User:Enigmaman/RfAvotes

Explanation of my votes edit

I do not vote on the vast majority of RfAs. This is primarily because I only vote when I have an opinion on a user, and I am not familiar with most of the candidates.

Supports edit

I will support whenever I see a candidate that, based on my interactions with him/her, I believe would make a good WP:administrator.

Opposes edit

You will very rarely see me oppose an RfA. Most users that I do not believe are qualified for adminship don't have a snowball's chance of passing one anyway, and thus why antagonize/pile on? In the rare case that I see a candidate that has an RfA with a good chance of passing, and I still believe the user is unqualified, I will carefully analyze the RfA and the user's contributions, and oppose. To this date, that has not happened. All of my opposes have been to RfAs that didn't have a chance of passing anyway, back when I still opposed in those cases.

Neutrals edit

I will never vote Neutral on an RfA, as it is pointless. If I have no opinion, I don't vote. If I have a comment on the RfA but not an opinion, I will put the comment in Discussion or under a different vote in the RfA.

here are some RfAs I have voted on:

Thanks edit

One of my favorite pictures

Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 74 supporting, 3 opposing, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have placed in me. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 18:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you edit

I can has mop?

Hi Enigmaman! Thank-you for your support in my RfA (91/1/1).

I take all the comments to heart and hope I can fulfil the role of being

an admin to the high standard that the community deserves.

Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 16:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the support edit

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, I got you something great but I can't show you because it's fair-use only. Excuse me, I mean non-free. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 14:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks edit

Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. --Shark face 217 20:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

WBOSITG's RfA edit

Hello Enigmaman, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for your participation in my RfA which was passed with a final tally of 114/10/4. I'm both shocked and honoured to gain so much support from users whom I admire and trust, and I hope I can avoid breaking that backing by being the best administrator I possibly can. I will take on board the opposition's comments and I hope to improve over the coming months and years. Once again, thank you! weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 20:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

My RfA edit

Hi Enigmaman; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)