In the middle we have the front runner for me. Modified from the original. No value slot (I feel value line is redundant with Dollar coin heading one line above), with production years, alloys abreviated. In center; min mods, number in circulation (bottom) I don't care to much about, but it is a nice fact. The one on the far left is the original.
Dollar coin | |
Value: | 1 U.S. dollar |
Mass: | 8.100 g |
Diameter: | 26.5 mm |
Thickness: | 2.00 mm |
Edge: | Plain |
Composition: | 88.5% copper 6% zinc 3.5% manganese 2% nickel |
Obverse | |
180px|Obverse of a United States dollar coin | |
Design: | Sacagawea with child |
Designer: | Glenna Goodacre |
Design Date: | 2000 |
Reverse | |
![]() | |
Design: | Eagle in flight |
Designer: | Thomas D. Rogers |
Design Date: | 2000 |
Dollar coin | |
Production Years: | 2000?-Current |
Mass: | 8.100 g |
Diameter: | 26.5 mm |
Thickness: | 2.00 mm |
Edge: | Plain |
Composition: | 88.5% Cu 6% Zn 3.5% Mn 2% Ni |
Obverse | |
![]() | |
Design: | Sacagawea with child |
Designer: | Glenna Goodacre |
Design Date: | 2000 |
Reverse | |
![]() | |
Design: | Eagle in flight |
Designer: | Thomas D. Rogers |
Design Date: | 2000 |
Dollar coin | |
Face Value: | 1 U.S. dollar |
Mass: | 8.100 g |
Diameter: | 26.5 mm |
Thickness: | 2.00 mm |
Edge: | Plain |
Composition: | 88.5% copper 6% zinc 3.5% manganese 2% nickel |
Obverse | |
![]() | |
Design: | Sacagawea with child |
Designer: | Glenna Goodacre |
Design Date: | 2000 |
Reverse | |
![]() | |
Design: | Eagle in flight |
Designer: | Thomas D. Rogers |
Design Date: | 2000 |
?Number in Circulation? | To Many |
Main articles, ones that have more than one major mintin design, shouldn't have this table, such as United States dollar coin. It should be reserved for more specific articles such as Sacagawea dollar. Just my two cents (hehe I love links). Lemme know what your thoughts are. The tables caught my eye last night, so I figured I'd do something. Joe I 20:56, 12 October 2005 (UTC)