66.8 % TB : What article did you evaluate?
edit- no article identified
+ - 1. Is there a warning banner at the top of the article? Yes or No
No
If there is a warning banner, copy and paste the warning banner here.
Write an brief explanation of the reason the issues mentioned in the warning banner are important. For example, if the issue is “needs additional citations for verification,” why does that matter?
Please note: If the article you are evaluating does not have a warning banner, choose a warning banner from a different article and explain the warning that is in that banner.
+2. Is the lead section of the article easy to understand? Does it summarize the key points of the article?
Yes, it's pretty straight forward on what the article is going to be about.
+3. Is the structure of the article clear? “Are there several headings and subheadings, images and diagrams at appropriate places, and appendices and foonotes at the end?”
There are many subheadings and a few pictures.
+4. Are “the various aspects of the topic balanced well”? That is does it seem to provide a comprehensive overview of the topic?
Yes
+5. Does the article provide a “neutral point of view”? Does it read like an encyclopedia article instead of a persuasive essay?
It's more of an encyclopedia article because when you scrow down there's a table of content.
+6. Are the references and footnotes citing reliable sources? Do they point to scholarly and trustworthy information? Beware of references to blogs; look for references to books, scholarly journal articles, government sources, etc.
Yes it's trustworthy.
7. Look for these signs of bad quality and comment on their presence or absence from the article you are evaluating:
+a. is the lead section well-written, in clear, correct English?
yes
+b. are there “unsourced opinions” and/or “value statements which are not neutral”?
no
+c. does the article refer “to ‘some,’ ‘many,’ or other unnamed groups of people,” instead of specific organizations or authors or facts?
no
+d. does the article seem to omit aspects of the topic?
yes
+e. are some sections overly long compared to other sections of similar importance to the topic?
yes
+f. does the article lack sufficient references or footnotes?
no
+g. Look at the “View History” for the article. As you read the conversation there, do you see hostile dialogue or other evidence of lack of respectful treatment among the editors?
yes
Part 2:
+Currency (When was the last update of this article? hint: check the View History)
October 5,2016
- Authority (What evidence do you find that the author(s) of this article have the appropriate credentials to write on this topic?)
+Relevance (to your research topic)
Somewhat yes.
-Depth
+Information Format (I hope this one will be easy for you.)
General
+Object (what is the purpose for creating this article?)
The purpose of this article is to tell us the history of the internet, and how through time it started to affect our culture.
 | This is a user sandbox of Elly425. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |