User:Cassiopeia/NPPS/WikiMacaroons

Hello, welcome to your New Page Patrol School page! Every person I instruct will have their own page on which I will give them support and tasks for them to complete. Please make sure you have this page added to your watchlist. Your NPP School page has been specifically designed according to you and what you have requested instruction in - for that reason, please be as specific as possible when under my instruction, so that I know the best ways to help you (and do not be afraid to let me know if you think something isn't working).

Make sure you read through Wikipedia:Notability as that's the knowledge which most of the questions I ask you and tasks you do will revolve around.

How to use this page

This page will be built up over your time in the Academy, with new sections being added as you complete old ones. Each section will end with a task, written in bold type - this might just ask a question, or it might require you to go and do something. You can answer a question by typing the answer below the task; if you have to do something, you will need to provide diffs to demonstrate that you have completed the task. Some sections will have more than one task, sometimes additional tasks may be added to a section as you complete them. Please always sign your responses to tasks as you would on a talk page.

If both the instructor and student make completing the course curriculum a top priority, it will generally take around a month to go through the entirety of the curriculum. This pace is not required or necessarily expected, but rather is provided in order to give participants an idea of what to expect.

Notability

PART 1

When patrolling or reviewing an article, you may often come across articles do not meet the WP:N guidelines, but the editors make the edits in good faith. Please read WP:AGF and do not WP:BITE the new editors.

A. Notability is a test guidelines to decide whether a given topic warrants its own article in Wikipedia mainspace. Please read Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, General Notability Guidelines, Specific Notability Guidelines, Stand-alone list before completing the following tasks.

General notability guidelines

1. In your own words, why it is important to WP:AGF and not WP:BITE new editors.

Answer: It's important to know that new contributors (and experienced ones) will make mistakes, and some will lead to conflict. Most of the time, people aren't actively trying to harm and may be ignorant to wikipedia's policies, unaware of how what they've written sounds, etc. The bottom line is, assume that the person is well-meaning, and turn their enthusiasm in a positive direction.

Y.It's obvious that anybody in the new to Wikipedia would make some mistakes for no knowing Wikipedia guidelines, markup, protocols. For such it is important not to attacks new editors which may result in unpleasant situations such as fights or their leave and subsequent loss to the community instead we should educate and support them them in a civilized manner. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

2. In your own words, how does notability is defined in Wikipedia?

Answer: Notability is how users check to see whether a subject could be considered well-known enough to be on Wikipedia. Checks should be made on whether it meets the General Notability Guideline: the subject matter is backed up by reliable sources, and not just in passing mentions. It may also have to meet a subject-specific notability guideline. If it falls under What Wikipedia is not, then it's probably non-notable.

Y. In Wikipedia, notability means "worthy to be noted" - it is defined as a topic is "presumably" notable for stand-alone article or list if (1) it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject whee by the sources talk "directly" about the subject in depth and in length and not only passing mentioned and (2) it is not excluded under the What WP:Wikipedia is not policy. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

3. Does a step by step instructions on how to "Change a car tire" considered a notable topic in Wikipedia?

Answer: No, as per WP:NOTMANUAL. It likely will be backed up by reliable sources, but is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.

Y. Right as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a how to manual site. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

4. What are the differences between A WP:GNG and a specific notability guidelines? how do we determine which one to use when patrolling an article?

Answer: General Notability Guideline is a basic criteria that all articles should cover. A specific notability guideline is certain criteria for topics that should be met, e.g Books should follow the SNG for writings. Use both to determine the notability of an article.

Y. Both can be used when patrolling but those subject falls under SNG/SSG (sport specific guidelines) but fails to meet the WP:GNG guidelines would sometimes nominated for deleteion WP:AfD for discussion to determine the status of the article. (We will cover AfD in later assignment in later assignment). Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Specific notability guidelines

5. If an editor creates an article about "2024 Summer Olympics" in 2019 without providing any sources, is the subject considered not notable and why?

Answer: If there is already preparation for this future event (as per WP:EVENT) then look for sources to add to the article. If there are a good amount of potential sources, then the article could be improved, and is considered notable.

Y. Good. As a reviewer, it is a good will act to find sources to strengthen the notability of the subject if we know where to find the source and know the subject is potentially notable. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

B. Without considered of sources/content policies and review just based on "subject specific notability" (SSN) "alone" for sake of the exercises below, please answer if the subject meets the SSN guidelines, based on the given content below, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

6. A New York city based 2019 start up software company , specializing in data mining, has just received a USD 200K investor fund.

Answer: Fails SNG for corporations, (WP:ORG) receiving investments doesn't make it notable.

Y. WP:CORP is a very strict SSN guidelines - when reviewing a company article we need to make sure WP:CORP guidelines is met as we have billions of companies existed in the world. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

7. Nascimento Ferreira who is a Ultimate Fighting Championships fighters with the undefeated mixed martial arts record of 8-0.

Answer: Looks like they meet the MMA guideline, (WP:NMMA) have been in 8 fights, minimum is 3 to be notable.

N. Please read the WP:NMMA again as it states "Have fought at least three professional fights for a top-tier MMA organization, such as the UFC (see WP:MMATIER)" and if you read WP:MMATIER it states top tier promoter today is UFC or Invicta. Ferreira has only one fight under UFC at the present stage see here. When reading guidelines, we also need to read other links to search for more info for further understanding of the guidelines. For sport person SSN notability is depending on the sport they play, some SSN specify signed by certain club, some indicated a play/match need to be secure before notable, other such as MMA fighters need at least 3 fights to meet MMABIO guidlines, in short, we need to read the SSN to understand the requirements. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

8. A upcoming action drama title "Suleiman the Great" based on the the life of Suleiman the Magnificent, was reported will be in production in December 2020 and to be released on August 2022 in the cinemas.

Answer: Fails WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles". This means that just because the production has started filming doesn't make it notable.

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

9. A political candidates, without any previous or current political position, who is running for November 2020 election for a Senator position in United States with multiple local newspapers coverage of his candidacy.

Answer: Um, I think that fails WP:POLITICIAN, they have never had office. Articles about politicians should only be written if they have or formerly had office.

Y When running for a position, most politician would have some coverage by the news, even thought it passed WP:GNG, it is still considered not notable and such pages will be voted for deletion in WP:AfD. However, if a politician has won the election but yet to held the position in the office yet, they are considered notable. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

10. A singer who self produced his first album in May 2019 and his songs are listed in Spotify.

Answer: Look up artist, and if they don't meet anything else in WP:MUSICBIO, under Wikipedia:COMPOSER, non-notable. Artists have to have done something notable within music, or be somewhat influential. Being on spotify isn't any indication.

Y Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

C. Based on which SSN guidelines the below subjects are notable under (1) which notability criteriaMUSICBI#1 (if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations

11. Carlos Alós-Ferrer

Answer: "Since January 2019, he is the editor in chief of the Journal of Economic Psychology." Meets WP:NACADEMIC "The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area.", as long as that statement is sourced.

