencies using mathematics jargon in physics recently focused on some of Sarfatti's concepts and methods. In his paper, "A Comment on Emergent Gravity" published in the ArXiv online physics preprint archive, Rodrigues criticized mathematical inconsistencies in the first version of Sarfatti's recent paper, "Emergent Gravity: String Theory Without String Theory". About revised versions of Sarfatti's paper, Rodrigues said "some of the nonsense statements [...] have been removed, new ones have been randomly introduced"."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Sarfatti
These anonymous bastards are out to slander and defame me at every opportunity so please do not give them ammunition. They are completely misusing the intent of your use of "nonsense" to make me look like a charlatan and worse because of my support for Uri Geller and paranormal research and my work on UFOs. Please remove that offensive vague smear sentence. Restrict yourself to specific things you object to which is proper without using incendiary words that my enemies seize on and pull out of context. You are inadvertently helping the Nazis who want to kill all the Jews because my name "Sarfatti" is a "Royal" name in Jewish History. They are even trying to steal my name from me. If this continues I will file a complaint with the US Department of Justice because now anonymous harassment using the Internet is a Federal Crime. Thanks. :-)
Federal Case edit
On Mar 26, 2006, at 8:13 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
Thanks Vicki. I am planning to make a Federal Case of this quite literally if these anonymous Jew-hating slime do not back off. I have had enough of this harassment. It's quite obvious what is behind all this. These guys are really stalking me and looking for every excuse to attack me and hurt me professionally. It's time to counter-attack. Their Achilles Heel is hiding their true ID and using the Internet to "annoy" me. That is a US Federal Offense now and I am glad President Bush signed that into law on Dec 15, 2005. Now we will use that law if we have to. These Cyber-Terrorists are hounding me 24/7.
On Mar 26, 2006, at 6:21 PM, Victoria Sunshine wrote:
I hope your problem gets resolved. I will be happy to help you in any way. I do have my birth certifcate which states that my mother's maiden name was Regina Sarfatti. Just ask if you need help. Received a wonderful letter from your mom. I will respond to her. Loved meeting you. Come back to Laguna Vicki
On Mar 26, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Michael Sarfatti wrote: I can confirm that Jack's true family name is "Sarfatti"
Regards, Mike Sarfatti (his "baby" brother)
Hey Michael and David will you please confirm my real name to these people? Thanks. Some of my political enemies are trying to steal my name from me! Can you believe that? I am also sending this to our cousin Victoria so she can testify.
Lefty Lethe completely spins the facts to make it appear that my real family name was "Sarfatt" which is not true. Do I need to scan in my father's papers to prove this?
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to his list: Apparently Lethe wrote on Wikipedia: He was formerly known as "Jack Sarfatt", and changed his surname to "Sarfatti" in 1974. (His earlier publications are written under the name Jack Sarfatt, and later publications under the name Jack Sarfatti.)
The above is false. My real name was "Sarfatti". My father's name is Hyman Sarfatti. My two brother's names are Michael and David Sarfatti. The "i" was omitted by error on my 1939 birth certificate and my father had it CORRECTED in 1974. My real name was RESTORED! I DID NOT CHANGE MY SURNAME. MY SURNAME WAS RESTORED TO WHAT IT REALLY IS! THAT'S A BIG DIFFERENCE. THIS LETHE IS USING HIS ANONYMITY TO HARASS ME AND IS CAUSING ME PAIN AND SUFFERING.
Lethe's inappropriate behavior violating Wiki rules edit
On Mar 26, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Jack Sarfatti wrote to his list: Apparently Lethe wrote: He was formerly known as "Jack Sarfatt", and changed his surname to "Sarfatti" in 1974. (His earlier publications are written under the name Jack Sarfatt, and later publications under the name Jack Sarfatti.)
The above is false. My real name was "Sarfatti". My father's name is Hyman Sarfatti. My two brother's names are Michael and David Sarfatti. The "i" was omitted by error on my 1939 birth certificate and my father had it CORRECTED in 1974. My real name was RESTORED!
Anonymity of the Character Assassins edit
Lethe, you have no morality, you have no sense of decency and fair play. That Goya painting you put on your talk page shows that you are a sick puppy. Hopefully you do not have bodies buried under your basement? :-) You obviously realize that your academic colleagues would not approve of your unprofessional behavior here. You remind me of Hannibal Lector with that map of your psyche you posted. If you attack a man, you should be prepared for a counter-attack especially when the attack is a vicious smear. What's wrong with you? History is being made here and one day your true identity will be ascertained. You have no right to remain anonymous and assassinate people's characters. If Sarfatti wanted to he could easily use his intelligence connections to find out who you really are. You are not important enough to waste those resources on. You are clearly indicting yourself as a coward. Go ahead and make specific objections against Sarfatti's physics in http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0602022 . You are obviously not able to do so. You are like a sniper hiding on an overpass shooting people driving by. That's the kind of mentality you are displaying Lethe especially with that picture you have posted. You fit the profile of a wannabe serial killer psychopath getting his thrills virtually. Well if that keeps you off the streets then I suppose Sarfatti is willing to be the target of your abuse and of the abuse of the other ciphers who have done the same using anonymity. The point here is that even if you find errors in Sarfatti's work that does not make him into a "crackpot", "crank" and "kook." Everyone makes errors. Sarfatti's clear record is that he instantly acknowledges and corrects errors intelligently pointed out. He has always done so.
