The very first thing that I noticed was that Boron is talked about a disproportionately large amount compared to the other micronutrients. Also, considering the vast amount of information that "Plant Nutrition" should cover, it only has 34 sources, some of which are overused or questionably old. One could argue that the sources are biased, in that they mostly come from facilities that also grow plants for other purposes, although I would say that the information seems relatively unbiased, aside from the love of boron. However, a lot of the sources are not links, making it hard to check them for the facts that are claiming to have come from them. Overall, more information from good sources needs to be added to this article.
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Florida/HOS3430C_Nutrition_of_Horticultural_Crops_(Spring_2017). Student assignments should always be carried out using a course page set up by the instructor. It is usually best to develop assignments in your sandbox. After evaluation, the additions may go on to become a Wikipedia article or be published in an existing article. |