Pls read the question C again - Pls indicate which criteria under [WP:NACADEMIC]] is met as per your answer above. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:NACADEMIC Criteria 8

Y Subject also meets WP:NPROF criteria 1 for WP:NPROF #1 [1] for being highly cited and #8 as the chief editor of Journal of Economic Psychology [2]. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

12. Alistair Overeem

Answer: Meets WP:NMMA, holds MMA world title. WP:NMMA criteria 2 says "Have fought for the highest title of a top-tier MMA organization".

Pls read the question C again - Pls indicate which criteria under WP:NMMA is met as per your answer above. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:NMMA Criteria 2 and WP:KICK Criteria 1, has world titles in both.

Y Also meets WP:NMMA Criteria 1. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

13. Jennifer Lopez

Answer: Meets WP:NSINGER "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times." has many awards, and an entire page dedicated to her awards.

Pls read the question C again - Pls indicate which criteria underWP:NSINGER is met as per your answer above. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Meets WP:NSINGER Criteria 8 (won a grammy) and WP:NACTOR Criteria 1, has had many significant roles

Y. WP:ENTERTAINER - 1,2,3; WP:SINGER - all criteria. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

14. Three Mile Island accident

Answer: Was a big event, meets WP:EVENT because of lots of sources of coverage and an aftermath of protests, as per Wikipedia:LASTING

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

15. Persepolis

Answer: Meets WP:NGEO, significant coverage and references, and meets "Populated places without legal recognition" as a heritage site.

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

---

WikiMacaroons Good day. See assignment on above. For all the assignments, pls provide hist diffs of the articles, reverts, edits, reports, results of the reports, guidelines, talk page messages, and any hist diff that is applicable. Pls provide guidelines where applicable and justify/explain your application or analysis. Pls ping me if you need assistance (here in this program page at the communication section of every assignment). Please book mark this page and ping me when you have finished the assignment for me to review.Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:42, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia:, Phew, I think I've finished. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons, Pls read the question again for Question 13, and pls note there are some subjects (questions) do pass more than one SSN notability guidelines, pls indicate them. Kindly provide more justification/explanation for your answers in details besides just a sentence here and there. When you have done, then let me know. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: sorry for the non-specificity, I hope the improved answers are ok :) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 12:06, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons, Pls read and rework question 11-13, also pls note that some of the subjects do meet more than one SSN, pls indicate all of them and provide support/justification/explanation based on SSN guidelines (by which criteria) - be details in your answer. Ping me when you have done. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:05, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: sorry, total mental lapse there. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons see above review. Let me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to next assignment. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:57, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, I think that's all clear. I'm ready for the next assignment, where I will hopefully read the questions better :) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 11:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Sources and content policy

A. Sources

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia for such content claimed should be supported by independent (secondary), reliable sources for verification. Please read WP:RS, WP:IS, WP:RSP, WP:V, WP:PROVEIT, WP:Primary, WP:Secondary, and WP:Tertiary and answered the the below questions in your own words.

You could contact WP:RX if you could not find the sources yourself either on web due to Paywall content or printed books.

---

1.

Topic	Explanation	5 Examples	Comment by Cass
Reliable source	Reliable sources are those known to be truthful, to have integrity, and are not related to the subject matter.	(example)The Guardian newspaper The Daily Telegraph The Economist Vox The Times (London) The Observer	Y. Reliable source that is published with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
User generated sources	Self-published references from sites where uploading content is largely free by any user. These shouldn't be used as refs.	Wikipedia, obviously. Twitter Facebook Instagram Blogs	Y Wikipedia can be be used as a source. When reading Wikipedia article, read the source of the content to verify if the source is reliable and independent. If content is unsourced, dont trust the content. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Non Independent source	Sources that are related to the subject matter, and show a closeness with knowledge of a non-disclosed connection.	Press Releases Syndicated news releases Conflict of interest by person/company concerned, e.g a source written by them. Conflict of interest by someone connected Sponsored releases	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

---

2.

Type	Explanation	Sources (15 Primary ; 5 Secondary ; 5 Tertiary)	Comment by Cass
Primary	Primary sources are materials closely related or written by someone concerned with the subject matter.	(example) scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results Memoir or account of someone involved Personal site or blog of someone involved Press release about subject matter Holy texts Interview with someone involved Transcripts of speeches Transcripts of meetings Letters from someone involved Autobiography Videos of subject matter Government records Maps Journal with piece by someone involved with subject matter Scientific paper by someone involved with subject matter Police reports Government reports	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Secondary	Secondary sources are sources not directly written by someone concerned, but instead are accounts by others based on the primary sources.	(example) newspaper Newspapers Magazines Journals that wrote about the subject matter Biography of person related to the subject matter Documentary about the subject matter	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Tertiary	Accounts containing broad summaries of the primary and secondary sources, in encyclopedias, etc.	(example) encyclopedias Again, Wikipedia, obviously. University Textbooks Dictionaries Brittanica Scholarly work about subject matter	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

---

3.

Subject	Primary	Secondary	Tertiary	Comment by Cass
Example: Art	Example:Sculpture	Example:Article critiquing the sculpture	Example:Encyclopedic article on the sculptor
History	Eyewitness account	Textbook	Encyclopedia	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Science	Account by scientist	Science book	Bibliography	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Athletes	Interview	Biography	Encyclopedia	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

---

4. Please explain in your own words why the content claimed needs to be verified?

Answer: Content that is unverified leaves no way of knowing whether it's true. If a piece of information is backed up by a reliable source, then that proves the info. An encyclopedia needs to have verifiable info.

Y. It is not about true but it is all about verification - see Wikipedia:But it's true!. Example - If a well reputable/reliable, independent source indicate XXX has 2 sons, but instead he has 3 sons, we will put 2 sons on the subject article. We will only correct the content when the source (can be from another independent reliable source) corrected itself. When we look at many history events, we have not idea if the incidents were actually happened/true, but we would take/cite it from what the independent reliable source state. Sometimes few independent, reliable indicate different outcome/results/reasons, we (Wikipedia) would record them - example Alexander the Great - How he die is based on which sources you read, from poising, to malaria and typhoid fever to infectious (meningitis) to acute pancreatitis and etc. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

5.Could we used Wikipedia as the source? and why?

Answer: Some wikipedia pages can be used as sources, but anything uncited on Wikipedia should be taken with a grain of salt (apart from the obvious stuff.)

N Wikipedia can NOT be the source - see WP:CIRCULAR. Article/content from Wikipedia is based on independent, reliable sources, we the editor merely summary the significant/relevant part of the source in our own word in neutral point of view. Do not trust Wikipedia as many content is unsourced, but read the source of the content claim instead that is the reason Wikipedia is all about WP:PROVEIT and WP:V. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Comment: Sorry, Cass, I misunderstood the question. I thought you were asking if Wikipedia could be used as a source in general for non-wikipedia things.

Wikipedia can NOT be the source for non Wikipedia article (like magazines/newspapers) and it also can NOT be used as the source for Wikipedia pages (internal). All in all Wikipedia can NOT be the source. Readers need to check the source provided to read WP:V if the content claimed is a per source stated. That is the reason why Wikipedia is all about WP:PROVEIT/ WP:V.