Lethe Caught Perverting The Truth edit
PROOF OF SARFATTI WORKING WITH GELLER IS IN A SERIES OF PHOTOGRAPHS FROM LONDON IN 2004 AT http://qedcorp.com/London/ Look for yourself you cowardly little creep.
The Above Saturn Picture edit
Reminds me of this chilling news report "and in Purcell, Oklahoma, a man named Kevin Ray Underwood was arrested for killing a 10-year-old girl named Jamie Rose Bolin. "I chopped her up," he told police. "Regarding a potential motive," said a police chief, "this appears to have been part of a plan to kidnap a person, rape them, torture them, kill them, cut off their head, drain the body of blood, rape the corpse, eat the corpse, then dispose of the organs and bones." The police also announced that they had removed skewers and a meat tenderizer from Underwood's apartment." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.124.31.188 (talk • contribs)
anonymous defense edit
For the record Sarfatti did not write the above. It's much too graphic for Sarfatti's sensibilities. It was someone else who thinks you're a creep. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.47.190 (talk • contribs) .
alias edit
Lethe is an alias for an unknown person who has a penchant for spreading uncorroborated rumors about famous people and violating the Wiki rule against original research. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Janereynolds (talk • contribs) .
No it's not. I hope she's cute. LOL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.121.151.58 (talk • contribs) 03:43, June 13, 2006.
from my talk edit
The Above Saturn Picture edit
- moved weird accusation that I am a child murderer and rapist to User:Lethe/sarfatti. -lethe talk + 03:42, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
THAT WAS NOT SARFATTI! IT WAS SOMEONE ELSE WHO THINKS YOU'RE A CREEP! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.47.190 (talk • contribs) .
- This harassment (or stalking) by whomever bothers me (who am not a victim of it).--CSTAR 03:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
SINCE LETHE IS ANONYMOUS, HE IS THE STALKER HERE. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.47.190 (talk • contribs) .
- I'm just thankful that this stalker (based on previous attacks he's made against me based on that picture, I assume that this is Jack Sarfatti) doesn't know my real identity. I probably wouldn't edit here if I didn't have anonymity to protect me, and this is exactly the reason why.
ANTIGRAY SAYS YOU ARE PROFESSOR SINGER AT A COLLEGE IN NORTH CAROLINA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.47.190 (talk • contribs) .
- Anyway, I really like that painting, and I have a print of it hanging in my kitchen (apparently de Goya originally painted it on his kitchen wall). Yeah, the painting is a bit morbid, but the inference that I'm a murderer or a child rapist seems like a bit of a stretch. I do not appreciate the allegation, though as long as I'm not getting called by the dept chair into his office to defend myself after Sarfatti calls my uni (something he's done to others in the past), I don't care too much. -lethe talk + 04:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
THAT IS A FALSE RUMOR. SARFATTI NEVER DID ANY SUCH THING. WHERE IS YOUR PROOF? IF YOU ARE A PROFESSOR OF MATHEMATICS AT A UNIVERSITY THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE WASTING YOUR TIME ON THIS NONSENSE. YOU SHOULD BE DOING YOUR JOB. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.47.190 (talk • contribs) .
Hey Lethe, sorry about not just deleting it, and moving it here instead. I thought it was just one of those random anon comments. --C S (Talk) 04:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
- That's fine. I've been receiving these for a while, and I have a special place for Sarfatti's attacks, but you couldn't have known that. -lethe talk + 04:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jack Sarfatti and the Bay area pacbell.net anon edit
Hi, Lethe, I've compiled a little list:
IPs possibly used by Jack Sarfatti as the Bay area pacbell.net anon to edit Jack Sarfatti and its talk page include:
- 67.124.118.41 adsl-67-124-118-41.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net San Francisco
- 68.121.150.197 adsl-68-121-150-197.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net San Jose
- 68.122.1.180 adsl-68-122-1-180.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.123.40.112 adsl-68-123-40-112.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.123.140.70 adsl-68-123-140-70.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.123.180.254 adsl-68-123-180-254.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.124.23.153 adsl-68-124-23-153.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.124.78.243 adsl-68-124-78-243.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 68.125.78.83 adsl-68-125-78-83.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 69.104.60.117 adsl-69-104-60-117.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net "
- 71.139.55.87 ppp-71-139-55-87.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net San Francisco
- 71.139.62.252 ppp-71-139-62-252.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net "
- 71.139.113.54 ppp-71-139-113-54.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net "
The pacbell.net domain is registered to SBC Internet Services, Inc.
An anon editor using 71.139.97.67 mentioned "my book Destiny Matrix", which is rather unambiguous. I do know of some Sarfatti associates who have been mentioned by him in the talk page and who live in the Bay area, however.
SHOWS WHAT A NAIVE GUY YOU ARE. OBVIOUSLY THAT WAS PLANTED TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE IT WAS SARFATTI.
