User:Francis E Williams/Sandbox

There is life beyond Wiki - this "environment" is a collection of bits, "0s" and "1s", arranged in sequence as "nibbles" and "bytes" to form "words", interpreted and compiled into code, code which is stored in a retrieval system. Code that may be accessed here and re-ordered to produce (via a suitable user interface) both audio and visual presentations ONLY. It will not harm you, it will not sustain life in you, it will however, give you headaches when you try to understand it, eye strain when you do too much of it. If you lose your "bits" of "code" it`s because you forgot to hit the "SAVE" button. If you lose "your" sanity - don`t look for it here ! So, what do you think, is this the most important REM of all?, don`t stop drinking, don`t stop eating, and don`t forget to SWITCH OFF occasionally - (both you, and the machine) !

Spamming and COI by Wyrdlight

Dear Bob - I see from your talk page that you are being over officious in exercising your new status. The wiki rules about web site links are not as black and white as you suggest and your actions are likely to be detrimental to the concept and founding principles. A mere statement from you "to stop" as you take a zealots view is not acceptable. Perhaps you could describe the process by which your actions can be reviewed by an appropriate peer group. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:12, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Hi Bob - I see you are now victimising me and my contributions in a particularly unpleasant manner. What do you intend to do about the images I have contributed? For example those on the page you have just vandalised? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:14, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Hello Bob - I see your extremely unpleasant victimisation continues without proper recourse to the wiki foundation principles. You are destroying arbitrarily a great deal of work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:17, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

What is unpleasant or harassing about removing spam? You have contributed some good images to Wikpedia and you should be congratulated for that. Unfortunately you have also spammed your own website across many articles and that is clear conflict of interest, something that you have been warned about before. I'm just sorting out what should have been done a long time ago. That's not vandalism it's good housekeeping. --Simple Bob (talk) 20:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Actually Bob - there isn't a self-interest and I've worked through this previously with other reviewers its just that you are taking a particularly fascist view and dealing with stuff to the detriment of wiki. As previously requested - what is your position on images that require attribution because everyone of those is a form of self-promotion and many wiki contributors have benefited by having their media used in other sectors of the media. Perhaps you can explain the difference - although I rather think you wont be able to! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:23, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

I do not appreciate being called a fascist, I find that highly offensive. --Simple Bob (talk) 20:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Ho Bob - I've just looked at some of the pages you've meddled with and see that your actions are indeed totally arbitrary as you don't seem to be removing links to other web sites that are within your bracket of self-promotion. Well cmon Bob whats the rationale? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:26, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Well up yours as well - you seem to have an extraordinarily hypocritical approach placing that image on your page and then acting as though my contributions are spam. Is that image intended as a comment to me - hardly a christian sentiment or appropriate. You should have that reviewer status removed as you clearly are unable to exercise that authority judiciously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Bob - you've removed a link from a page that I created and developed. Is that appropriate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:32, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Read WP:OWN. --Simple Bob (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Bob - you've removed a link from the Air Forces Memorial. Without any charge of any kind and in an act of christian charity I send images of the inscriptions at the memorial to people in Australia, Canada etc etc - is that the self promotion that you believe you are dealing with? Is that the kind of spamming you reckon you are obviating? Waht is your definition of self-interest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Hey Bob - you've just removed a link to a page which is regarded by INTUTE as an educational resource - how does that stack up as spam and self-interest. Do you believe it helpful to wiki to remove all links to materials that are considered educational? As I said Bob you shouldn't be given authority you can't handle and exercise without thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:41, 4 December 2010 (UTC) Bob - well that's another educational resource page link you've removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wyrdlight (talk • contribs) 20:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Fascism

Bob - when I used this term to describe your behaviour I wasn't being insulting but merely factual - if you look it up on wiki you'll see: "Fascism (pronounced /ˈfæʃɪzəm/) is a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology.Fascists seek to organize a nation according to corporatist perspectives, values, and systems, including the political system and the economy." I'm merely saying you are taking an authoritarian and corporatist view of your role. Please would you remove that rather rude and unpleasant "up yours" image from your page. It really is not consistent with any of the values espoused by wiki.