6.Give an example and explain why a source is reliable but not independent of a subject?

Answer: Press releases are non independent sources written by someone concerned with the subject matter, but it's important to check how reliable the press release is first.

N press release is non independent and most of the time is not reliable as it is usually published by the primary source such as the company/sport club/marketing agency themselves. Pls give an example (more specific) and justify your answer. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Answer again(give specific example and justification) : Memoirs and autobiographies are always primary accounts by people concerned, so not independent, but if published reputably, reliable.

Y if it is published "by" reputable publication house. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

7.Give an example and explain why a source is independent source but not reliable?

Answer: Sources that are outdated may be independent from the subject matter, but also may have been disproved or discredited in more recent research.

N. Please read WP:RS and WP:IS again. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Answer again (give specific example and justification) : Newspapers such as The Daily Mail that are listed at WP:RSP may be independent of the subject, but is not considered reliable after community consensus, as it is a tabloid.

Y. Good. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Pls indicate "y" for yes or "n" for no or "?" after "ind", "rel" and "sig" (see first example) and give a brief explanation of why you place "y" or "n".

8.

David Petraeus

David Howell Petraeus AO (/pɪˈtreɪ.əs/; born November 7, 1952) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, 2011, until his resignation on November 9, 2012 after his affair with Paula Broadwell was reported.

Petraeus was born in Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York, the son of Sixtus Petraeus (1915–2008), a sea captain from Franeker, Netherlands.

In 2003, Petraeus commanded the 101st Airborne Division in the fall of Baghdad

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/11/09/david-petraeus-cia-resign-nbc/1695271/	The source is major newspaper	The source is reputable published source	The source discusses the subject directly and in detail	✔ Yes
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2011/09/06/petraeus-sworn-into-cia.cnn?iref=allsearch	Not related to subject matter	In WP:RSP	Article is about him	✔ Yes
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/david-petraeus-paula-broadwell_n_2118893	Major news site	Usually considered credible	Article is about him	✔ Yes
https://www.geni.com/people/Sixtus-Petraeus/6000000015418360012	Not closely related	WP:RSP	Barely anything	✘ No
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2010/05/petraeus-exclusive-201005	Independent from person	WP:RSP	Article is an exclusive on him	✔ Yes
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/beyond/interviews/petraeus.html	too close	Is an interview	is an interview with him, so yes.	✘ No
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/david-petraeus-general-surge-401740.html	No COI	WP:RSP	Is all about him	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

9. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer: Yes, he meets WP:NSOLDIER Criteria 2, as he was a general.

Y PBS is generally considered a reliable source. 2. Huffpost - Although HuffPost contributors is considered not reliable in WP:RSP but if we look closely, the piece is written by By ANNE FLAHERTY, KIMBERLY DOZIER AND ADAM GOLDMAN, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS. The Associated press is considered reliable source as they sell their news to other news agencies. However, the content is based on many individual opinions, for such I would talk it as not reliable sources. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

---

10.

Jordan Lennon (born February 22, 2000), is a British film producer and actor. Lennon is currently a member of BAFTA. He continues to work aside 20th Century Fox, Warner Bros, Wicked Wales, Capture Studios, Cineworld, Paramount Pictures, and Rockefeller Foundation.

At age 16, the Vice President of 20th Century Fox, Paul Higginson. Who previously worked on Star Wars, Titanic, and Independence Day took on Jordan and Rowan Snow as a mentor. In December 2018, Jordan and Rowan finished British Film Academy. Jordan lived in Skelmersdale for 10 years before moving to Rhyl, North Wales. He's currently writing 'Stranger in the Night' scrreenplay for Warner Brothers.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8902348/	Is a degree away from subject matter	user-generated	kinda small	✘ No
http://www.bafta.org/wales	Independent from subject matter	Is official bafta website	Makes no mention, as far as I can see (is the link dead?)	✘ No
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jordan-d-98111a125	Written by subject matter	User-generated	Not much in there	✘ No
https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Jordan-David/	Not related	No consensus but doesn't seem super reliable	Not enough direct coverage	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

11. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:The sources here don't support the notability of him. Here, he doesn't appear to be notable, but perhaps more sources could be found.

Y. Imdb is user generate site, we would not know if the content is written by the subject himself/his marketing agency - so it might not be independent. For Linkedin - even it is not independent and the content is not much but it is directly written about the subject. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

---

12.

Martina Hingis is a Swiss former professional tennis player. She won five Grand Slam singles titles. Hingis was one of the highest-paid female athletes in 2000. She retired in November 2007 after being hampered by a hip injury for several months and testing positive for a metabolite of cocaine during that year's Wimbledon Championships, which led to a two-year suspension from the sport.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://www.instagram.com/martinahingis80/	Made by herself	Made by the subject	Has direct address	✘ No
https://www.latimes.com/sports/more/la-sp-us-open-hingis-20170910-story.html	Independent	WP:RSP	Article is about her	✔ Yes
	No COI	Author has written other reliable work	Passing mention	✘ No
https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/21171438/tennis-another-twist-bizarre-career-martina-hingis	No COI	Usually considered to be	Is about her	✔ Yes
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2007/nov/01/tennis	Independent from her	WP:RSP	Article is about her	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

13. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:Notable, meets WP:NTENNIS Criteria 6, has had a junior grand slam.

Y. Instagram is not independent and not reliable as the subject writes about herself and there is not fact checking to verify the content claim that is same with any social media sites. However, since the info is about the subject directly and everything is about the subject for such it is considered significant coverage. Subject passes all WP:NTENNIS. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

---

14.

Fallingwater, Mill Run, Pennsylvania (1937)

Frank Lloyd Wright (June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959) was an American architect, interior designer, writer, and educator. Wright believed in designing structures that were in harmony with humanity and its environment, a philosophy he called organic architecture. His creative period spanned more than 70 years. He works includes The Guggenheim, swirling, snail-shaped museum in the middle of Manhattan. Fallingwater, which has been called "the best all-time work of American architecture." This is one of Wright's most famous private residences (completed 1937), was built for Mr. and Mrs. Edgar J. Kaufmann, Sr., at Mill Run, Pennsylvania. Constructed over a 30-foot waterfall, it was designed according to Wright's desire to place the occupants close to the natural surroundings. The house was intended to be more of a family getaway, rather than a live-in home.

Source assessment table:
Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
https://nypost.com/2017/06/07/frank-lloyd-wright-was-a-house-builder-and-homewrecker/	The source is major newspaper	The source is reputable published source	The source discusses the subject directly and in detail	✔ Yes
https://franklloydwright.org/work/	Personal site	Personal site	Is about him	✘ No
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2004/nf20040728_3153_db078.htm	Not close to the subject matter	WP:RSP	Is about him	✔ Yes
https://books.google.com/books?id=KSA1HTTU-eMC	No COI	Reliable author	Is about him	✔ Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

References

15. Please answer if the subject meets the "subject specific notability" guidelines, Which subject specific notability based on the given content above, and specify under (1) which notability criteria they meet or fail (example - MUSICBI#1 if certain sub set of criteria is applicable) and (2) reasons/explanations.

