User:Gadzooksopposite/Nectanebo II/Tmitfc Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Gadzooksopposite
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Gadzooksopposite/Nectanebo II
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Nectanebo II
Evaluate the drafted changes
editThe Leading section:
I think in the leading section, it give the ancient text about Nectanebo II that current version did not have. And about the Saqqara's part, it also give a very clear information that more than the current version. I think that in the Saqqara's part, it might need more information about how Napoleon's French's research about Saqqara.
Clarity of Article Structure:
In Clarity of Article Structure, I think both Nectanebo II and Saqqara's part, it showing a very clear chronicle that at least I can understand. Only need to write more information.
Coverage Balance:
In Coverage Balance, I think that both Nectanebo II and Saqqara's parts are showing enough information about the brief of life of Nectanebo II, and how the finding of the Saqqara. I think there are clear information about both Nectanebo II's brief and Saqqara's information.
Content Neutrality:
In Content Neutrality, it in a very Neutral way to tell us about the brief of Nectanebo II, and also give enough neutrality information about Saqqara. So in that way, I don't think there are any problems about the Content Neutrality problem.
Sources:
In Sources, it give us 8 information that came from the different author, and these information support the Neutrality of the Content. Just of the ancient text about Nectanebo II, I want to know where is the sources of these text.