User:Jts1882/sandbox/test/Archosaurs

The following cladograms were copied from Wikipedia mainspace articles and used to test the Lua module version of the {{clade}} using the test template {{cladeN}}.

Archosaurs and relatives edit

Archosauromorpha#Relationships edit

The cladogram shown below follows the most likely result found by an analysis of turtle relationships using both fossil and genetic evidence by M.S. Lee, in 2013.[1]

Sauria

Lepidosauromorpha 


 Archosauromorpha (=Archelosauria


Choristodera 


Crocopoda


Trilophosaurus 



Rhynchosauria 




Archosauriformes 




 Pantestudines 

Eosauropterygia 




Placodontia 




Sinosaurosphargis




Odontochelys


 Testudinata 

Proganochelys



Testudines 









The following cladogram is based on a large analysis of archosauriforms published by M.D. Ezcurra in 2016.[2]

Sauria

Choristodera 



Lepidosauromorpha 


 Archosauromorpha 


Aenigmastropheus




Protorosaurus




Tanystropheidae


 Crocopoda 
Allokotosauria

Pamelaria




Azendohsaurus



Trilophosaurus 






Rhynchosauria 




Boreopricea




Prolacertidae




Tasmaniosaurus



Archosauriformes 













Archosauriformes#Relationships edit

Below is a cladogram from Nesbitt (2011):[3]

Archosauriformes 
 Proterosuchidae 

Archosaurus



Proterosuchus 





Erythrosuchus 




Vancleavea



 Proterochampsia 

Tropidosuchus



Chanaresuchus 





Euparkeria 


 Crurotarsi 
 Phytosauria

Parasuchus




Smilosuchus 



Pseudopalatus




 Archosauria 

Pseudosuchia 



Avemetatarsalia 








*Note: Phytosaurs were previously placed within Pseudosuchia, or crocodile-line archosaurs.

Below is a cladogram from Ezcurra (2016), that reexamined all historical members of the "Proterosuchia" (a polyphyletic historical group including proterosuchids and erythrosuchids). The placement of fragmentary taxa that had to be removed to increase tree resolution are indicated by dashed lines (in the most derived position that they can be confidently assigned to). Taxa that are nomina dubia are indicated by the note "dubium". Bold terminal taxa are collapsed.[2]

 Crocopoda 

Allokotosauria 




Rhynchosauria 




Boreopricea funerea




Prolacertidae




SAM-PK-591



"Ankistrodon indicus" (dubium)



"Blomosuchus georgii" (dubium)



Tasmaniosaurus triassicus


 Archosauriformes 
 Chasmatosuchus 

Chasmatosuchus magnus



Chasmatosuchus rossicus



Gamosaurus lozovskii




Chasmatosuchus vjushkovi



Vonhuenia friedrichi



Proterosuchidae 




Eorasaurus olsoni



Kalisuchus rewanensis



Fugusuchus hejiapanensis




Sarmatosuchus otschevi




Cuyosuchus huenei




Erythrosuchidae 


 Eucrocopoda 

Asperoris mnyama



Dorosuchus neoetus




Euparkeria capensis 




Dongusuchus efremovi



Yarasuchus deccanensis




 Proterochampsia 

Doswelliidae 



Proterochampsidae 



 Archosauria 

Avemetatarsalia 


 Pseudosuchia 

Phytosauria 



The rest of Pseudosuchia 

















Allokotosauria edit

Below is a cladogram showing the phylogenetic relationships of Allokotosauria within Archosauromorpha as recovered by Nesbitt et al. (2015).[4] Ezcurra (2016) also recovered a highly supported Allokotosauria with the same topology (including only Pamelaria, Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis and Trilophosaurus buettneri in his analysis), but noted that Pamelaria is nearly as likely to represent a basal azendohsaurid instead.[2]