Answer:WP:ARCHITECT Criteria 2, as he introduced a new spiral technique.

Y subject meets WP:ARCHITECT 2 and 3. Criteria 2 as he first coined the term 'organic architecture' and criteria 3 for Fallingwater is a significant work in term of Architecture field. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

---

WikiMacaroons Good day. See Assignment 2 above. Please ping me when you have finished with the assignment and ready for a review. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:37, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia I think I've done; sorry I took so long - I had to set aside a time to do it in one go. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 13:44, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I think you have missed question 2 (secondary and tertiary questions). Kindly answer them. Secondly, I need to to elabroate/explain in "details on" independent/significant/reliable files for question 8 onward so I may know why you indicate yes/no (not all answers are the same as significant coverage/no COI etc but "really" provide "details" info to justify your answers. Btw, this NPPSCOOL program is a little complicated and reading material is a lot, all my trainees need at least a few sessions to complete the questions. If you rush to answer all questions in one go, you would not be able to read all the reading material and you need to rework the assignment which would be frustrating. So take the time to read and answer the question thoroughly. Ping when you rework and ping me when you are done. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 06:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Good advice, I'll do it chunk by chunk in future, thanks. I think I've fixed those issues. :) WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 08:31, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry to ping again, Cassiopeia, but I don't know if the previous ping went through. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 08:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I received your ping. I have 4 assignment pages needed to review and I came back late from the gym last night for such I have not had look into yours yet. Will do soon. Cheers. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, gah, sorry to be so naggy. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:22, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons No worries. It is good to check with me as sometimes I might miss the ping. Cheers. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:29, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I have reviewed partially, see my comments and will continue tmrw as I am about to head to bed. Cheers. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:35, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons See the comments. Please rework and answer Q6 and Q7 again. When you have finished, pls ping me. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:09, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia Ok, think I've fixed it. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 14:58, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons Pls see comment on Q5 about Wikipedia can NOT be the source and comment ton Q6-7 for additional questions. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:19, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Content Policy

Article titles

Please read WP:TITLE and answer the questions below

1. Article name "Hannibal Barca" - Does the article name need to be change? and Why? (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Hannibal Barca was a Carthaginian general and statesman who is widely considered one of the greatest military commanders in history. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a leading Carthaginian commander during the First Punic War (264–241 BC).

References

Answer: Looks like the references all call him Hannibal, so WP:UCRN says that the name they're most commonly called by should be the title. Unless there happens to be multiple famous hannibals, wherein you should use their full name.

Y. As per WP:COMMONNAME we use most commonly name used. A redirect "Hannibal Barca" can be created to "Hannibal". Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

2. Article name "Magic Johnson". Does the article name need to be change? and Why?(please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Earvin "Magic" Johnson Jr. (born August 14, 1959) is an American retired professional basketball player and former president of basketball operations of the Los Angeles Lakers of the National Basketball Association (NBA). He played point guard for the Lakers for 13 seasons.

References

Answer: Looks fine to me. Again, WP:UCRN says to use the name commonly used in the refs.

Y. The article name is complied with the WP:COMMONNAME. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Biographies of living persons

Please read WP:BLP and answer the questions below.

3. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Conor Anthony McGregor (born 14 July 1988) is an Irish professional mixed martial artist and boxer. His is a former Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) featherweight and lightweight champion.

On 15 August 2019, TMZ Sports published a video that appeared to show McGregor punching a man at The Marble Arch Pub in Dublin. The incident happened on 6 April and was originally reported by Irish media, although without the video that showed the attack. Irish police stated in April that they had opened an investigation. McGregor was charged with assault and first appeared in court on 11 October 2019.

In April 2019, McGregor is the father of Terri Murray's son, Clodagh. Murray bedded McGregor in 2017 at his hotel after the Aintree Grand National just four weeks bofore McGregor's girlfriend Dee Devlin gave birth to their son.

References

Answer:Most of it looks ok, but the last paragraph is not backed up by a source.

Y Need detail explanation as per guidelines and pls do that in the future so I may know what is the reasons behind your short answer.

Per WP:BLP - multiple independent reliable sources are needed and the content need to be written in neutral point of view (WP:NPOV]] and should exclude original research. Information on the assault can be included with multiple reliable published included. Unsourced content on the child should be immediately removed and it would be WP:GOSSIP, WP:GRAPEVINE. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

4. As per the texts below, pls explain the if the content is acceptable of inclusive and why. (please explain based on Wikipedia guidelines and name/link the guidelines in your answer)

Diana Nyad (née Sneed; born August 22, 1949) is an American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer who lives in 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW in Washington, D.C. and could be contacted at +0-202-456-6213. Nyad gained national attention in 1975 when she swam around Manhattan (28 mi or 45 km) and in 1979 when she swam from North Bimini, The Bahamas, to Juno Beach, Florida (102 mi (164 km)). In 2013, on her fifth attempt and at age 64, she became the first person confirmed to swim from Cuba to Florida without the aid of a shark cage, swimming from Havana to Key West (110 mi or 180 km).

References

Answer:WP:BLPPRIVACY states that addresses and phone numbers should not be included in articles. Other than that, the info looks fine.

Y. Content besides the address and phone # are well-source for such could be kept in the article. By the way, the address and tel belong to the White House. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Images copyright

Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy and Wikipedia:Public domain image resources. Please answer the questions below and (1) with explanation based on Wikipedia guidelines and (2) provide the guidelines/links in your answer.

5. Could this image-1 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Image is from US department of defence, and images taken by government employees don't fall under copyright. Non-copyrighted images can be uploaded.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PDIR

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

6. Could this image-2 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation: Is on free-images.com, which contains public domain images.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PDIR

Y. We also always need to check the "original site" (the original source) that the image is in PD (public domain). If we click on the flickr link provided on the right of the image it will take your to [3] where it was uploaded by the owner and stated public domain (PD) there.

7. Could this image-3 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia?

Answer- Explanation: The image is on commons and as been reviewed as free, therefore is ok to use.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:PDIR

Y. If the image is yet to be reviewed then again we need to check the original source as not all the images are free use claimed by the editor who uploaded the images that the images were taken by them and agree to released the right or the upload the photo is a PD. If we follow the link (source) from Wikimdeia here - Pixabay and it is stated "Free for commercial use". Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

8. Could this image-4 be uploaded into C:Main Page and used in Wikipedia? and Why.

Answer- Explanation:Can't find anything saying it's public domain, is an artistic piece so probably not.

Answer - link/guideline: WP:IMAGEPOL

Y.Using WP:IMAGEPOL is not specific enough as it refer to the whole page. Pls be provide specific guidelines next time. The image is someone's art work and the copyright holder does not indicate the image is free use image for no licensing info provided. If can not be used as it would violated copyrights guidelines as per WP:IUPC. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

Neutral point of view

P;lease read WP:NPOV and MOS:PUFF. Point out the WP:NPOV words/pharses and rewrite the paragraph on Question 9& 10 from a neutral point of view.

