Dimensional Models of Emotion

edit

Dimensional models of emotion attempt to conceptualize human emotions by defining where they lie in two or three dimensions. Almost all dimensional models incorporate valence and arousal or intensity dimensions. Dimensional models of emotion suggest that a common and interconnected neurophysiological system is responsible for all affective states.[1] These models contrast theories of basic emotion, which propose that different emotions arise from separate neural systems.[1] Several dimensional models of emotion have been developed, though there are just a few that remain as the dominant models currently accepted by most. [2] The two-dimensional models that are most prominent are the circumplex model, the vector model, and the Positive Activation – Negative Activation (PANA) model.[2]

Circumplex model

edit

The circumplex model of emotion was first developed by James Russell.[3] This model suggests that emotions are distributed in a two-dimensional circular space, containing arousal and valence dimensions. Arousal represents the vertical axis and valence represents the horizontal axis, while the center of the circle represents a neutral valence and a medium level of arousal.[2] In this model, emotional states can be represented at any level of valence and arousal, or at a neutral level of one or both of these factors. Circumplex models have been used most commonly to test stimuli of emotion words, emotional facial expressions, and affective states.[4]

Russell and Lisa Feldman Barrett describe their modified circumplex model as representative of core affect, or the most elementary feelings that are not necessarily directed toward anything. Different prototypical emotional episodes, or clear emotions that are evoked or directed by specific objects, can be plotted on the circumplex, according to their levels of arousal and pleasure.[5]

Vector model

edit

The vector model of emotion first appeared in 1992.[6] This two-dimensional model consists of vectors that point in two directions, representing a "boomerang" shape. The model assumes that there is always an underlying arousal dimension, and that valence determines the direction in which a particular emotion lies. For example, a positive valence would shift the emotion up the top vector and a negative valence would shift the emotion down the bottom vector.[2] In this model, high arousal states are differentiated by their valence, whereas low arousal states are more neutral and are represented near the meeting point of the vectors. Vector models have been most widely used in the testing of word and picture stimuli.[4]

Positive activation – negative activation (PANA) model

edit

The positive activation – negative activation (PANA) or "consensual" model of emotion, originally created by Watson and Tellegan in 1985,[7] suggests that positive affect and negative affect are two separate systems. Similar to the vector model, states of higher arousal tend to be defined by their valence, and states of lower arousal tend to be more neutral in terms of valence.[2] In the PANA model, the vertical axis represents low to high positive affect and the horizontal axis represents low to high negative affect. The dimensions of valence and arousal lay at a 45-degree rotation over these axes.[7]

There are also several models of emotion that propose three or more dimensions.

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Posner, Jonathan (2005). "The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology". Developmental and Psychopathology. 17 (3): 715–734. doi:10.1017/S0954579405050340. PMC 2367156. PMID 16262989. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  2. ^ a b c d e Rubin, D. C. (2009). "A comparison of dimensional models of emotion". Memory. 17 (8): 802–808. doi:10.1080/09658210903130764. PMC 2784275. PMID 19691001. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  3. ^ Russell, James (1980). "A circumplex model of affect". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39 (6): 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714.
  4. ^ a b Remington, N. A. (2000). "Re-examining the circumplex model of affect". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79 (2): 286–300. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.286. PMID 10948981. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Russell, James (1999). "Core affect, prototypical emotional episodes, and other things called emotion: dissecting the elephant". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 76 (5): 805–819. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.805. PMID 10353204. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ Bradley, M. M. (1992). "Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 18 (2): 379–390. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.2.379. PMID 1532823. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ a b Watson, D. (1985). "Toward a consensual structure of mood". Psychological Bulletin. 98 (2): 219–235. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.219. PMID 3901060. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)