Terriers

Hi Simple Bob. Please forgive my newness to Wikipedia. I added the reference because I found JaneDogs a fabulous site (do you agree?) written by an internationally recognized terrier expert. (Also, I've noticed lots of other Wikipedia pages pleading for references and thought this was the right thing to do.) Perhaps if I added some more detail e.g. how the regions influence the characteristics of each Terrier breed) along with the reference, that this would pass your (diligent!) review? Your guidance much appreciated (and again, apologies for not understanding the etiquette of Wikipedia). Thanks...MW Mummy-whale (talk) 05:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

It is a poor website with very little content. It seems mostly like a website for promotion of the author's work and DVDs. You added it as a reference for the statement "Most terrier breeds were developed in Great Britain and Ireland", but the site doesn't have any terrier breeds for Ireland. Its breed sections are some of the lightest-weight in terms of content that I have ever seen. The retrievers section, for example, is barely one paragraph and only mentions two breeds. Hardly a reliable source (WP:RS). --Simple Bob (talk) 07:44, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello Bob, Could I make a cooment that this is a rare case of the tail shaking the dog?Francis E Williams (talk) 12:12, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

:) --Simple Bob (talk) 14:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

pad

1. (cur | prev) 19:59, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,235 bytes) (Undid revision 409612009 by Francis E Williams (talk) - deleting unsourced info and making MoS changes IS NOT vandalism) (undo)
2. (cur | prev) 19:56, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (48,309 bytes) (reversion to version as of 19:50, 22 December 2010 86.28.150.157 (talk) - identified as edit war vandalism to Somerset Project article by Users Simple Bob (talk | contribs)Mhockey (talk | contribs)) (undo)
3. (cur | prev) 19:42, 23 January 2011 Mhockey (talk | contribs) (47,235 bytes) (→Modern Road transport issues: retitle (not "modern"), lower case, add re car sharing from public transport section) (undo)
4. (cur | prev) 19:37, 23 January 2011 Mhockey (talk | contribs) (47,021 bytes) (→Public Transport today in 2010: Car sharing is not public transport; Dial a Ride is a bus service) (undo)
5. (cur | prev) 17:30, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,241 bytes) (→Rail services in the region: crop) (undo)
6. (cur | prev) 17:29, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,255 bytes) (→Future needs and current Transport strategy: remove unnecessary section heading - only one subsection of higher level heading) (undo)
7. (cur | prev) 17:29, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,277 bytes) (→Buses, Community services and Car sharing: lower case) (undo)
8. (cur | prev) 17:28, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (47,277 bytes) (→Future needs and current strategy) (undo)
9. (cur | prev) 17:27, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,267 bytes) (→The revival of the railways: MoS tweak) (undo)
10. (cur | prev) 17:27, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,279 bytes) (→Modern transport issues) (undo)
11. (cur | prev) 17:27, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,274 bytes) (→Footpaths, Bridleways and cycle routes: lower case) (undo)
12. (cur | prev) 17:26, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,274 bytes) (→Aircraft and Helicopters: lower case) (undo)
13. (cur | prev) 17:26, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,288 bytes) (→Public Transport today) (undo)
14. (cur | prev) 17:25, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,280 bytes) (→Ferries and River services: did some research. whole thing is pure vapour. removing - feel free to reinstate with suitable reliable references) (undo)
15. (cur | prev) 17:25, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,740 bytes) (→Footpaths and cycle routes) (undo)
16. (cur | prev) 17:24, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,728 bytes) (→Air) (undo)
17. (cur | prev) 17:23, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,706 bytes) (→Ferries) (undo)
18. (cur | prev) 17:22, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (47,687 bytes) (→Rail) (undo)
19. (cur | prev) 17:22, 23 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (47,663 bytes) (→Ferries: No ferries operate in Somerset. Very sceptical of Fastcat ferry. Remove misleading image until ferry becomes reality.) (undo)
20. (cur | prev) 17:21, 23 January 2011 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (48,322 bytes) (→Buses: it was road systems but somebody wants to call it buses - read it through first please before editing) (undo)
21. (cur | prev) 17:05, 23 January 2011 Mhockey (talk | contribs) (48,286 bytes) (→Public Transport in the 21st Century: reorder, retitle sections) (undo)
22. (cur | prev) 19:50, 22 December 2010 86.28.150.157 (talk) (48,283 bytes) (→Modern transport issues: de-bracketisation) (undo)

