1. Court Decision
2. Articles
- Finnegan Article [1]
- OSBA Intellectual Property Newsletter (Spring 2011)[2]
- Berkeley Technology Law Journal (The Bolt)[3]
- Dewey & Leboeuf IP Watch Article[4]
- K&A Law Firm Article[5]
3. Blogs
- IPBIZ[6]
- The Patent Prospector[7]
- Speedy Federal Circuit Briefs[8]
- 717 Madison Place[9]
References
edit- ^ Bhateja, Rajiv K. (2011). "Period Between Entry of Judgment and Entry of Permanent Injunction Should Be Considered When Calculating Damages". Finnegan. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Donovan, Larry B. (2011). "Method Vs. Apparatus and Software Claims". OSBA. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Yeh, Robert (2010). "Finjan v. Secure Computing: Direct Infringement of Apparatus Claims by Software That Requires User Unlocking or Activation". BTLJ. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Sung, Lawrence M. (2010). "Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp" (PDF). DL. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ K&A Lawyers (2011). "Three Sets of Computer Patent Claims Save Patentee's Case on Appeal". complexip.com. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Ebert, Lawrence B. (2010). "Finjan hoses WebWasher at CAFC". Blogger.com. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ "The Patent Hawk" Contributor (2011). "Secured". patenthawk.com. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
{{cite web}}:|last=has generic name (help) - ^ Black, Allen (2010). "Viral Infringers: Locked software code "infects" a product with direct infringement liability, even if the code is not executable by users". patentlawyersite.com. Retrieved 30 September 2012.
- ^ Vobach, Bill (2010). "The "Latent Code" Cases". 717madisonplace.com. Retrieved 30 September 2012.