![]() | This user page or section is in a state of significant expansion or restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this user page has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with {{in use}} during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.
This page was last edited by Czar (talk | contribs) 12 days ago. (Update timer) |
Author | David Graeber |
---|---|
Subject | Anthropology |
Published | July 2011 (Melville House) |
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/David_Graeber_2015-03-07_%2816741093492%29_%28cropped%29.jpg/180px-David_Graeber_2015-03-07_%2816741093492%29_%28cropped%29.jpg)
External videos | |
---|---|
![]() |
Summary
editDebt probes the philosophical nature of debt, its origins, and its evolution. The book's author, David Graeber, cites anthropological evidence from the Ancient Near East through modern Madagascar to show how conceptions of interpersonal obligation compare between Western society of recent centuries and the traditional societies that preceded it.[1] Debt contends that money and financial debt have turned the natural human inclination and responsibilities to help one another into financial features, and in turn, degraded human ethics over centuries.[2] Graeber also uses historical examples to contend that the widespread absolution of debt, in the style of the biblical Jubilee, is a reasonable practice.[3]
The book's narrative is non-linear[4] and its breadth does not lend towards summary.[5] The chapters of its first half trace anthropological ideas of interpersonal obligation, redemption, honor, and barter before launching into a loosely chronological sequence of historical stages from prehistory through ancient civilizations, the Axial Age, the Middle Ages, the "Age of Great Capitalist Empires", and, since 1971, "the Beginning of Something Yet to Be Determined".[4] Graeber often breaks the general chronology to make connections across eras and cultures.[6] Runaway markets are a common theme.[7][8]
The invention of money
editGraeber writes that social exchange was the foundation for what would become economic transactions. At the heart of social interaction were mutual obligations. Exchanges in resolving murder, marriage, parentage, and treaties bound the exchangers in ties of love, hate, envy, and spite. These debts could not be precisely quantified and thus could never be precisely repaid. Even the idea of repaying these debts, he writes, would be offensive.[9] Present-day nuclear families preserve some of these qualities, such as the offense taken at the idea of one's parents giving their child a bill of childhood expenses.[10] By not quantifying their social relations, these "human economies" avoided making morality into impersonal calculations.[11]
The author then dismantles "the myth of barter", the popular story that cumbersome barter economies necessitated the invention of money.[11] While many standard economics textbooks retell this Adam Smith story, Graeber writes that there is no historical or anthropological evidence of barter preceding money. He ties the necessity for money to trust. Throughout history, trade happened between people who knew and trusted each other, and could become mutually indebted (as a kind of credit) instead of requiring immediate recompense. Barter only occurred between strangers, whose low trust and unlikelihood of future repayment required immediate settling of debt. In this way, credit between debtors begat money. The first money then, was a form of credit between debtors, like a bar tab or virtual IOU, rather than a physical commodity like gold or shells.[12]
Money and debt cannot exist without each other, Graeber writes: Money exists to satisfy debt, and debt, defined as "an obligation to pay a certain sum of money", cannot exist without money.[11]
Graeber argues that disembedded markets governed by neoclassical economics are a recent and arbitrary construct in human history.[7]
...