pad

1. (cur | prev) 14:06, 18 January 2011 Rodw (talk | contribs) m (8,671 bytes) (destub) (undo)
2. (cur | prev) 14:05, 18 January 2011 Rodw (talk | contribs) (8,698 bytes) (add pic) (undo)
3. (cur | prev) 17:51, 17 January 2011 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (8,669 bytes) (→Present day: performance) (undo)
4. (cur | prev) 18:49, 21 December 2010 Cydebot (talk | contribs) m (7,822 bytes) (Robot - Moving category Schools in Bath to Schools in Bath, Somerset per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 December 13.) (undo)
5. (cur | prev) 13:19, 15 December 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,812 bytes) (→Present day: scrutiniy decision) (undo)
6. (cur | prev) 19:53, 1 December 2010 Half price (talk | contribs) m (7,480 bytes) (Reverted edits by 86.154.5.250 to last version by Simple Bob (GLOO)) (undo)
7. (cur | prev) 19:52, 1 December 2010 86.154.5.250 (talk) (7,427 bytes) (→See also) (undo)
8. (cur | prev) 00:48, 30 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,480 bytes) (Undid revision 399574611 by 86.154.5.250 (talk) that is not factual) (undo)
9. (cur | prev) 20:17, 29 November 2010 86.154.5.250 (talk) (7,516 bytes) (→Present day) (undo)
10. (cur | prev) 12:17, 26 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,480 bytes) (Add see-also section) (undo)
11. (cur | prev) 12:15, 26 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,380 bytes) (→Present day: copyedit) (undo)
12. (cur | prev) 12:14, 26 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,399 bytes) (closure decision) (undo)
13. (cur | prev) 03:00, 22 November 2010 LilHelpa (talk | contribs) m (7,454 bytes) (General fixes and Typo fixing, typos fixed: sufficent → sufficient using AWB) (undo)
14. (cur | prev) 15:07, 19 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (7,451 bytes) (→Present day: evening classes) (undo)
15. (cur | prev) 14:07, 19 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (7,238 bytes) (→History: remove 2008-information from school website cannot be verified in any official listings) (undo)
16. (cur | prev) 13:11, 19 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,406 bytes) (→Present day: spelling.) (undo)
17. (cur | prev) 13:09, 19 November 2010 Gensanders (talk | contribs) m (7,413 bytes) (Correcting spelling: sevice->service) (undo)
18. (cur | prev) 13:06, 19 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,412 bytes) (→Present day: tweak again) (undo)
19. (cur | prev) 13:04, 19 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (7,402 bytes) (→Present day: move ref back to text. tweak award) (undo)
20. (cur | prev) 12:58, 19 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (7,376 bytes) (→Present day: radio station award) (undo)
21. (cur | prev) 12:45, 19 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (7,129 bytes) (Radio station lottery funding reinstated into article) (undo)
22. (cur | prev) 22:26, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,807 bytes) (→Present day: remove a little peacock language) (undo)
23. (cur | prev) 22:25, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,860 bytes) (→Present day: add radio station, but remove licence application claim which is not supported by reference and therefore may now be dated information) (undo)
24. (cur | prev) 22:24, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,675 bytes) (→History: remove radio station from this section) (undo)
25. (cur | prev) 22:21, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,952 bytes) (lower case link) (undo)
26. (cur | prev) 21:57, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,952 bytes) (→History: depth) (undo)
27. (cur | prev) 21:56, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,938 bytes) (→References: multi-column) (undo)
28. (cur | prev) 21:52, 18 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (6,924 bytes) (fix punctuation around refs. fix date format. convert units of measure. fix links. combine some short sections.) (undo)
29. (cur | prev) 21:25, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (7,074 bytes) (→Present day: bbc date) (undo)
30. (cur | prev) 21:14, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (7,054 bytes) (→Present day: BBC news ref.17-11-2010) (undo)
31. (cur | prev) 20:47, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (6,680 bytes) (→History: ref.footsteps) (undo)
32. (cur | prev) 20:34, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (6,478 bytes) (→History: indoor-pool size-disabled) (undo)
33. (cur | prev) 20:28, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (6,363 bytes) (→History: ref.1966 pool) (undo)
34. (cur | prev) 20:26, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (6,198 bytes) (→History: ref.culverhay sports centre) (undo)
35. (cur | prev) 17:05, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (6,033 bytes) (→History: ref.west twertton school) (undo)
36. (cur | prev) 16:57, 18 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (5,848 bytes) (→History: ref.westhill boys building) (undo)
37. (cur | prev) 11:43, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,670 bytes) (→History: spelling) (undo)
38. (cur | prev) 11:43, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,671 bytes) (→History: tweak ofsted) (undo)
39. (cur | prev) 11:41, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,587 bytes) (→History: Culverhay is not rated Outstanding by Ofsted.) (undo)
40. (cur | prev) 11:39, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,594 bytes) (→Present Day: heading fix) (undo)
41. (cur | prev) 11:39, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,593 bytes) (→History: Ofsted and Sportsmark link fix. Request citation for top 200 claim.) (undo)
42. (cur | prev) 11:30, 16 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (5,566 bytes) (removed Category:Education in Bath using HotCat) (undo)
43. (cur | prev) 11:08, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (5,597 bytes) (→External links: add category) (undo)
44. (cur | prev) 11:01, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (5,566 bytes) (→History: grammar) (undo)
45. (cur | prev) 10:57, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (5,559 bytes) (→Present Day: layout change) (undo)
46. (cur | prev) 10:56, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (5,111 bytes) (→Curriculum: layout change) (undo)
47. (cur | prev) 10:55, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) m (5,559 bytes) (ref,) (undo)
48. (cur | prev) 10:51, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (5,397 bytes) (→History: 2009 and ref.) (undo)
49. (cur | prev) 10:32, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (4,566 bytes) (curriculum and ref.) (undo)
50. (cur | prev) 10:15, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (4,118 bytes) (sections-layout) (undo)
51. (cur | prev) 10:13, 16 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (4,092 bytes) (wikilinks - school types) (undo)
52. (cur | prev) 14:09, 14 November 2010 Rodw (talk | contribs) (4,080 bytes) (remove deadlink - info is covered by BBC ref) (undo)
53. (cur | prev) 11:06, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (4,278 bytes) (fix reference) (undo)
54. (cur | prev) 11:06, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (4,215 bytes) (tweak date) (undo)
55. (cur | prev) 11:05, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (4,214 bytes) (Closure announcement) (undo)
56. (cur | prev) 11:01, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,866 bytes) (more about closure) (undo)
57. (cur | prev) 10:56, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,590 bytes) (specialist status) (undo)
58. (cur | prev) 10:53, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,492 bytes) (tweak ages in infobox) (undo)
59. (cur | prev) 10:51, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,492 bytes) (update pupil numbers) (undo)
60. (cur | prev) 10:47, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,469 bytes) (spelling) (undo)
61. (cur | prev) 10:47, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,469 bytes) (Remove LEA - no such thing any more.) (undo)
62. (cur | prev) 10:45, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,458 bytes) (add date to reference) (undo)
63. (cur | prev) 10:43, 8 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (3,443 bytes) (Remove some relinks which are unlikely to be created as articles) (undo)
64. (cur | prev) 10:34, 8 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (3,446 bytes) (1966 extra facilities) (undo)
65. (cur | prev) 10:23, 8 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (3,309 bytes) (layout and West Twerton School closure) (undo)
66. (cur | prev) 10:07, 8 November 2010 Francis E Williams (talk | contribs) (3,089 bytes) (update to schoo history and proposed closure in 2010) (undo)
67. (cur | prev) 13:45, 5 November 2010 Simple Bob (talk | contribs) (2,486 bytes) (remove peacock language) (undo)

