Welcome

edit

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed you recently made some edits to Example that could be considered controversial.

It is generally a good idea to propose and discuss potentially controversial changes on the talk page of the article, and establish community consensus before making them.

I have not reverted your edits, but others may do so if they think they are inappropriate, since you didn't establish consensus before making them. Please remember to avoid an edit war (that's repeatedly changing the page back to how you think it should be) – instead, discuss civilly on the talk page to reach consensus. If that fails, you can seek dispute resolution.

By the way, you may find the Introduction or the primer for newcomers useful for learning about contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank you. (signature)

Welcome

edit

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.

I noticed you recently made some edits to Example that could be considered controversial.

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a place for your own analysis or commentary and that Wikipedia articles must be neutral and represent all major viewpoints.

I have not reverted your edits, but others may do so, since they may violate Wikipedia's policies. Please remember to avoid an edit war (that's repeatedly changing the page back to how you think it should be) – instead, discuss civilly on the talk page to reach consensus. If that fails, you can seek dispute resolution.

By the way, you may find the Introduction or the primer for newcomers useful for learning about contributing to Wikipedia.

Thank you. (signature)

Regarding inline citations

edit

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

It would be appreciated if you could use inline citations to reliable sources when adding information to Wikipedia.

By the way, you may find the introduction to policies and guidelines useful.

Thank you. (signature)

edit

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

An image should not be hotlinked, but instead:

Thank you. (signature)

Test

edit

{{subst:User:LauritzT/t/pingme}}

Voluptas officia repudiandae ad laboriosam vel eaque soluta reiciendis. Repellat vel suscipit et enim nulla occaecati. Vel omnis qui suscipit quia porro quia id repellendus. Delectus ipsum nisi sint facere. Harum nemo quos in eveniet. Et quod temporibus consectetur et rem incidunt non fuga.

— Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

P.S.: If you reply here, please use the {{Reply to|LauritzT}} template to notify me (and remember to sign your reply with ~~~~).

Possimus sit fugiat harum. Natus aut hic tempore dolorem beatae porro. At qui non unde consequatur aspernatur quia. Aliquam consequuntur ut labore fugiat. Est magnam animi labore. Quia velit porro sed aut. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@LauritzT: Lorem ipsum.

Voluptas officia repudiandae ad laboriosam vel eaque soluta reiciendis — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Voluptas officia repudiandae ad laboriosam vel eaque soluta reiciendis — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


Signatures

edit
— LauritzT (talk)
— LauritzT (talk · notify)
— {{re|LauritzT}} (talk)
— {{re|LauritzT}} (talk)
— {{re|LauritzT}} (talk)


Maybe a preload like [1] can be used with a notify link?



Time

edit

07:00


Electronvolt

edit

Before

edit

The energy E, frequency v, and wavelength λ of a photon are related by

 

where h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light. This reduces to[1]   A photon with a wavelength of 532 nm (green light) would have an energy of approximately 2.33 eV. Similarly, 1 eV would correspond to an infrared photon of wavelength 1240 nm or frequency 241.8 THz.

After

edit

The energy E, frequency v, and wavelength λ of a photon are related by

 

where h is the Planck constant, c is the speed of light. This reduces to[1]   A photon with a wavelength of 532 nm (green light) would have an energy of approximately 2.33 eV. Similarly, 1 eV would correspond to an infrared photon of wavelength 1240 nm or frequency 241.8 THz.

  1. ^ a b "CODATA Value: Planck constant in eV s". Archived from the original on 22 January 2015. Retrieved 30 March 2015.