Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Emschec22
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Emschec22/Minaret
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Minaret
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
Great job! You seemed to have put in a lot of time into your research and added a lot of sources. Although this article seemed to be pretty thorough, you still added a lot of valuable information. Your advanced language and diction also made the article flow with its original contents. Specifically, in the functions section, it was previously stated that minarets have visual symbolic purpose, but it did not go into detail on the symbolism, and you added in that needed information. You took the time to read the article and find the gaps that needed further research. Overall, I think you are just about ready to submit your edits to the actual article!