By this perspective, exchange, which is inherently uneven between two parties, was less about prices and transactions but overlapping social obligations. An obligation becomes a debt when it can be quantitatively calculated. He argues credit systems preceded money and barter, citing societies with currencies separate for everyday transactions and relationship-based indebtedness. Tribes of Africa and North America, for instance, had currencies for marriage and to mitigate consequential injuries (such as manslaughter) from becoming blood feuds. For instance, losing a daughter in marriage required recompense in brass rods or wampum.[7] Those special token currencies could not be exchanged for other items of trade since they had no equivalent or price, but recorded a form of distinct obligation only repayable through distinct forms of restitution.[13] Graeber also uses the examples of blood debts, in which debtors or their children are pledged as pawns until a debt could be repaid, or if repayment was impossible, defaulting could lead to slavery.[14] These exchange systems are superstructure, he argues, built atop "baseline communism": an underlying web of mutual, everyday cooperation including such interactions as requesting directions or a light.[15]
Graeber calls this "baseline communism" the "raw material of sociality" and "ultimate substance of social peace", and suggests that commitment to this form of reciprocity can counteract markets and debt traps, reinforce a mutual belief in the continuance of society, and assure that debts will be repaid. The author includes "baseline communism" alongside exchange and hierarchy as the three moral foundations of economics, appearing in all human societies.[16]
Cycles of credit and bullion
editThe latter half of Debt proposes that human history's dominant mode of exchange alternates between credit and bullion. For example, ancient agrarian cultures (3,500–800 BC) used credit money, Axial Age cultures (800 BC – 600 AD) used coins, the Middle Ages reverted to credit, and capitalist empires (1450–1971) relied on gold and silver bullion. Graeber argues that the United States' formal detachment from the gold standard in 1971 will constitute a new era of the long cycle, of which we are at the beginning.[16]
Graeber also argues that these cycles are driven by state violence, as credit proliferates in times of peace and trust, and is supplanted by precious metals in times of war and distrust. Bullion is simpler to trade and steal while credit requires a network of obligations.[16] Building on Geoffrey Ingham, Graeber extends a "military-coinage-slavery complex" in which early empires. For example, during Alexander the Great's conquest of Persia, the Persian mines and mints (coinage), staffed by enslaved prisoners of war, were repurposed to provide for Alexander's military. When those empires fell, the states of the Middle Ages used abstract money: paper, tally sticks, promissory notes. Capitalist empires returned to bullion, combining war, commerce, and colonial slavery. So while the global turn towards fiat currency, away from the Bretton Woods system's gold-backed bullion in 1971, would appear to be another turning of the cycle, away from war, empire, slavery, and debt bondage, instead we've seen the opposite, Graeber writes: the free-floating dollar appears to be entrenched in military power even deeper than before. Though, the author notes, we are only at the beginning of this period, if the pattern holds.[17]
At its end, the book is unoptimistic toward the future of capitalism and nation-states warring over national debt, propelled by environmental and nuclear threats. Nevertheless, Graeber intends to inject hope and reignite social possibilities by suggesting that humans can transform their institutions by building atop "baseline communism" in accordance of ability and need.[18] From the limited solutions Graeber offers, he favors a jubilee absolution of debt from which new social institutions can arise, ideally reflecting democratic rule, social inclusion, and anti-commodification.[19]
unsorted
editGraeber extends the arguments of anthropologist Marcel Mauss, who argued that primitive economies were based on voluntary gift-giving and, contrary to prominent teachings, early economies were not based on barter. Instead, primitive societies gave gifts to bind each other in mutual obligation. The Pacific societies studied by Mauss expressly chose mutual indebitedness over economic self-interest. Graeber traces this lineage to the present day by contending that relationships based on immeasurable duty and interdependence subsided as societal interactions became more transactional and money became valued in itself rather than as a token of favors. For instance, under ancient Mesopotamia, the oldest record of interest-bearing loans, farmers unable to repay debts lost their families into debt bondage. But before society could collapse, the kings would sporadically cancel all debts, as in the biblical Jubilee.[1] This option of state-canceled debt is among Debt's recurrent themes.[8]
The author reviews moral debts and its ties with religions, which refer to incalculable cosmic or divine debts, or debts greater than simply those owed to society. Monarchs sometimes reaffirmed their power by invoking such existential debts. Debt is also associated with sin in many languages. In the 17th century, as people began to treat each other as equals and "please" and thank you" shed their feudal connotations, individuals recognized receipt of natural rights but rather than a form of liberation, these ultimately became liberties to enslave oneself through one's own autonomous labor.[1]
Graeber lauds several solutions to this sort of new feudalism, including a biblical Jubilee absolution of debt for developing countries. The author affirms leisure time as a better measure of affluence than higher wages.[1]
While Graeber emphasizes the destructive power of markets, he takes larger issue with the idea that markets and states are dichotomous. It is false to separate them, he writes, because states create markets by guaranteeing the property rights and rules, and markets require states...[8]
Publication