pad

Useful Links

• Cheatsheet for Editing Wikipedia - WP:CHEAT
• Citation and Verifiability Maintenance Templates
• Citation Quick Reference - WP:CQR
• Citation Templates - WP:CITET
• Counter-Vandalism Unit Think Tank - WP:CVU-TT
• Ignore All Dramas: Essay on Not Responding - WP:IAD
• List of Cleanup Templates
• List of Lists of Wikipedia Maintenance Templates
• New Contributors' Help Page - WP:NCHQ
• Report persistent vandalism - WP:RVAN
• Templates for Editing Wikipedia - WP:TEMP
• Templates for Warning Users - WP:USETEMP
• Wikipedia Articles Needing Expert Attention
• Wikipedia Articles That Are Too Technical
• Wikipedia Articles With Disputed Accuracy
• Wikipedia's Most Vandalized Pages Watch List: Computing and Internet Section - WP:MVP
• Intersect Contribs This tool shows the pages edited by both of two users specified.
• prefix Search Useful for finding user subpages
• Soxred93 tools
• wikiblame
• wikistalk
• Traffic stats
• Watcher Identifies how many are watching a page
• Per-page contributions User's contributions for just a particular article
• Svick's Category Watchlist Identify additions and deletions from a category
• Francis E Williams (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi) Check for various types of contributions
• Citation wizard
• Check for broken Links
• Wikipedia citation tool for Google Books
• Catscan - to identify intersections of categories
• deletion log
• Load times
• article editing stats
• commons helper

INTERNET; I have been involved in the technical standards side of the Internet since it was created, I am the moderator of a Usenet newsgroup devoted to the business side of product development, a Wikipedia editor for various electronics-related topics, and I have a lot of experience optimizing websites for high search engine ranking -- as can be seen by searching Google for [ Electrical Engineer Resume ] and seeing which resume comes out on top.(Google blue)