HOGWASH, SARFATTI'S ONLY IP IS 68.123.47.190 - NONE OF THE ABOVE ARE FROM SARFATTI. MOST OF SAN FRANCISCO IS pacbell SBC Sarfatti would not be caught dead in San Jose!
Regarding Sarfatti's occasional threats to report us as "terrorists" to the Department of Homeland Security, did you know that another crank, William A. Dembski, said on his blog that he has actually done just this? See Mims-Pianka controversy and Talk:William A. Dembski#Dembski and academic freedom?. I still don't really understand this, but so far as I can tell, Eric Pianka did not call for the extermination of mankind, he warned that unrestrained human population growth and travel patterns would seem to make deadly pandemics a biological inevitability. Nonetheless, it seems that the FBI has actually harrassed him! What a world, hey? ---CH 04:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
HOGWASH, WHAT THREATS? NO SUCH THREATS. YOU MISTOOK SARFATTI QUOTING "ANTIGRAY" AS SARFATTI'S WRITING IS ONLY POSSIBILITY HERE.
- Yeah, I'm sure the anon who made most recent edit to Talk:Jack Sarfatti is Sarfatti himself. I was just having a little fun with him, since he misspelled his name "Sarfatt", the very mistake that was was (falsely) accusing me of enforcing on the page, and threatening to call his buddies in the government to find out my identity and sue me or whatever. Frankly, I think it would be kind of fun to get a visit from the FBI to talk about Jack Sarfatti. I got a visit from the NSA when I was in college when my roommate applied for a security clearance job with them, and that was fun. But I guess not everyone would think it as fun as I might, and obviously I wouldn't like to get sued, even if it were completely frivolous. That sort of thing stultifies free speech, something I guess Dembski counts on. Anyway, here are some more IPs for your collection: 68.124.31.188, 68.125.8.213, 68.124.23.189, 68.123.141.112. These are some of the IPs that have vandalized my userpage with the legal threats. I guess they could all be added to Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of JackSarfatti. -lethe talk + 05:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
You have a strange concept of "vandalism". It's Calton who is the vandal here. Sarfatti never threatened to report you as a terrorist. You are imagining things. On the other hand your use of that horrible picture by Goya sure makes you look like that German cannibal who ate a guy who apparently wanted to be eaten.
"Stultify free speech"? What's wrong with you people? You are denying Sarfatti free speech about himself! You make it appear that he renounced Uri Geller for example. That is not true. In fact Sarfatti and Geller work together as the photo on Sarfatti's page shows. Calton keeps removing factual information about that topic - blatant hypocrisy. Your concept of free speech is your freedom to slander and libel.
You guys think you are above the rule of law. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.123.141.112 (talk • contribs) .
- And what "law" would that be?
FAIRPLAY, DECENCY, RESPECT FOR TRUTH - LET'S START WITH THOSE. BTW, "RULE OF LAW" IS A GENERAL PRINCIPLE AND DOES NOT REFER TO ANY PARTICULAR STATUTE. BUT LET'S STICK TO THE ISSUE - THE FACT ABOUT SARFATTI AND URI GELLER THAT IS MISREPRESENTED.
- Here's a free clue for you, Jack: this site has rules, and you've frequently and unapologetically violated them. For that, you've been banned. Those rules are the ones you think you're above.
HOGWASH! WHAT RULES? YOU ARE NOT THE US CONGRESS - NOT YET. SURE YOU CREEPS WANT TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD BY FIRST TAKING OVER THE WEB. YOU GUYS ARE ALL COMMUNIST TOTALITARIANS. IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS. YOUR RULES ARE "WE TRAMPLE OVER YOUR RIGHTS." YOU FIT THE DESCRIPTIONS IN GEORGE ORWELL'S "ANIMAL FARM."
- Sarfatti never threatened to report you as a terrorist. Not merely a lie, but an obvious and incompetently told one. --Calton | Talk 04:39, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF CALTON? WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU BLOWING HOT AIR ABOUT THIS TIME? LET'S GET SOMETHING STRAIGHT HERE. SARFATTI DOES NOT GIVE A DAMN ABOUT YOU INCONSEQUENTIAL WANNABE CIPHER COMMISARS AND YOUR TRITE PICAYUNE LITTLE POWER GAMES YOU PLAY WITH EACH OTHER ABOUT DOTTING I'S AND CROSSING T'S AND OTHER TRIVIA. SARFATTI'S ONLY INTEREST IS THAT THE THINGS YOU MORONS WRITE ABOUT HIM ARE TRUTHFUL AND IN PROPER CONTEXT AND BALANCE.
For example who is Calton? He is a nobody. He has an inconsequential job in Japan. He can't even get a job in USA. He has no expertise in any of the fields Sarfatti is concerned with. Who is Lethe? He may be a professor Singer at a third rate college in North Carolina. He is no physicist. He has no great original mathematical theorems to his name. Hopefully he is a competent teacher although he spends so much time on Wiki that is questionable.
one for Oleg edit
Go back to the Gulag with the other Commisars why don't you?