editGraeber recounted the book's publisher, Melville House, contacting him in 2007, prior to the financial collapse, as an author who could have public appeal.[20] The Brooklyn-based independent publisher[21] was excited to hear about his work on the topic of debt, and Graeber was enticed at the prospect of writing for a broader audience than his activist and anthropologist peers, to influence a larger debate.[20] Melville House initially planned for a short book on the economy, which grew into a comprehensive exploration of financial relations. Melville House felt that an anthropologist and his knowledge of human impact would fulfill a missing need in the public dialogues on global finance.[2]
Graeber sought to apply anthropological research on human experience to contemporary issues—a practice, he has said, anthropologists abandoned. Graeber also wanted to expose "false views of money", such as debt as a zero-sum resource. For instance, alternative to the understanding that debt cancellation requires taxpayers to bail out other sectors, debt can instead be made unenforceable and thus cancelled without countermeasure, as in his recommended jubilee.[22] The author intended the book's subtitle—"The First 5,000 Years"—as a provocation. He felt that the economic order at the time of publication was untenable and likely to change within one or two generations.[23]
Keith Hart was Graeber's foremost influence in writing Debt. Hart, among the first anthropologists to discuss heterodox economics, distinguished between bullion and credit theories of money, and how money, paradoxically, is both. Atop this analysis, Graeber added historical examples of societies shifting between both uses.[20]
Intellectually, Graeber also saw himself as reconciling the traditions of Karl Marx and Marcel Mauss. The Marxist tradition, as he puts it, is about seeing how all things fit into a totality based on exploitation, but as a perspective, it risks making its adherents into cynics overcome by powerlessness. Alternatively, in Graeber's description of the Maussian tradition of cooperativism, all social possibilities are present—including democracy, dictatorship, oligarchy, individualism, and communism at once—and reinforce rather than contradict each other.[24]
Debt was released in July 2011 and was a success for its publisher.[21] By December, Debt was in its sixth printing, with growing demand. Its release coincided with "debt crisis" newspaper headlines for the United States Congress debt ceiling standoff and, two months later, Occupy Wall Street, in which the author was a major figure. Print sales outpaced ebook sales, and the former were especially popular in independent bookstores. When chain buyers hesitated at the author's obscurity and the book's intellectual and political content, Melville House opted for "underground" publicity through the Internet. Leading blogs, such as the economic blog Naked Capitalism, brought Debt enough visibility to catch the attention of mainstream outlets.[2] The book was translated first to German,[25] and subsequently into Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Chinese, Dutch, and Slovenian.[26]
Reception
editDebt received the Society for Cultural Anthropology's 2012 Gregory Bateson Book Prize[27] and the 2012 Bread and Roses Award for Radical Publishing.[28]
The author recounted Debt's press coverage as uneven: extensive press in Germany, some press in the United Kingdom, and disappointingly little in the United States, which he attributed to the country's greater policing of public discourse. A year after its release, Graeber told Anthropology Today, "almost no major newspapers or magazines have reviewed it" and National Public Radio took two or three interviews that did not air.[22] Shows expressed more interest in the author than the book. He had a cover story in Bloomberg Businessweek and appeared on Up with Chris Hayes (MSNBC) and Need to Know (PBS), but media outlets and chain buyers hesitated at the topic's intellectualism and politics, the author's obscurity, and the book's price and cover.[2] Despite this, Debt sold well and further propagated on local radio and Internet publicity,[22] especially via online blogs. The book reached both the #2 spot in Amazon Germany's bestseller chart and Amazon Italy's top ten.[2]
Economist Thomas Piketty and celebrity Russell Brand praised the book.[29] Anthropologist Gillian Tett wrote that the book was both interesting and timely, especially its call for a jubilee for personal and national debts.[29] Thomas Meaney for The New York Times described the book as a field report on Western economic and moral collapse.[1] Critics noted the book's timeliness in coinciding with the 2008 financial crash,[29][19] and British historian Robin Blackburn thought that the choice to not address the crash was a missed opportunity, given how Graeber's point on market-state connectedness was proven by the big banks' reliance on a state capital bailout.[19]
Aside from its anthropological contribution to global history, Debt functioned as an "intellectual credo" for Graeber as an "anti-capitalist scholar-activist".[4] The New York Times suggested that Debt may surpass Graeber's anarchist activism as his most important contribution to Occupy Wall Street.[1] The book was common within Occupy movement makeshift libraries across the United States.[30]
The Times reviewer suggested that Graeber's anthropological examples appeared too distant from his utopian solutions for today,[1] and the New Left Review wished that Graeber had outlined how a post-jubilee world would look or work.[19] Debt, the reviewer wrote, illuminated the need for works on how healthy credit should function.[31]
Graeber noted an exceptional reception in Germany, where Debt remained a best seller for eleven weeks and sold over 100,000 copies. On his tour of Germany, he interviewed across major media outlets, including an appearance on a Maybrit Illner show panel with politicians.[25] Graeber postulated that the book owes its German popularity to the country's intellectual discontent towards topics of debt, often portrayed as an inescapable moral discourse. He also felt that anthropology was more effective a vehicle than economics for his message, as ideological factions in economics made it easier to write off sets of ideas.[24]
Legacy
editLooking back on this moment, we know the debt will be cancelled. Among those taking a long-term perspective, everyone agrees on that. The question is, How will that be done, and what’s going to happen after that?