Dorchester

Thank you for your clarification of the two Thomas Hardy's. However , the factual information content is still a valid contribution and has been reinstated. I refer you to study WP:OWN. Billy from Bath (talk) 12:37, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for improving my contribution to the lede. The skatepark location is now correct. Billy from Bath (talk) 17:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Accusing a good faith experienced editor of ownership, just because your errors are being corrected, is not civil or wise.Charles (talk) 08:59, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

I have reinstated my original comments to this talk page after this edit was made to remove them.[1]. Good faith "errors" were not being corrected but entirely removed. What other comment would be appropriate for four different edit reversions in a row?.Billy from Bath (talk) 09:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

The truth of this matter is that factual, spelling and grammar errors were being made to the Dorchester, Dorset article, without any references or sources: that is why they were removed. I would also remind this "editor" that it is entirely proper for a editor to remove content from their Talk page and it is edit warring to reinstate them. Thank you Charles for your entirely correct comments. Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

This can only be a matter of opinion, not based on recorded facts. I have "edited" Wikipedia under various pseudonyms for 6 years. Made 3,270 (so far undeleted) edits with an average of 500 characters each entry. I have no need for confirmaation of my ability as an "editor" here. Billy from Bath (talk) 19:55, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

Unlike you, I have no need for "pseudonyms", nor do I need "confirmaation" of you ability. Once again you are confirming your inability to edit by your various mistakes. I have already stated that my contribution above was my final comment to you. Please respect this, if you continue you may well find yourself blocked for your attitude and numerous errors. Please stop. Thank you, David J Johnson (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC) ( iuncludes a mistake corrected later )

This contributor has survived seven decades on this planet and is currently recovering from a Cerebral hemorrhage resuling in a half body stroke and eye defects caused by type 2 diabetes and as a result has decided to cease contributing to this project. Billy from Bath (talk) 10:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC) This contributor is also known as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Francis_E_Williams. Billy from Bath (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Good, you have been blocked anyway for being a sockpuppet account. David J Johnson (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

I don't think so ! ..A deliberate act on my part. Don't forget to look after your words carefully , keep the badge nice and shiny and watch out, the shepard will be here soon with your tea ..Ha Ha . Billy from Bath (talk) 17:59, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

I cannot and have not logged in as Francis E Williams nor as Billy from Bath it is not possible as the login logs will show. Every time my router is switched on it issues me with a dynamic host control protol ( DHCP ) controlled account from B>T.'s servers. So the above statement is neither factual or correct. What ever number is seen following this comment is not controlled by me. I would suugest that the user making this comment should accept the fact that (a) a genuine error was made with regard the wrong Thomas Hardy. (The sailor not the novelist. (b) The edit regarding the location of the skate park is correct as regard it is in fact opposite Brewery Square adjacent to the car parks used by the covered markets in Dorchester. The fact that I did not know the name of the road is why the contribution was reverted. No sourses were required for either contribution as they were addition to existing contributions. As the user removed my original comment from his talk page and then failed to notify me that he had in fact made a comment to me. I replied to his comment, as I am rightly allowed to do in a democracy. NOWHERE in this following comment from user David does it state "this is my final comment to you.".

I QUOTE "The truth of this matter is that factual, spelling and grammar errors were being made to the Dorchester, Dorset article, without any references or sources: that is why they were removed. I would also remind this "editor" that it is entirely proper for a editor to remove content from their Talk page and it is edit warring to reinstate them. Thank you Charles for your entirely correct comments. Regards, David, David J Johnson (talk) 12:14, 6 June 2015 (UTC) " unquote

The historical evidence of the talkpage history will show :- Comments 1 and 2 are User Billy, comment 3 is a comment from user Charles, comment 4 is Billy response to Charles. Comment 5 is the one quoted above from user David. Comment 6 is my response to user David. Comment 7 from user David icludes the words "Please stop".

I then posted the following addressed to no one in particular. As it can be seen User David made another "final comment" to user Billy.

This contributor has survived seven decades on this planet and is currently recovering from a Cerebral hemorrhage resuling in a half body stroke and eye defects caused by type 2 diabetes and as a result has decided to cease contributing to this project. Billy from Bath (talk) 10:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC) This contributor is also known as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Francis_E_Williams. Billy from Bath (talk) 11:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

   Good, you have been blocked anyway for being a sockpuppet account. David J Johnson (talk) 12:23, 7 June 2015 (UTC) 

User Billy was blocked from replying and replied with an un-logged I.P. address. So the above statement by a senoir editor with admin rights is totallly fabricated to attempt to mislead the reader and to colour the facts. 86.131.4.106 (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2015 (UTC)