9. She is a brilliant boxer with a rare and exceptional beauty. She turned Pro at the age of 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 where she destroyed her opponent in 20 seconds. Her talent and marketability made her a fighter to watch right out the gate and she fought under XXX promotion on her next fight on February 2014.

Answer: Too many peacock words in there. (MOS:PUFF) Brilliant, destroyed, rare and exeptional beauty, etc. Rewrite: She is a boxer, who turned professional at age 19 after winning one amateur fight on December 14, 2013 in 20 seconds. She fought under XXX promotion on her next fight in February 2014.

Y very good. Even she is extremely beautiful, we would not indicate so for this would stray the readers' emotions. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

10. He is a popular, acclaimed Bulgarian actor, who loves by all who have watched his films. He was born in Veliko Tarnovo and started working in the film industry since he was at the tender, innocent of the age of 14 and he has featured in 44 films.

Answer: Again, too much puffery. Rewrite: He is a Bulgarian actor, born in Veliko Tarnovo. He started working in the film industry at 14 and has since featured in 44 films.

Y removed all the puffery words such as "popular, acclaimed, tender, innocent, loves by all who have watch is films". Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

11. Please read WP:DUE and in your own words, please explain why it is important to provide balance and due weight content in an article.

Answer: Due weight explains that all Wikipedia articles should represent all viewpoints, and give in-depth explanations of people's positions

Y.Take the article Capital punishment for example, there are people who want to abolish it while others want to retain it. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

No original research

Please read WP:OR and WP:NOT and answer the questions below

12. In your own words, why Wikipedia is not a platform to publish original research?

Answer: Wikipedia's policies say that statements have to be backed up by reliable references. Editors should not conduct their own research, as it may be a non-NPOV, or subjective, so independent reliable subjects are better.

Y. Wikipedia guidelines indicates all the content to be previously published by numerous independent reliable sources- see WP:PROVEIT and WP:V. It doesn't allow any opinions or ideas. Original research is a subjective point of view, not reviewed or fact checked by reliable sources - see wP:RS. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

13. In your own words, please provide one example with explanation when it is appropriate to insert an original research or an opinion in an article.

Answer: If we're giving opinions of people, (not your own) such as quotes, etc.

Y. We could use exact words from the source in the article when (1) it is a public domain sites (2) the author/site has released their copyright and anyone to use the content/image such as " agree to irrevocably agree to release content/image under the CC BY-SA License and the GFDL or under the Creative Commons license. (3) a direct quote and provide the source. Example Constitution of the United States and in Robert Whittaker (fighter) page (see below direct quote). Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

In an interview with GQ Australia, he stated:

I am immensely proud to be an Australian and to be a pioneer in the sport to, you know, lead, lead today's MMA scene against all these other countries, you know, it really, it really does light me up, to see that the Australian flag when I walk out, you know, to hear them called out that I'm Australian and I am very patriotic. I am really proud of my country and proud of where I am from.

References

14. See this video and write the content in the in an article by using the video info as the source.

Answer: Sh. Shady Alsuleiman states that jeans are not permitted in Islam for men or women, as Muslims should wear modest, baggy clothes.

Y. Good. As per WP:NPOV and written in your own words or Another way to do it is to use a direct quote (see below). Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

“ Islam demands Islam commands us with our with regards of our clothing for both men and women, our clothing must be first of all baggy, so must be loose with a men or women. It must non see-through whether men or women. It must non colorful attractive that means when someone walks everyone's looking at them. ”

References

---

Verifiability

Please read WP:V and answer the questions below

15. If the subject has two sons and it is supported by three independent, reliable sources but in reality he has 3 sons. Could we change the content from "2" sons to "3 sons"? and why?

Answer: I don't have enough proof if no source says the correct amount, so for now I can't change 2 to 3, as all the sources point the other way.

Y. Wikipedia is NOT about the true, but about verifiability by independent, reliable sources - See WP:But it's true. We correct the content when the source corrected itself (same source or other sources). Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

---

WikiMacaroons See Assignment 3 above. Ping me if you need any assistance and when you have completed the assignment. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:21, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia - Done! Sorry it took a li'l while, have been busy. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:14, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons See above review. Le me know if you have any questions or you are ready to move on to Part 2 - Assignment 4. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 10:38, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia That all seems in order, I'm ready for the next bit! WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 17:26, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Filtering - Criteria for speedy deletion

PART 2

We have looked at the requirements needed for a page to meet notable, policy and type of sources to merit a page in Wikipedia in Part 1 (Assignment 1, 2 & 3). In assignment 4, we look at what type of articles need to be filtered out from our system when reviewing a page. There are many criteria of WP:Criteria for speedy deletion. Here we discuss (1) General criteria (G1-G14), (2) Article criteria (A1-A11) and R2.

Please do the following

1. Pls set up your CSD log by installing MYCSD so I could review your CSD nomination. After saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.
2. Bookmark Earwig's Copyvio Detector in computer; and install Earwig Copyvio Detector script. (The "copyvio" will appear on the left panel under "Tools" section on every page in Wikipedia.
3. Install CV-revdel and after saving, you have to bypass your browser's cache to see the changes - see instruction at Wikipedia:Bypass your cache.

General criteria

1. Please (G1-G14) at General and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	G1	If an article has been published that just contains ridiculous or unintelligible writings, it falls under this.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
2	G2	Sandboxes that are published in the mainspace that test WP syntax, etc.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
3	G3	Pages that are obviously created to misinform/vandalise wikipedia.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
4	G4	Pages that are very similar to pages that have been deleted after consensus.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
5	G5	Pages that were solely made by now blocked users.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
6	G6	Uncontroversial cleanup of pages that are not needed from a maintenance standpoint.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
7	G7	A page with one main author asks for the page's deletion.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
8	G8	Pages that are dependant on deleted pages.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
9	G9	Deletions by the WMF.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
10	G10	Pages that are created in negative spirit to attack.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
11	G11	Spam or pages solely containing promotional content	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
12	G12	When a page has blatant copyvio and infringment, and nothing non-copyrighted worth keeping.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
13	G13	Stale drafts that have not been edited for >6 months.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
14	G14	Disambiguation pages that only point towards 0 or 1 other pages.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Article and R2 criteria

1. Please (A1-G11) criteria at WP:CSD#List of criteria and answer the following questions in your own words.

No	Criterion	Application	Comment by Cass
1	A1	Content for which the context is not provided	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
2	A2	Other language articles that are basically the same on another language wikipedia	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
3	A3	Articles with no content besides links, etc. Does not include disambiguation pages.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
4	A5	Articles that have been transwikied and just contain a definition	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
5	A7	Non-notable articles, doesn't apply to schools.	Y. applies to people, animals, organizations, web content, events. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
6	A9	Lists related to non-notable musicians that have no links.	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
7	A10	Articles that already exist on enwiki	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
8	A11	Non-notable subjects clearly invented by the user	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
9	R2	Mainspace redirects to certain namespaces	Y. Cassiopeia(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

3. Please read WP:PROMOTION and WP:G11 and provide 5 successful CSD 11 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and hist diffs and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i:Vaccinology Mexican Association

N - see admin comment here. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer ii:Patient Better

Y. The article has seeb been recreated. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iii:Bitclu

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iv:Journal of Social Change

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer v:Adam laghimi

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and answer the questions below.