David Graeber, 2014[32]
The book made Graeber famous[29] and was the subject of a June 2018 conference at the University of Birmingham.[33] Debt's advocacy for a jubilee absolution of debt was the impetus for Strike Debt, an offshoot of the Occupy movement that purchased and forgave monetary debt on the secondary market.[34] The group also advocated for debt erasure as public policy and for eliminating the stigma behind defaulting.[35]
Notes
edit- ^ a b c d e f g Meaney 2011.
- ^ a b c d e Habash 2011.
- ^ Cook 2013, pp. 85–86.
- ^ a b c Blackburn 2013, p. 141.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 86.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, pp. 141–142.
- ^ a b c Blackburn 2013, p. 142.
- ^ a b c Blackburn 2013, p. 147.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 87.
- ^ Cook 2013, pp. 87–88.
- ^ a b c Cook 2013, p. 88.
- ^ Cook 2013, pp. 88–89.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, pp. 142–143.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, p. 143.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, pp. 143–144.
- ^ a b c Blackburn 2013, p. 144.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, p. 145.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, pp. 148–149.
- ^ a b c d Blackburn 2013, p. 149.
- ^ a b c Appel 2014, p. 168.
- ^ a b Deahl 2011.
- ^ a b c Houtman, Gustaaf (October 2012). "The Occupy Movement and Debt: An Interview with David Graeber". Anthropology Today. 28 (5): 17–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00898.x. ISSN 1467-8322.
- ^ Lateu, Jo (February 1, 2014). "David Graeber". New Internationalist (469): 46. ISSN 0305-9529.
- ^ a b Appel 2014, p. 170.
- ^ a b Appel 2014, p. 169.
- ^
- Varela, Octavio Barriuso (July–December 2014). "Rev. of En deuda. Una historia alternativa de la economía". Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy (in Spanish). 3 (5): 121–125. ISSN 2255-3827.
- Cayla, David (October 19, 2015). "Rev. of Dette : 5000 ans d'histoire". Revue de la régulation. Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs (in French) (18): 1–13. doi:10.4000/regulation.11412. ISSN 1957-7796.
- Bellanca, Nicolò (2013). "Il debito come dispositivo di schiavitù. Una nota su David Graeber (Rev. of Debito. I primi 5.000 anni)" (PDF). Jura Gentium, Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale (in Italian) (1): 1–7. ISSN 1826-8269.
- Díez, Javier González (2013). "David Graeber: un'antropologia per la rivoluzione. Movimenti, etnografia, democrazia diretta e società contro lo Stato (Rev. of Debito. I primi 5.000 anni)". L'Indice dei libri del mese (in Italian) (7/8): 14. ISSN 0393-3903.
- Camarinha Lopes, Tiago (July 2016). "Rev. of Dívida: os primeiros 5000 anos". Política Democrática – Revista de Política e Cultura (in Portuguese): 189–195. ISSN 1518-7446.
- Vymyatnina, Yulia; Guschina, Ekaterina (2016). "Rev. of Dolg: pervye 5000 let istorii". Antropologicheskij Forum (in Russian) (31): 267–277. ISSN 1815-8870.
- Yudin, Greg (2016). "Долговые книги и книга о долге [Debt Books and a Book on Debts] (Rev. of Долг: первые 5000 лет истории/Dolg: pervye 5000 let istorii)". Journal of Economic Sociology (in Russian). 17 (1): 113–121. doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2016-1-113-121. ISSN 1726-3247.
- https://www.worldcat.org/title/zhai-di-1-ge-5000-nian/oclc/833293811
- https://www.worldcat.org/title/schuld-de-eerste-5000-jaar/oclc/797468688
- https://www.worldcat.org/title/dolg-prvih-5000-let-dolnitva/oclc/898638381
- ^ https://culanth.org/pages/prizes
- ^ Allen, Katie (May 2, 2012). "'Dazzling' winner for Bread and Roses award". The Bookseller. Retrieved January 7, 2019.
- ^ a b c d Jeffries, Stuart (March 21, 2015). "David Graeber interview: 'So many people spend their working lives doing jobs they think are unnecessary'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on March 26, 2017.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 85.
