 | This user is a student editor in Las_Positas_College/LIBR_1_Working_with_Sources_(Fall_2017). |
Article Evaluation edit
1. Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? The article is relevant to the topics. No distractions found.
2. Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? The article is neutral. It is not biased.
3. Are there viewpoints that are over-represented, or underrepresented? No.
4. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The reference link for Number 8 and 18 are broken. The others function properly.
5. Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? Yes. Most of the information comes from EBSCOhost. The rest is from NBC News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and various other trusted news sources.
6. Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? Some reference links are from five plus years ago. There are some that are fairly recent.
7. Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? It needs a photograph for the article. It has been rated as "C-Class" on a quality scale.
8. How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It's been rated "C-Class" for its quality. It is in scope with WikiProject Africa and is supported by WikiProject Kenya.
9. How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? N/A