Fashion Industry edit

 
Landfill; where a majority of discarded clothing ends up.

The fashion sector is a major contributor to air, land, and water pollution. This industry accounts for 10% of carbon emissions.[1] In textile production, there is a high use of chemicals and water, which then find their way back into waterways.[2] In the US, over 85% of discarded clothes end up in landfills.[1]

The industry’s main goal is obsolescence-[3] new trends are constantly being put out to encourage consumption. Fast fashion has become increasingly popular, as it allows consumers to keep up with and then discard these trends at a low cost.

Companies often outsource their manufacturing to less developed countries to further reduce costs for consumers, which has led to the exploitation of workers, a complex supply chain, and pollution due to transportation.[2] Insourcing products to their own facilities that they can maintain a strict standard over would lessen these issues.

Textile waste can be reduced by making higher quality garments that are built to last. A general rule of thumb for fast fashion companies is a “10 wash mark," in which clothes are made to last about ten cycles through a washer and dryer.[3] By extending the practical life of a garment, people can use their clothes for longer periods of time before having to discard them, and thus consume and waste less. Textile waste may also be reduced through recycling and upcycling textile initiatives.[4]

Research and development can also be invested into more eco-friendly dyeing methods. ColorZen has developed a process of dyeing cotton using 75% less energy and 90% less water.[5]

Agricultural Sector edit

The agricultural sector is a major source of food waste, and also contributes to air, land, and water pollution. Food waste is a major component of landfills, which are in turn a major source of methane (a major global warming contributor).[6]

Implementing a variety of sustainability measures would allow for the redistribution of edible food that would have otherwise been wasted, the reduction of competition for limited resources, and the reduction of pollution.[6]

Crop diversification and crop rotation are more sustainable farming practices. They allow for healthier soil, which in turn reduces the need for fertilizers, which then reduces the amount of fertilizer runoff. It also helps in reducing the amount of insects and weeds, which would reduce the use of pesticides. Fertilizer runoff and pesticides both have the potential to disrupt and harm ecosystems. Having multiple crops, as opposed to monoculture, reduces the potential of entire crop yields failing- particularly in a time of climate change.[7]

 
Pesticides being sprayed over crops.

Alternative forms of pesticides also contribute to sustainability. Birds, for example, play an important ecological role in the reduction of insect populations; using birds as a natural way of getting rid of insects could decrease the amount of pesticides used.[8]

Water usage in agriculture can also be reduced, which would allow for the resource to be redistributed elsewhere. One method of this is drip irrigation, in which water is delivered directly to the roots of crops. This allows for less water to be used, since less water is lost to evaporation.[9]

Although some food waste is unavoidable, such as bones or peels, there is a large component of avoidable waste. This is due to issues with over purchasing, poor preparation, and inadequate storage.[6] In the US, “10.1 million tons [of food] are left unused on farms and in packing facilities each year.”[10] Implementing government tax deductions may provide an incentive for those in the agricultural sector to donate food that would have otherwise been wasted.[10]

  1. ^ a b Sustainability in the textile and apparel industries : consumerism and fashion sustainability. Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu, Miguel Ángel Gardetti. Cham: Springer. 2020. ISBN 978-3-030-38532-3. OCLC 1147258468.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  2. ^ a b Rafi-Ul-Shan, Piyya Muhammad; Grant, David B.; Perry, Patsy; Ahmed, Shehzad (2018-05-14). "Relationship between sustainability and risk management in fashion supply chains: A systematic literature review". International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 46 (5): 466–486. doi:10.1108/IJRDM-04-2017-0092. ISSN 0959-0552.
  3. ^ a b Fast fashion, fashion brands and sustainable consumption. Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu. Singapore. 2019. ISBN 978-981-13-1268-7. OCLC 1041931248.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  4. ^ Textiles and clothing sustainability : recycled and upcycled textiles and fashion. Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu. Singapore. 2016. ISBN 978-981-10-2146-6. OCLC 956376348.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: others (link)
  5. ^ "Better way to dye". Crain's New York Business. 2018-06-18. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  6. ^ a b c Yevich, Rosemarie; Logan, Jennifer A. (2003). "An assessment of biofuel use and burning of agricultural waste in the developing world". Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 17 (4). doi:10.1029/2002GB001952. ISSN 1944-9224.
  7. ^ Roesch-McNally, Gabrielle E.; Arbuckle, J. G.; Tyndall, John C. (2018-01-01). "Barriers to implementing climate resilient agricultural strategies: The case of crop diversification in the U.S. Corn Belt". Global Environmental Change. 48: 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.002. ISSN 0959-3780.
  8. ^ "Gale - Institution Finder". galeapps.gale.com. Retrieved 2021-03-01.
  9. ^ Laib, K.; Hartani, T.; Bouarfa, S.; Kuper, M.; Mailhol, J. C. (2018). "Connecting Drip Irrigation Performance to Farmers' Practices: The Case of Greenhouse Horticulture in the Algerian Sahara". Irrigation and Drainage. 67 (3): 392–403. doi:10.1002/ird.2228. ISSN 1531-0361.
  10. ^ a b "Food and Tech: Solutions to Recover and Redistribute Food Waste". NYC Food Policy Center. 2019-06-26. Retrieved 2021-03-01.