3. When do we nominated a page for WP:G12 and when do we WP:REVDEL the COPYVIO text?

Answer: When an article has primarily copyright violating content, the page should be deleted. If the page is able to be rescued, REVDEL the edits that contained the copyvios.

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

4. What constitute copyright infringement/violation.

Answer: Close paraphrasing of non-free materials. Images from non-free sources.

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

5. Why some of the texts found in an article are identical as per its sources and yet they are not considered copyright violation. Please provide three examples.

Answer i: If the source that it paraphrases to is not copyrighted.

N. The question is "the texts found in an article are identical as per its sources"

Pls answer again:If the text is in the public domain

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 23:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer ii: If the person who owns the source has consented.

[[Template:{{{1}}}]] ([[Template talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] links edit). Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iii: If the source contains a quotation to be used.

Y Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

6. Why copyright violation needs to be stamped out from Wikipedia and who determined when a violation is lawfully taking place?

Answer: Because Wikipedia's platform requires content to be free to use. The law determines whether a copyvio is lawful.

Y right. Copyright infringement violation entails legal implications. Wikipedia takes violation of copyvio "very seriously". Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

7. Pls read WP:COPYVIO, WP:REVDEL, WP:COPYPASTE, WP:DCM and WP:G12 and provide 5 successful CSD 12 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol or Article for Creation section). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log. You can use Earwig's Copyvio Detector tool to check if an article is in violation of COPYVIO.

Answer i:Chennai Surat Expressway

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer ii:Alan do Nascimento

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iii:Akounak Tedalat Taha Tazoughai

Y. The article has seen been created. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iv:St Andrew, Mirehouse

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer v:Pir Nooruddin

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

'

---

8. Pls provide 5 successful CSD in any criteria except WP:G11, WP:G12 and WP:G13 articles you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY"). Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i: Tewolde Gebremariam

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer ii:Talk:St Andrew, Mirehouse

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iii:Austral Líneas Aéreas Flight 9

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iv:Tyler Wave (Note: This one was deleted under A7 and G11, but I nommed it under A7.)

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer v:ZEF-Center for Development Research

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

9. Pls read WP:R2 and WP:NPPDRAFT. Please explain when to a new page (NPP article) can be nominated for CSD R2 and what should be considered when doing such move?

Answer: R2 is for cross-namespace redirects, such as Main to Draftspace. Consider whether the redirect is actually useful before deleting it.

Y. Note on R2 to draft space - We move articles to the draftspace to allow articles to be developed especially potential but unsourced WP:BLP article. Use R2 sparingly as some admins do not like pages to be move to draft page even WP:NPPDRAFT states the move is a safe place for editor to adding necessary sources, they would deems the if the articles are not improved or edit in 6 months, it will be G13. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

10. Pls read and A1-A11 and R2 at WP:CSD and and provide 5 successful "Article CSD" articles (with at least two of them are CSD A7) you have nominated from Special:NewPagesFeed (New Page Patrol "ONLY").Pls provide the article names and I will check them at your CSD log.

Answer i CSD A7:Ganesh prasad tiwari

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer ii CSD A7:RememberKLMauthausen

N - moved to redirect. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer iii CSD R2:Josep Negre i Oliveras

N. Need to raise R2 for admin to moved the page from mainspace to draft space. See notes. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer again:

@Cassiopeia: Hi, Cass. Just wanted to point out that I sent these draftify logs, as the draftify script I use automatically tags draft redirects with CSD R2, without putting them in your CSD log, so I sent you the fact that I had draftified them and thus nommed them per R2 instead. Will soon have a look at the rest of the marking. Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 19:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Carolyn pollack

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Answer iv CSD R2:High (web series)

N. Need to raise R2 for admin to moved the page from mainspace to draft space. See notes. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Answer again:

The residence of the President of the Republic of Poland at the Hel Peninsula

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Answer v any criteria:Bianca Hendrickse-Spendlove (British English actor/actress)

Y. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

Copyright violation and paid editors

Pls read WP:COI and WP:PAID and answer the following question

11. How do we spot a COI/PAID editor?

Answer: Look out for promotional writing, editing articles of similar subject, having a username that relates to their promotional behaviour, etc.

Y see more on "Notes" section. Cassiopeia^(talk)

12. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a COI editor?

Answer:I think there was a discussion recently about whether COI editors should have to go through AFC, and I reckon so. Obviously they have to disclose their conflict of interest, but if their article doesn't present due weight or is too promotional, report it.

Y. In Wikipedia guidelines, a paid editor's article needs to go through AfC then NPP to review the content (no exception - if you see any Paid editor editor on main space moved it to draft immediate). However, some admin would considered COI editor's article needs to go through AfC but I have yet to seen it in any Wikipedia guidelines stated that. For CoI article, we tag the article with COI, send a COI message to the editor. Editor needs to disclosed their COI on their user page and the article talk page - see WP:Disclose. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

13. Please read WP:PAID. What you should do when you review an NPP article and notice the creator is a paid editor?

Answer:If they didn't disclose it, should probably report that.

N. Paid editor (which is also a COI editor) needs to disclosed their COI on the article talk page and their user page. We "must" move a COI editor page from new page feed to draft space no matter how many years/edits/page created by the COI editor so the article would be first check by WP:Article for Creation (AfC) reviewer and then by New Page (NPP) reviewer/patroller. If a reviewer has both AfC and NPP reviewer right, then once the article (any article) is accepted in draft space will be automatically bypass New Page review and place in main space. Google will index the page (a few hours to a few days - Wikipedia has no control of when it will be indexed) once the article is accepted by a NPP reveiwer. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

