- It'd be good to see some more non-geocites refs in the article, wherever possible...
- As unfortunate as that is, the geocities links are largely (if not exclusively) due to the articles being hosted at the comprehensive archive website "TISM Self Storage" the content itself is invaluable even if it is hosted at an oft-looked-down-upon host.
- OK - might wanna make note of this at the start of the references section (see Internationalist (album) for an example). — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Had a look through and only six references are hosted at geocities. Hardly worth making a point about, is it?
- Yeah, OK, that's fine. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- Had a look through and only six references are hosted at geocities. Hardly worth making a point about, is it?
- OK - might wanna make note of this at the start of the references section (see Internationalist (album) for an example). — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- Last paragraph of Style section needs a non-TISM, non-geocities ref.
- Yes, it does. Good point.
- Or indeed, any ref.
- Most of the external links are not relevant as external links - they can be used as references instead. Only the first (official site) and last (MusicBrainz, provided it's a full discog) should be kept there. A MySpace link (for TISM, not ROOT!) could go there too.
- *waits for response* — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- comment
about the "members" section being moved down, how do you feel about it going like this:
- Intro
1. History
- 1.1 Early years
- 1.2 Rise to fame
- 1.3 After Shock Records
- 1.4 Current status
2. Members
- 2.1 Identities
3. Style
4. Discography
5. References
6. External links
- I've got no problems with that, but the current layout (members after style) is better in my opinion. — Dihydrogen Monoxide 22:04, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- I just think the style is a lesser section than the identities section. I don't know quite why. And as the sections were moved at the start of this process it seemed odd to have two different sections in two different locations with such similar titles "members" and "identities" -Gohst (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
- *concurs* — Dihydrogen Monoxide 03:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
- I just think the style is a lesser section than the identities section. I don't know quite why. And as the sections were moved at the start of this process it seemed odd to have two different sections in two different locations with such similar titles "members" and "identities" -Gohst (talk) 23:15, 9 December 2007 (UTC)