Csr19us

About This User...

This user comes from the
United States of America.

enThis user is a native speaker of the English language.

ko-1이 사용자는 간단한 한국어를 말할 수 있습니다.

es-1Este usuario puede contribuir con un nivel básico de español.

Wikipedia

This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website. Because of real life, this user will be editing on and off. This user is a preservationist who believes Wikipedians should avoid agressive non-notability deletion and advocates that the notability rule be amended to specify that any subject with some historical value can merit an article. Details here. inclThis user is an inclusionist. GThis user will use Google before asking dumb questions. This user wants to see everything in its place. This user respects copyright, but sometimes it can be a major pain. This user contributes using Linux.

Interests
This user is interested in South Korea. This user is a Time Lord. BENDER B. RODRIGUEZBite this user's shiny metal ass! This user is a walking, Swedish murder machine. This user built their own PC.

Skills

A&EThis user is an expert in Computer architecture and engineering. DESThis user is an expert in Design. W3CThis user believes in compliance with W3C standards. asp-2This user is an intermediate ASP programmer. vbs-2This user is an intermediate VBScript programmer. C-3This user is an advanced C programmer. js-5This user is a professional JavaScript programmer. PHP This user is an advanced PHP Coder.

About Me

I'm a casual Wikipedia editor currently residing in Indiana, United States. Some of my interests include:

• Technology, computers and Internet
• Android, Linux and programming
• Korea, and East Asia, in general
• Weather, storms and natural phenomena

My Editing Personality

I might be what you call an "inclusionist." I don't like to see information deleted. If something is to be removed, then I think it should at least be considered how to explain it differently. As much as I hate commercial pollution of Wikipedia, you can still use language to make it clear that it may not be "encyclopedic," in nature. I believe leaving even the undesirable content in Wikipedia (as long as its explained in such way) can be encyclopedic, in and of itself. Having said that, though, I don't particularly like the idea of this whole "deletionist vs. inclusionist" mentality... editing wars suck.