---

WikiMacaroons Good day. Pls see assignment 4 above. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, I have Twinkle already recording my CSD log, does it make any difference? WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 10:16, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroonsTHIS is your CSD log. Cassiopeia^(talk) 11:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Cassiopeia, regarding the finding COI pages section, do they have to be mainspace pages? WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 07:16, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons COI, CSD for promotion, Copyvio can be tagged in newpage or draft pages as long as they meets the criteria. Cassiopeia^(talk) 07:27, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Sorry to ping you before I've finished the assignment, but I need help. This assignment has been taking a while, because it's quite difficult to find lots of examples of the CSDs. Is there any quicker way to catch these? Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 20:24, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons For promotional and copyvio (G11 and G12) you can nominate article from the new page and draft space; but for all other CSD you can nominate on new page - see [NewPagesFeed here and select the new page or draft space by clicking the button on the grey panel on the top. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 01:42, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I do notice you have been working on the assignment and it is encouraging. For R2, pls read Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects and WP:NPPDRAFT. What you could do is find article (very important to note this) which the subject is notable (say a national elected politician) where by no sources are provided (Note if there is any external links/further reading or refs provided but without inline citation, then pls DO NOT R2 the article). You can find them on New page patrol at New Pages Feed. Here, R2 is to move articles from the new page to the draftspace. This is to allow articles to be developed especially potential but unsourced WP:BLP article. Use R2 sparingly as some admins do not like pages to be move to draft page even WP:NPPDRAFT states the move is a safe place for editor to adding necessary sources, they would deems the if the articles are not improved or edit in 6 months, it will be G13. To request for a R2 add R2 template (see -Template:Db-r2) on top of the page. Let me know if you need further help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Phew, @Cassiopeia:, that assignment took a rather long time! Glad to have finally finished it. Sorry to have taken so long. Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 19:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons No worries. Give me a few days to review it. Thank you. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:37, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons No worries that you took a long time to complete. I am happy with your progress and perseverance. I know Assignment 5 is particular hard so is Assignment 6, but the remaining assignments would be rather easy. Pls see notes below and comments above and pls re-answer Q 5 and R2 - Q10 iii & iV. Once you have done, ping me. Cassiopeia^(talk) 09:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: I fixed my answer, and please read my comment on R2 about how my draftify script automatically nominates mainspace-to-draft redirects for Speedy Deletion R2, which is why I couldn't send you it in my CSD log, and sent the draftify log instead. Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 09:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I hav reviewed (answer again) for Q5. As for R2 - Q10 iii & iV, you need to do "R2" for another 2 articles. R2 is not moving the article from mainspace to draft space "by you" but by "admin". We request an R2 and upon admin approval, the admin will move the article to draft safe. Athough move can do the function, this is not the exercise here. When requested enough move to draft successful R2, then the editor can request for "move manager" user right. To request/tag R2 pls use {{db-r2}} - see Template:Db-r2. Once you have "answer again (new articles)" then ping me. Cassiopeia^(talk) 23:18, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Sorry I’ve been AWOL lately, have been focussed on Dapperbot. I’ll get on finishing the assignment now.

WikiMacaroons Hi, Thank you for letting me know. Appreciate it. When you have done with the remaining answers, Kindly ping me. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 08:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Ok, I've done two new R2's. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 16:53, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons I am so sorry for taking so long to review you answers as I thought I had done them already weeks ago. Upon checking on the your program page and found out I havent. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:20, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

---

Notes

R2 - See additional info on R2 Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects and WP:NPPDRAFT. What you could do is find article (very important to note this) which the subject is notable (say a national elected politician) where by no sources are provided (Note if there is any external links/further reading or refs provided but without inline citation, then pls DO NOT R2 the article). You can find them on New page patrol at New Pages Feed. Here, R2 is to move articles from the new page to the draftspace. This is to allow articles to be developed especially potential but unsourced WP:BLP article. Use R2 sparingly as some admins do not like pages to be move to draft page even WP:NPPDRAFT states the move is a safe place for editor to adding necessary sources, they would deems the if the articles are not improved or edit in 6 months, it will be G13. To request for a R2 add R2 template (see -Template:Db-r2) on top of the page.

G11 (promo) - What constitute a G11? At times it is hard to define. Although if a article is bluntly promote or advertise about the subject then it is a G11. Sometimes, the it is a little subtle and that would be a judgement call. As a rule of thumb, if article about an entertainers (actor/singer/DJ/artist and etc) in dept of how hard they work, how motivated they are, using all the puffery/flowery languages and especially the subject does not meet notability guidelines. For a corporation, we would see they list down all they product/services, their directors/key person in the company, they mission, their client, they are the influencer in their industrial, all the words/phrased to enhance/market the company and no substantial info that is supported by independent reliable sources.

G12 (copyvio) -

Copyright violation addresses the use of original expression without permission of the holder which is a violation of laws even the credit is given to the source. For articles, the Copyright Law gives the copyright protection to the “original works of authorship fixed in in a tangible medium of expression” in the newspaper, magazine and freelance article at the moment of their creation, for the life of the creator plus 70 years after, and 95 years for corporation publication or 120 years from date of creation, whichever is shorter.

A “fact” is not considered an original work of authorship; but how the ways facts are recorded where the style of the writing, choice and/or arrangement of words are copyrightable. An infringement of copyright is committed when a person uses the “exact words /almost exact words in a consecutive manner” of the author/holder. To note, as a guideline, a few words copies from the original works and an idea of expression such as "weather the storm", 'crossing the Rubicon" "as dead as a doornail" and etc. proper nouns, document/event/treaty/person/title/ names are generally acceptable and so is a direct quote of speech. However, any longer phrases which would be expression in a number of ways are copyright protected. To use one of two short sentences on a large article generally is ok but it will considered infringement if the edit entry is consists of big percentage of the original work and yet for some (such as newspaper/press/journalism that takes their work very seriously - anything more than 4 exact consecutively words would considered copyvio). To avoid copyright infringement, one needs uses his/her own words to convey the source’s information. Paraphrasing could minimize the the copyright violation; however, "threshold" ultimately, court judgement would determined the if copyright violation has been made.

Copyvio for texts or images shared the same notion that it is not a copyvio if the verbatim texts or images are taken from free licence and Public domain sites/specific page/image. Always check the "original source" even if in WikiCommon the editor who upload the image claim taken from a PD site, we need to check the link provided and if the site indicate the image taken from another source, then we check the source. For texts, we need to check the sites if it is a PD, sometimes the disclaimer of PD is not on the page, but on the home page or "about" page or FAQ page. Secondly, for older article (no in NPP Feed), any copyvio texts found, we will revdel it as it is almost always it is not the first versions. If a small amount of verbatim texts found in NPP Feed articles, we would revdel them; but large amount of verbatim texts we will tag G12.

Lastly, here are a few examples where the German car maker Audi was sued for copyright breach.

1. Audi infringed copyright violation over Eminem’s song “Lose Yourself” in their commercial advertising. [4]

2. Audi was fined US $ 965,000 over copyright infringement for using 10 words from Brian Andreas’s story of “Angel of Mercy” - [5]

I think I just had a wake-up call, and it was disguised as a car, and it was screaming at me not to get too comfortable and fall asleep and miss my life. (Audi commercial) Some people don’t know that there are angels whose only job is to make sure you don’t get too comfortable & fall asleep & miss your life.(Brian Andreas’ print)

Spot COI / PAID COI editors are permitted to edit Wikipedia and create on the affected articles; however, it is "HIGHLY DISCOURAGE/NOT RECOMMENDED as it is very difficult for the COI editors to write the article/input info into the affected article in [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view}}.

1.Use person pronouns and possessives (I, we, my, our) 2.Multiple references to company, financial listings, staff lists, interviews, own publication, press release, blog and with clean references 3.Well written prose 'too perfect to be true' and only with single/2 edits 4.Editors have created multiple company related articles 5.Editors disclosed their COI/PAID in their userpage (not tag with COI disclose), or disclosure when they ask question in WP:Teahouse, WP:Help Desk, WP:AFCHD or receivers' talk pages.

A7/A9/A11 - Credible claim of significance - If the subject content do have such claim, then it is not a A7 even the article at the present stage of the article is not notable. Choose other method. (1) after a WP:BEFORE and found no independent reliable sources to support the notability requirements, then nominated for WP:AFD, or R2 to draft space if no sources are provided (do R2 sparingly). If it is a WP:BLP without source, then WP:BLPPROD or R2. - see Wikipedia:Credible claim of significance

Hope the above help. Note the above does not substitute the Wikipedia links and reading material I provided.

