User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Guantanamo captive's habeas corpus cases/Re Guantanamo Detainee Litigation Docs/Doc 907
 | This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's rough notes page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. |
See User:Geo Swan/Stale drafts#Scaffolding
- REPLY to opposition to motion re (628 in 1:05-cv-02386-RBW, 88 in 1:05-cv-00999-RBW, 84 in 1:05-cv-01983-RMU, 391 in 1:02-cv-00828-CKK, 135 in 1:05-cv-00023-RWR, 28 in 1:08-cv-01236-JDB, 80 in 1:05-cv-00892-CKK, 26 in 1:08-cv-01233-ESH, 198 in 1:04-cv-02022-PLF, 70 in 1:05-cv-00889-ESH, 723 in 1:08-mc-00442-TFH, 82 in 1:05-cv-02104-RBW, 27 in 1:08-cv-01230-RMC, 26 in 1:08-cv-01231-CKK, 108 in 1:05-cv-00247-HHK, 110 in 1:05-cv-01490-PLF) MOTION to Dismiss Improper Respondents filed by GEORGE W. BUSH, JR, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD, GEORGE W. BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD, NELSON J. CANNON, NELSON J. CANNON, DONALD RUMSFELD, DONALD RUMSFELD, BRICE GYURISKO, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, BRICE GYURISKO, BRICE GYURISKO, JAY HOOD, JAY HOOD, MICHAEL I. BUMGARNER, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, GEORGE W. BUSH, DONALD RUMSFELD, JAY HOOD, MIKE BUMGARNER, MIKE BUMGARNER, ROBERT M. GATES, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR, BRUCE VARGO, DAVID M. THOMAS, JR, BRUCE VARGO, BRUCE VARGO, DAVID VARGO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE W. BUSH, DONALD H. RUMSFELD, RICHARD B. MYERS, RICK BACCUS, TERRY CARRICO. (Mason, Kathryn)[1]
- On 31 October 2008 DoJ official Kathryn C. Mason filed a "RESPONDENTS’ REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS IMPROPER RESPONDENTS" in Civil Action No. 02-cv-0828, 04-cv-02022, 05-cv-0023, 05-cv-0999, 05-cv-2386, 05-cv-2104, 05-cv-1983, 05-cv-0892, 05-cv-0889, 05-cv-0247, 05-cv-1490, 08-cv-1231, 08-cv-1230, 08-cv-1233, 08-cv-1236 (x).[2]
- On 31 October 2008 DoJ official Kathryn C. Mason filed a reply memorandum to the DoJ's motion to dismiss improper respondents.[2] Mason wrote:
Petitioner Paracha (No. 04-cv-2022) argues that Respondents have waived any objections to the naming of the respondents in his petition, because Respondents did not challenge service of process or this Court’s jurisdiction over the named respondents via a Rule 12(b) motion. Paracha Opp., 08-mc-442 Dkt#790, p. 4. However, Petitioner’s argument is misplaced. Respondents are not challenging in this motion service of process or personal jurisdiction with respect to these improper respondents. Rather, the basis of Respondents’ motion is a challenge to the propriety of naming these respondents in Petitioners’ habeas claim. This challenge is not waived pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. Proc. 12(h)(1), as Petitioner contends, even if that Rule applied here,13 and can be brought at this time.
- ^ "IN RE: GUANTANAMO BAY DETAINEE LITIGATION". United States Department of Justice. 2008-07-02. Retrieved 2008-09-28.
- ^ a b Kathryn C. Mason (2008-10-31). "Guantanamo Bay Detainee Litigation: Doc 907 -- RESPONDENTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS IMPROPER RESPONDENTS" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. Retrieved 2008-12-30.