- ^ Blackburn 2013, p. 150.
- ^ Appel 2014, p. 173.
- ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on October 5, 2017. Retrieved September 6, 2017.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ Cook 2013, pp. 83–85.
- ^ Cook 2013, p. 84.
Bibliography
edit- Abend, Pablo; Richterich, Annika (2015). "Occupy and Academia: Investigating a Socio-Political Laboratory". Media Fields Journal (9). ISSN 2159-7553.
- Appel, Hannah Chadeayne (2014). "Finance Is Just Another Word for Other People's Debts" (PDF). Radical History Review. 2014 (118): 159–173. doi:10.1215/01636545-2350939. ISSN 0163-6545 – via EBSCOhost.
- Atik, Jeffery (January 1, 2013). "The Cliff and the Jubilee: On David Graeber's 'Debt'". Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Bain-Selbo, Eric (November 5, 2014). "Deep in Debt A Review of David Graeber's Debt: The First 5,000 Years (review)". Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 97 (4): 491–508. doi:10.5325/soundings.97.4.0491. ISSN 2161-6302 – via Project MUSE.
- Beggs, Mike (August 27, 2012). "Debt: The First 500 Pages". Jacobin. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- — (September 20, 2012). "On Debt: A Reply to Josh Mason". Jacobin. Retrieved July 5, 2017.
- Blackburn, Robin (January–February 2013). "Finance for Anarchists". New Left Review. II (79): 141–150. ISSN 0028-6060.
- Brandom, Russell (August 17, 2011). "A Brief History of Debt". The L Magazine. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- Brass, Tom (February 2014). "A stroll in Zuccotti Park?". Capital & Class. 38 (1): 253–257. doi:10.1177/0309816813514827. ISSN 0309-8168. S2CID 154382842.
- Bunia, Remigius (June 1, 2012). "In der Gewalt der Schulden". Merkur (in German). 66 (6): 535–542. ISSN 0026-0096.
- Carey, Peter (November 26, 2011). "Christmas gifts 2011: which books will be under your tree?". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712.
- Coco, Linda (May 2013). "Debt: The First 5,000 Years". PoLAR: The Political and Legal Anthropology Review. 36 (1): 176–178. doi:10.1111/plar.12010. ISSN 1555-2934 – via Book Review Index Plus.
- Confavreux, Joseph; Lindgaard, Jade (July 8, 2014). Plenel, Edwy (ed.). "Soak the Rich". The Baffler. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, Donald.
- Constant, Paul (February 7, 2012). "The Difference Between Borrow and Debt". The Stranger. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- — (April 21, 2014). "In Culture News: Netflix Hikes Prices, Ballet Throws Teen Night, and the Northwest's Best Forgotten Sculptor". The Stranger. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- Cook, Eli (2013). "Can David Graeber Become the Marx of the Debtor Class?". Raritan. 33 (2): 83–100, 166. ISSN 0275-1607 – via ProQuest.
- Deahl, Rachel (October 3, 2011). "Melville House Staffs Up, Overhauls Web Site". Publishers Weekly. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Despain, Hans G. (June 2014). "Book Review: Financial Crises: Socio-Economic Causes and Institutional Context and Debt: The First 5,000 Years". Review of Radical Political Economics. 46 (2): 252–257. doi:10.1177/0486613413497918. ISSN 0486-6134. S2CID 155490559 – via Book Review Index Plus.
- Doctorow, Cory (April 17, 2012). "Why Debt is creeping into so many science fiction discussions". Boing Boing. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- — (July 2, 2013). "Stross's Neptune's Brood: science fictional companion to Graeber's Debt". Boing Boing. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Flood, Alison (March 6, 2012). "New prize for radical writing announces shortlist". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.
- Fryc, Mallory (August 15, 2012). "David Graeber Awarded the 2012 Bateson Prize — Cultural Anthropology". Cultural Anthropology. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Gharavi, Maryam Monalisa (September 10, 2013). "A History of Debt". Social Text. ISSN 1527-1951. Archived from the original on September 10, 2013.
- Graeber, David (July 21, 2011). "Taking a very long view on the debt crisis". Washington Post. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- — (August 1, 2011). "Can We Still Write Big Question Sorts of Books?". Savage Minds. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- — (April 2, 2012). "Seminar on Debt: The First 5000 Years – Reply". Crooked Timber. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Gregory, Chris (April 2016). "'Forgive us our Debt, as we Forgive our Debtors': Our Debt to Graeber". Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology. 17 (2): 176–181. doi:10.1080/14442213.2015.1103359. ISSN 1444-2213. S2CID 147009850.