---

Filtering - Deletion policy & other alternatives

In assignment 4, we look at articles which fits in WP:Criteria for speedy deletion (CSD) where by the the articles are deleted within a few hours to 24 hours from the time of the nomination. In Assignment 5, we discuss the what actions should be taken for those articles do not fit under the CSD criteria but do not meet relevant criteria for content of the encyclopedia.

Please read WP:PROD, WP:BLPPROD, WP:MERGE, WP:DRAFTIFY, WP:NPPDRAFT and WP:REDIR, WP:AFD and answer the following questions. (Provide links and hisdiff where they are applied.)

1. Under what circumstances do we propose deletion (PROD) a page and why do we do that?

Answer: Propose deletion on uncontroversial pages, that are abandoned and do not fit CSD criteria. When the PROD tag has been up for a week with no objection, the page is deleted by an admin.

2. What should we do before we PROD a page? and what should be considered /action during a nomination?

Answer: You should make sure the article hasn't been discussed before, at another PROD or at an AfD. You should also make sure the article is not salvagable; make sure that deletion is the last-resort option.

3. What is the criteria when nominated a BLPPROD? If we choose not to BLPPROD a page what are the alternatives? (give three examples with explanations)

Answer: It's for Biographies of living people that are unsourced. Check that it has no sources, check that you can find no sources, check that it doesn't meet CSD, check it hasn't been vandalised to remove sources, and remove any unsourced statements.

4. In what circumstances we nominate an AFD and what step should be done prior such action.

Answer: An article that you don't believe is notable enough for wikipedia, else fails to meet other criteria for inclusion, but needs a discussion to be held, as it's not as clear-cut or obvious as a potential CSD or PROD.

5 How long do PROD, BLPPROD and AFD last prior it is deleted or decline?

Answer: Each one lasts a week.

6. When a page has been previously BLPROD and was provide a source; however if you still think that article should be deleted, what can you do?

Answer: Nominate it for AfD, if you still feel that it fails SNG for people.

7. When do we decide whether an article should be PROD or WP:BLPROD or WP:AFD?

Answer: Check that the article can't be improved. If it doesn't fit the CSD criteria, PROD. If it's a BLP, BLPPROD. If it might be more controversial, AFD.

8. What are the reason to WP:Merge a page to another page?

Answer: If one article contains information that could easily be an additional part of another article, and doesn't meet the criteria to be a standalone article.

9. List 10 reasons we purpose WP:REDIR.

Answer:

1. If an article is moved, a redirect needs to be there so as to not break links from other pages or sites.
2. If an article name is commonly misspelled
3. If an article incorporates information about another topic that doesn't meet criteria to be a different article.
4. If an article name could be written with different punctuation
5. If an article name could be written with different case
6. If an article name could be pluralised
7. If an article name is often an acronym
8. Surnames of people who are often known by their surname should redirect to their full name.
9. If an article name contains accents, it should have a non-accented redirect for keyboards without accents.
10. Former names of things should redirect to their current name.

10. When article can be moved to draft space?

Answer: If it could potentially meet notability guidelines, but doesn't meet quality guidelines enough to be in mainspace.

11. Nominate 5 articles for WP:AFD by using WP:Twinkle and provide explanation of your nomination.

Answer 1:Ayr College - It was a no longer functioning college with no references about it online. It had since been merged into another school, so the AfD ended with Redirect.

Answer 2:Robert Šulgan - Failed the specific notability guideline for boxers.

Answer 3:Dis Morning - I couldn't find any online refs, and the AfD ended as Redirect.

Answer 4:Mizo Phyll - Quite clearly non-notable but not uncontroversial enough for PROD

Answer 5:Jama Mohamud Takar - a politician, but not one who had ever held office, and the tone was quite promotional.

12. Participate in 5 WP:AFD where by you are the first voter of the discussion. Please provide you reason either to delete, keep, redirect or merge.

Answer 1:Double Player - I searched, and couldn't find any Reliable sources demonstrating significant coverage, so I voted delete.

Answer 2:Jai Bajarangabhali - Failed SNG for films.

Answer 3:One Globe Conference - Was pretty spammy.

Answer 4:Nicholas Montgomery Black - Failed WP:NACADEMIC.

Answer 5:Party of Alberta - Curiously I was the only one who voted in this AfD. Anyway, it failed WP:NORG

13. Nominate 2 articles for WP:PROD and state your reasons.

Answer 1:Wf360 - Was unambiguously non-notable, barely referenced

Answer 2:Dixiana (train) - Absolutely no sources online.

14. Nominate 2 article for WP:BLPROD and state your reasons.

Answer 1:Andrés Andreani - Non-notable person

Answer 2:

15.Nominate 2 article for WP:NPPDRAFT and state your reasons.

Answer 1:Draft:Smoogle - sent to draftspace because it was an already previously deleted page, and was not ready for draftspace.

Answer 2:Draft:The responsibility of lab workers - had one paragraph, only one citation, and it was a blog.

---

WikiMacaroons Hi, This would be the last difficult assignment besides the final exam. Assignments 6-10 are somewhat easy. Let me knwo if you have any questions and stay safe. Best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 05:24, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Hi cass, thanks for the assignment. Question: Do the AFDs I nominate have to be deleted in the end? Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 14:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons Hi Macaroons, There are AfD questions in the assignment - (A) (5 examples) is you nominate for delete and the (B) (5 examples) that you are the first voter which the page is nominated by other editors. For (A) you after reading the article and check with the GNG, SNG gudilines and do a WP:BEFORE (very important) and if you decide the article fails GNG and SNG then nominate the article for delete. To answer your question, the article need to be deleted after the discussions/vote byt other editors. If the article you you nonimated outcome is a keep, then it means you had nominated wronly. For (B) read the explanation from the nominator, the article and check the existing sources and do a WP:BEFORE (very important) and check the GNG and associated SNG guidelines, and determine if the article should be deleted, kept, redirected, drafted or merged. Do always give your reason/explanation/ judgetification when you vote especially it needs to be aligned with notability guidelines. Take a look at the previous nominations, the dicussion and the results at WP:AFD and observe how other editors provide the reasons and the associate result decided by the admins first to gain some knowdelge of how things work. Let me know if you have further quesions. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:31, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

@Cassiopeia: Hi, I've been working on these assignments, but I've been having a bit of trouble finding articles that can be nominated for PROD or BLPPROD. Could you please advise the best way to find articles that are eligible for PROD? Thanks, WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 14:41, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiMacaroons For AfD, PROD, PRODBLP and all CSDs - you could find them at [New Pages Feed. Make sure the blue bottom is on "New Page Patrol". This is the section where by new articles have just been created (from recent months to to date). (note for CSD 11 and CSD 12 - you cand find them at "New Page Patrol" (NPP) and "Article for Creation" (AfC) section. DO NOT nominate any other criteria other than CSD 12 and CSD 11 in AfC section". Let me know if anything else I could help. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 01:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)