Advice edit
The article still need some third party sources. The associaten web site can be used for descrition, but to show its notable requires references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. It also needs to be rewritten in a tone less similar to a press release: a press release is written in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an encyclopedia article will be written in terms of what the public might wish to know. Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective members/supporters/donors--that sort of content is considered promotional. (The successive presidents would not be considered promotional here, but we ordinarily do not include vice-presidents. Please remove links to all social media except its main web site.
Our practices at enWP about sourcing and promotionalism are different and somewhat more specific than the deWP. I advise you to fix the problem, and do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. DGG ( talk ) 12:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)