 Sauria 

Lepidosauromorpha


 Archosauromorpha 

Protorosaurus speneri



 Tanystropheidae 

Macrocnemus bassanii





Langobardisaurus pandolfii



Tanytrachelos ahynis





Amotosaurus rotfeldensis



Tanystropheus longobardicus





 Crocopoda sensu Ezcurra (2016)[2] 
 Rhynchosauria 

Mesosuchus browni




Rhynchosaurus articeps



Teyumbaita sulcognathus







Archosauriformes



Prolacerta broomi



 Allokotosauria 

Pamelaria dolichotrachela



 Azendohsauridae 

Azendohsaurus laaroussii



Azendohsaurus madagaskarensis



 Trilophosauridae 

Teraterpeton hrynewichorum




Trilophosaurus buettneri


 Spinosuchus caseanus 

"Trilophosaurus" jacobsi



Spinosuchus caseanus holotype












Suchia#Phylogeny edit

Below is a phylogenetic cladogram by Butler et al. in 2011 showing the cladistics of Archosauriformes, focusing mostly on Pseudosuchia:[5] Clade names follow Nesbitt 2011.[6]


Mesosuchus




Prolacerta


Archosauriformes

Proterosuchus




Erythrosuchus




Vancleavea



Proterochampsia

Tropidosuchus



Chanaresuchus





Euparkeria



Phytosauria

Parasuchus




Smilosuchus



Pseudopalatus




Archosauria
Pseudosuchia
Ornithosuchidae

Riojasuchus



Ornithosuchus



Suchia

Gracilisuchus



Turfanosuchus




Revueltosaurus


Aetosauria

Aetosaurus




Stagonolepis



Longosuchus







Ticinosuchus


Paracrocodylomorpha
Poposauroidea

Qianosuchus



Ctenosauriscidae

Arizonasaurus



Xilousuchus



Hypselorhachis



Ctenosauriscus



Waldhaus Taxon






Poposaurus gracilis H



Poposaurus gracilis Y





Lotosaurus


Shuvosauridae

Sillosuchus




Shuvosaurus



Effigia








Loricata

Prestosuchus




Saurosuchus




Batrachotomus




Fasolasuchus



Rauisuchidae

Rauisuchus




Polonosuchus silesiacus



Postosuchus alisonae



Postosuchus kirkpatricki




Crocodylomorpha

CM 73372




Hesperosuchus agilis



Hesperosuchus "agilis"



Dromicosuchus



Alligator














Avemetatarsalia










Avemetatarsalia#Phylogeny edit

Cladogram after Nesbitt (2011):

Avemetatarsalia 
Ornithodira 

†Pterosauromorpha (=Pterosauria)  


 Dinosauromorpha 

Lagerpetonidae


 Dinosauriformes 

Marasuchus 




Silesauridae 


 Dinosauria 

Ornithischia  


 Saurischia 

Theropoda  



Sauropodomorpha  









References edit

  1. ^ Lee, M. S. Y. (2013). "Turtle origins: Insights from phylogenetic retrofitting and molecular scaffolds". Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 26 (12): 2729–38. doi:10.1111/jeb.12268. PMID 24256520.
  2. ^ a b c d Ezcurra MD. (2016) The phylogenetic relationships of basal archosauromorphs, with an emphasis on the systematics of proterosuchian archosauriforms. PeerJ, 4:e1778 [1] Cite error: The named reference "ezcurra2016" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  3. ^ Nesbitt, S.J. (2011). "The early evolution of archosaurs: relationships and the origin of major clades" (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 352: 1–292. doi:10.1206/352.1.
  4. ^ Cite error: The named reference nesbitt2015 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Butler, R.J.; Brusatte, S.J.; Reich, M.; Nesbitt, S.J.; Schoch, R.R.; Hornung, J.J. (2011). Andrew A. Farke (ed.). "The Sail-Backed Reptile Ctenosauriscus from the Latest Early Triassic of Germany and the Timing and Biogeography of the Early Archosaur Radiation". PLoS ONE. 6 (10): e25693. Bibcode:2011PLoSO...625693B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025693. PMC 3194824. PMID 22022431.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  6. ^ Nesbitt, S.J. (2011). "The Early Evolution of Archosaurs: Relationships and the Origin of Major Clades". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 352: 189. doi:10.1206/352.1. ISSN 0003-0090.