WK10
Good Article: Adelaide : Adelaide
- great layout - nice lead and detailed contents page
- info box extremely helpful, provides a great snapshot
- great media
- written concisely and presented in a factual, encyclopaedic manner
- extensive references list from mostly reliable sources
- well in line with their wikiproject:cities - contains info-boxes and several other templates required to create a perfect article
- well documented, supported by factual information and reflects expert knowledge
- to a large extent stable, however in regards to education, values, entertainment and arts information has the possibility to change regularly
Bad Article: Aalten https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aalten
- great infobox - inline with wikiproject :)
- decent media choices, captures everything you need location wise
- clear title
- information disjointed and irrelevant to the purpose of the article
- content is lacking and not a substantial amount of information
- there is a decent amount of sources, however the relevance of these sources are questionable and perhaps not necessary to the article
- invalid links to articles that need to be created?
- the writing of the article is unbiased and neutral however does not provide information about the town as such
- too specific in the information provided, needs to be more broad
WK3
Activity 2:
Citation was needed for a quote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:River_Irk (talk page)- changes made
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_Irk (article - The River Irk)
worked with ewanmaddog/oles2129
Activity 4:
Article that needs clean up: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti
tag added (needs more biographical information): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti#Family
talk page edits: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Heraclius_I_of_Kakheti
WEEK 5
BONE WARS _ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bone_Wars
Why is it a featured article
- good intro and contents page
- well cited and good amount of references
- as it is a historical piece, chronologically ordered correctly with appropriate titles
- all images have a good explanatory caption, spread out evenly throughout the article to assist with understanding and visual
appeal
- content is good - depth without excess
- very objective and balanced in the way that it was written - factual - no bias between both parties in the 'war'
- full historical account including background rather than just a 'story'
- consistent sections in both its layout and also the formulation of content
WK6
Activity 1 -
Big 4 Holiday Parks - added 2 sources and the only 2 references that were there
WK7 - Tutorial (annotated feature article) - Article - Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)
- criticising this source https://www.theguardian.com/music/2009/feb/04/rihanna-michael-jackson-manu-dibango?INTCMP=SRCH
- newspaper is a questionable source already (useful but perhaps not reliable)
- author has written a lot of articles - increasing their independent verifiability
- publication date is within 2 years of song release and therefore still relevant
- source is not cited at all - can we believe the information?
- tone is unbiased and neutral in manner
- very short and does not provide in-depth information
- this source provides a small amount of information in the article and only referenced one - only used for a quote and information regarding the law suit