- Habash, Gabe (December 2, 2011). "Melville House Finds Hit for the 99%". Publishers Weekly. 258 (49): 9–10. ISSN 0000-0019 – via EBSCOhost.
- Hann, Chris (April 2012). "Debt: The First 5000 Years". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 54 (2): 447–449. doi:10.1017/S0010417512000102. ISSN 0010-4175. S2CID 145465259 – via ProQuest.
- Hart, Keith (June 2016). "The Anthropology of Debt". Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 22 (2): 415–421. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.12406. ISSN 1467-9655. Also see Hart's blog for his personal review, "In Rousseau’s footsteps: David Graeber and the anthropology of unequal society". July 4, 2012.
- Hembruff, Jesse (May 2013). "Critical Review: the politics of sovereign debt". Third World Quarterly. 34 (4): 710–725. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.786293. ISSN 0143-6597. S2CID 154599964 – via EBSCOhost.
- Huato, Julio (April 2015). "Graeber's Debt: When a Wealth of Facts Confronts a Poverty of Theory". Science & Society. 79 (2): 318–325. doi:10.1521/siso.2015.79.2.318. ISSN 0036-8237 – via ProQuest.
- Inglis, Fred (May 14, 2015). "Quick, to the Batmobile! (Rev. of The Utopia of Rules)". Times Higher Education (2203): 50–51. ISSN 0049-3929 – via EBSCOhost.
- Johnson, David V. (February 15, 2012). "What We Owe to Each Other: An Interview with David Graeber". Boston Review. Retrieved September 6, 2017.
- Jones, Rachel (March 19, 2012). "Bookforum talks with David Graeber". Bookforum. Retrieved September 6, 2017.
- Kalb, Don (2014). "Mavericks: Harvey, Graeber, and the reunification of anarchism and Marxism in world anthropology". Focaal. 2014 (69): 113–134. doi:10.3167/fcl.2014.690108. ISSN 1558-5263.
- Knight, Chris (September 29, 2011). "What are you reading?". Times Higher Education (2018): 57 – via Gale.
- Knight, Chris (June 2, 2021). "Did communism make us human?". The Brooklyn Rail. Retrieved August 6, 2024.
- Krause, Ruth (June 25, 2012). "Occupy author examines archeology of debt". Deutsche Welle. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
- Kunkel, Benjamin (May 10, 2012). "Forgive us our debts". London Review of Books. pp. 23–29. ISSN 0260-9592.
- Kuttner, Robert (May 9, 2013). "The Debt We Shouldn't Pay". The New York Review of Books. 60 (8): 16–18. ISSN 0028-7504.
- Lewis, Stephen (January–February 2013). "Debunking the Myth". Resurgence & Ecologist (276): 61. ISSN 2051-2287 – via EBSCOhost.
- Luban, Daniel (2012). "Indebted". Dissent. 59 (2): 102–106. doi:10.1353/dss.2012.0050. S2CID 245905818.
- Lŭbberding, Frank (May 25, 2012). "Frühkritik: Maybrit Illner: Kommunismus oder Naturalwirtschaft?". Frankfurter Allgemeine (in German). Retrieved October 4, 2017.
- Mason, J. W. (September 18, 2012). "In Defense of David Graeber's Debt". Jacobin. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Mason, Paul (December 2, 2011). "Books for giving: economics". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077.
- Maurer, Bill (March 2013). "Debating anthropology's assumptions, relevance and future: David Graeber's Wunderkammer, Debt: The First 5 000 Years". Anthropological Forum. 23 (1): 79–93. doi:10.1080/00664677.2012.729492. ISSN 0066-4677. S2CID 144042113 – via EBSCOhost.
- McBride, Keally (March 13, 2013). "Pushing the Limits of Political Theory: Ferguson's Emma Goldman, and Graeber's Debt". Theory & Event. 16 (1). ISSN 1092-311X – via Project MUSE.
- Meaney, Thomas (December 8, 2011). "Anarchist Anthropology". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331.
- Merrill, Michael (2013). "Forgive Us Our Debts!". New Labor Forum. 22 (3): 101–104. doi:10.1177/1095796013497690. ISSN 1095-7960. JSTOR 24718497. S2CID 155690874.
- Mudede, Charles (December 9, 2011). "My Books of the Year". The Stranger. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- — (January 25, 2012). "One of the Founders of Occupy Wall Street, David Graeber, Answers Your Questions on Slog". The Stranger. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- — (February 1, 2012). "The Walking Debt". The Stranger. Retrieved June 30, 2017.
- Noah, Timothy (December 26, 2020). "David Graeber: The Anarchist Anthropologist-Provocateur". Politico. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
- Patel, Raj (October 17, 2011). "Debt: The First 5,000 Years, by David Graeber". The Globe and Mail.
- Rebello, Joseph (April 2013). "Rev. of Debt: The First 5,000 Years". Rethinking Marxism. 25 (2): 293–295. doi:10.1080/08935696.2013.769359. ISSN 0893-5696. S2CID 155024064.
- Reichert, Wolf-Gero (August 24, 2012). "Was eigentlich sind Schulden?" (PDF). Publik-Forum (in German). No. 16. pp. 16–17.
- Richter, Konstantin (May 14, 2012). "David Graeber: Der böse Geist des Geldes". Die Welt (in German). ISSN 0173-8437.
- Schirrmacher, Frank (November 13, 2011). "Eurokrise: Und vergib uns unsere Schulden". Frankfurter Allgemeine (in German). Retrieved October 4, 2017.
- "Schuld und Liebe". Der Spiegel (in German). Vol. 47. November 21, 2011. ISSN 0038-7452.
- Schwabsky, Barry (January 15, 2017). "Reader's Diary: David Graeber's 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years'". Hyperallergic. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Shea, Christopher (April 19, 2013). "A Radical Anthropologist Finds Himself in Academic Exile". Chronicle of Higher Education. 59 (32): A14–A15. ISSN 0009-5982.
- Singal, Jesse (July 20, 2011). "Making a case against unsustainable debt". The Boston Globe.
- Smith, Justin E. H. (December 15, 2011). "Debt by David Graeber". Bookforum. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Spencer, Annie (2014). "Woman Is an Object Without History (and Other Reflections upon Reading David Graeber's 'Debt: The First 5,000 Years')". Women's Studies Quarterly. 42 (1/2): 38–45. ISSN 0732-1562. JSTOR 24364905.
- Spicksley, Judith (February 2013). "Rev. of Debt: The First 5,000 Years". The Economic History Review. 66 (1): 369–371. doi:10.1111/ehr.12005_16. ISSN 0013-0117.
- Stützle, Ingo (May 18, 2012). "Diskussion In David Graebers Buch »Schulden - Die ersten 5.000 Jahre« fehlt die Kapitalismusanalyse". Analyse & Kritik (in German). No. 572.
- Taylor, Astra (April 30, 2012). "Debt". n+1.
- Tett, Gillian (September 9, 2011). "Debt: it's back to the future". Financial Times. Archived from the original on October 5, 2017. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Walton, Jo (April 16, 2012). "The Best Science Fiction Ideas in any Non-Fiction Ever: David Graeber's Debt: The First Five Thousand Years". Tor.com. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Whaley, Mary (July 11, 2011). "Rev. of Debt: The First 5,000 Years, by David Graeber". Booklist.
Further reading
edit- Bertram, Chris (February 28, 2012). "Seminar on David Graeber's Debt – admin notice". Crooked Timber. Retrieved June 29, 2017.
- Schmid, Karl (May 14, 2014). "Debt: The First 5,000 Years by David Graeber (review)". Anthropologica. 56 (1): 244–246. ISSN 2292-3586 – via Project MUSE.
- http://www.upenn.edu/pennpress/book/toc/15102.html
What endures across time and space is the flexibility of debt as a concept that underwrites morally murky ideologies and ethically ambiguous practices. David Graeber in Debt: The First 5,000 Years has provocatively suggested that "the real origins of money are to be found in crime and recompense, war and slavery, honor, debt, and redemption." Graeber is my interlocutor throughout this book, as I seek to set his bold claims in historical context and test their validity in light of the ways that early moderns understood debt bondage, ways that fashioned the framework for thinking about forfeiture for the next four hundred years. The question that drives me is: What can the historical imagination of debt tell us about our present imaginary? My innovation, however, is to begin not with this question but rather with what I understand to be the answer: Institutions are able to protect creditors because the state assists them in penalizing debtors. Who could have ever imagined such a phenomenon?